comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by RonaldVilliers - Shoogly Pegro! (U21490)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Irvine No5* (U1006)
posted 1 minute ago
Against Motherwell we deserved to win by more
-----------------------------------------------------------------
you were lucky to get away with the win
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Right then
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Love the denial
I think some on here think that because we are Celtic fans we can't possibly have seen the game
------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody thinks Celtic fans don't watch Rangers games, believe me
Probably see more of us than you do Celtic.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
i've seen a few rangers games this season
motherwell was on tv and i got a link for hibs because kiddo was dingying me and i thought it would be a good game.
i dont think taking an interest is a bad thing tbh
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Curly 💩 - I'm mumpsimus and I know it.' (except on a Wednesday, that is my obstreperous day ) - ITS JIST A BIG CLIQUE N'AT (U1103)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by JuegoDeFuego (U19139)
posted 1 minute ago
I think some on here think that because we are Celtic fans we can't possibly have seen the game
----------------------------------------------------------
Really?
I think it has been well established on here that most Celtic fans sit watching every Rangers with extreme excitement waiting for us to slip up or for a ref to make a decision in our favour.
I would be amazed if many of the Celtic posters on here missed a minute of Gers action this season.
It seems to be what many of you boys live for.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only surprise for me would be if they watch Rangers without a box of Kleenex handy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well there's no need for you to be surprised then
There's a good reason why Rangers fans don't tune-in to Celtic TV.
Can you actually see that far
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Can I just check something. Its fine to say that the new players this season are far better after 3 or 4 games, but it's too early to assess Pedro after 15-20 games?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
We don't suit 4-4-2 with our current squad.
Plus it's an antiquated system in general.
However if we are going to persist with it we need width. Candeias on the right is a good option, but we have nobody on the left of a similar style. Not to mention left back is a weak spot.
And Morelos needs a proper partner.
With less Miller and Kranjkar if possible. Both of them are done.
comment by BlueNose 🚾 (U6456)
posted 14 seconds ago
We don't suit 4-4-2 with our current squad.
Plus it's an antiquated system in general.
However if we are going to persist with it we need width. Candeias on the right is a good option, but we have nobody on the left of a similar style. Not to mention left back is a weak spot.
And Morelos needs a proper partner.
With less Miller and Kranjkar if possible. Both of them are done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to try telling Esc that?
comment by My POV-they want my name! (U10636)
posted 8 minutes ago
Can I just check something. Its fine to say that the new players this season are far better after 3 or 4 games, but it's too early to assess Pedro after 15-20 games?
If you're a Rangers fan then yes that's fine.
For most sane people of planet earth, it's what we like to call "bullsh!t"
comment by Curly 💩 - I'm mumpsimus and I know it.' (except on a Wednesday, that is my obstreperous day ) - ITS JIST A BIG CLIQUE N'AT (U1103)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by JFK - Trebs done, the rebs won. "how ye doin anyway?" (U8919)
posted 5 minutes ago
i've seen a few rangers games this season
motherwell was on tv and i got a link for hibs because kiddo was dingying me and i thought it would be a good game.
i dont think taking an interest is a bad thing tbh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look on the bright though
At least yer wean is a good judge of character
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Safe to say she wont be left lumbered trying to get a drunken buffoon in a taxi
comment by My POV-they want my name! (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by BlueNose 🚾 (U6456)
posted 14 seconds ago
We don't suit 4-4-2 with our current squad.
Plus it's an antiquated system in general.
However if we are going to persist with it we need width. Candeias on the right is a good option, but we have nobody on the left of a similar style. Not to mention left back is a weak spot.
And Morelos needs a proper partner.
With less Miller and Kranjkar if possible. Both of them are done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont really think the formation is the problem... Any formation can be successful so long as the you utilise the players properly and they know what their role is...
I mean Leicester won the EPL playing 442.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by NNH, unbeatable, unstoppable, inVIncible. Glasgow Celtic 💚 (U10730)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by My POV-they want my name! (U10636)
posted 8 minutes ago
Can I just check something. Its fine to say that the new players this season are far better after 3 or 4 games, but it's too early to assess Pedro after 15-20 games?
If you're a Rangers fan then yes that's fine.
For most sane people of planet earth, it's what we like to call "bullsh!t"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It does seem like an odd angle to take.
Did esc filter you too?
All I did was use the smiley and he did the same with me. Pathetic.
Happy to dish it out but can't take it in return.
I was gonna follow it up, agreeing that the Scottish football media (and greater media in general) are sub-standard, but do have a point with Pedro as it isn't just the three results from this season that they're basing it on, but his horrendous form and performances from last season too. Even Murty was getting more out the team than he was/is.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Me? He filtered me ages ago-think I was part of his cull after the cup final. Said at the weekend, are you really a genuine Celtic fan if Esc hasn't filtered you? But he seems to be filtering his own that don't agree with him.
Guy's a banger.
comment by Curly 💩 - I'm mumpsimus and I know it.' (except on a Wednesday, that is my obstreperous day ) - ITS JIST A BIG CLIQUE N'AT (U1103)
posted 20 seconds ago
There seems to be a lot of revisionism on here about Murty, from both tims and bears
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who mentioned Murty?
JDF-apart from Alves, I don't think any of the others have anymore 'pedigree' than the guys that you had before.
As for his tactics allowing you to dominate the game-I've read plenty on here that said Hearts just sat back and let you attack them. Did Pedro not say something about Lafferty practically playing left back for most of the game?
Sign in if you want to comment
Tactics/formations one in the same!
Page 3 of 11
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 21/8/17
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by RonaldVilliers - Shoogly Pegro! (U21490)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Irvine No5* (U1006)
posted 1 minute ago
Against Motherwell we deserved to win by more
-----------------------------------------------------------------
you were lucky to get away with the win
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Right then
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Love the denial
I think some on here think that because we are Celtic fans we can't possibly have seen the game
------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody thinks Celtic fans don't watch Rangers games, believe me
Probably see more of us than you do Celtic.
posted on 21/8/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/17
i've seen a few rangers games this season
motherwell was on tv and i got a link for hibs because kiddo was dingying me and i thought it would be a good game.
i dont think taking an interest is a bad thing tbh
posted on 21/8/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/17
comment by Curly 💩 - I'm mumpsimus and I know it.' (except on a Wednesday, that is my obstreperous day ) - ITS JIST A BIG CLIQUE N'AT (U1103)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by JuegoDeFuego (U19139)
posted 1 minute ago
I think some on here think that because we are Celtic fans we can't possibly have seen the game
----------------------------------------------------------
Really?
I think it has been well established on here that most Celtic fans sit watching every Rangers with extreme excitement waiting for us to slip up or for a ref to make a decision in our favour.
I would be amazed if many of the Celtic posters on here missed a minute of Gers action this season.
It seems to be what many of you boys live for.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only surprise for me would be if they watch Rangers without a box of Kleenex handy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well there's no need for you to be surprised then
posted on 21/8/17
There's a good reason why Rangers fans don't tune-in to Celtic TV.
Can you actually see that far
posted on 21/8/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/17
Can I just check something. Its fine to say that the new players this season are far better after 3 or 4 games, but it's too early to assess Pedro after 15-20 games?
posted on 21/8/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/17
We don't suit 4-4-2 with our current squad.
Plus it's an antiquated system in general.
However if we are going to persist with it we need width. Candeias on the right is a good option, but we have nobody on the left of a similar style. Not to mention left back is a weak spot.
And Morelos needs a proper partner.
With less Miller and Kranjkar if possible. Both of them are done.
posted on 21/8/17
comment by BlueNose 🚾 (U6456)
posted 14 seconds ago
We don't suit 4-4-2 with our current squad.
Plus it's an antiquated system in general.
However if we are going to persist with it we need width. Candeias on the right is a good option, but we have nobody on the left of a similar style. Not to mention left back is a weak spot.
And Morelos needs a proper partner.
With less Miller and Kranjkar if possible. Both of them are done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to try telling Esc that?
posted on 21/8/17
comment by My POV-they want my name! (U10636)
posted 8 minutes ago
Can I just check something. Its fine to say that the new players this season are far better after 3 or 4 games, but it's too early to assess Pedro after 15-20 games?
If you're a Rangers fan then yes that's fine.
For most sane people of planet earth, it's what we like to call "bullsh!t"
posted on 21/8/17
comment by Curly 💩 - I'm mumpsimus and I know it.' (except on a Wednesday, that is my obstreperous day ) - ITS JIST A BIG CLIQUE N'AT (U1103)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by JFK - Trebs done, the rebs won. "how ye doin anyway?" (U8919)
posted 5 minutes ago
i've seen a few rangers games this season
motherwell was on tv and i got a link for hibs because kiddo was dingying me and i thought it would be a good game.
i dont think taking an interest is a bad thing tbh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look on the bright though
At least yer wean is a good judge of character
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Safe to say she wont be left lumbered trying to get a drunken buffoon in a taxi
posted on 21/8/17
comment by My POV-they want my name! (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by BlueNose 🚾 (U6456)
posted 14 seconds ago
We don't suit 4-4-2 with our current squad.
Plus it's an antiquated system in general.
However if we are going to persist with it we need width. Candeias on the right is a good option, but we have nobody on the left of a similar style. Not to mention left back is a weak spot.
And Morelos needs a proper partner.
With less Miller and Kranjkar if possible. Both of them are done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont really think the formation is the problem... Any formation can be successful so long as the you utilise the players properly and they know what their role is...
I mean Leicester won the EPL playing 442.
posted on 21/8/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/17
comment by NNH, unbeatable, unstoppable, inVIncible. Glasgow Celtic 💚 (U10730)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by My POV-they want my name! (U10636)
posted 8 minutes ago
Can I just check something. Its fine to say that the new players this season are far better after 3 or 4 games, but it's too early to assess Pedro after 15-20 games?
If you're a Rangers fan then yes that's fine.
For most sane people of planet earth, it's what we like to call "bullsh!t"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It does seem like an odd angle to take.
posted on 21/8/17
Did esc filter you too?
All I did was use the smiley and he did the same with me. Pathetic.
Happy to dish it out but can't take it in return.
I was gonna follow it up, agreeing that the Scottish football media (and greater media in general) are sub-standard, but do have a point with Pedro as it isn't just the three results from this season that they're basing it on, but his horrendous form and performances from last season too. Even Murty was getting more out the team than he was/is.
posted on 21/8/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/17
Me? He filtered me ages ago-think I was part of his cull after the cup final. Said at the weekend, are you really a genuine Celtic fan if Esc hasn't filtered you? But he seems to be filtering his own that don't agree with him.
Guy's a banger.
posted on 21/8/17
comment by Curly 💩 - I'm mumpsimus and I know it.' (except on a Wednesday, that is my obstreperous day ) - ITS JIST A BIG CLIQUE N'AT (U1103)
posted 20 seconds ago
There seems to be a lot of revisionism on here about Murty, from both tims and bears
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who mentioned Murty?
JDF-apart from Alves, I don't think any of the others have anymore 'pedigree' than the guys that you had before.
As for his tactics allowing you to dominate the game-I've read plenty on here that said Hearts just sat back and let you attack them. Did Pedro not say something about Lafferty practically playing left back for most of the game?
Page 3 of 11
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10