or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 306 comments are related to an article called:

9/11 - thoughts 16 years on

Page 7 of 13

posted on 12/9/17

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
It was a documentary.
Unless you're saying it they hired actors to impersonate them.
................
Quite possibly.

The one I know about is a web site the conspiracy theorists referred to on the Engineer experts on the WTC collapse.
-------


So you're creating a conspiracy to avoid another conspiracy?

posted on 12/9/17

So you're creating a conspiracy to avoid another conspiracy?

..............

If only you saw the irony in that.

posted on 12/9/17

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 12/9/17

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 12/9/17

comment by No Love - "The Scousification of the Media" (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
comment by No Love - "The Scousification of the Media" (U1282)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
I read it was reinforced steel which begins to melt at temps higher than jet fuel can burn
-------------------------
it would lose its strength still at the heat that was there
-------
No science to back this.
-----------------
you think there is no science to show that metal loses strength when heated up?
------
No, jet fuel could not burn hot enough to melt the steel at the site. Even if not, the steel nearer the fuel would have collapsed long before the steel on the other end of the building.

There'd be no uniform collapse, no?

The building was meant to withstand hits from planes which would obviously be carrying fuel.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The planes that hit the towers were all laden with fuel.The terrorists all chose aircraft that were flying right across the states and had about 5 hours flying time worth of fuel on them when they hit the towers.

They didn't randomly pick a flight the chose the aircraft that would cause the biggest devastation.

For them I doubt for one second they'd think that the towers would collapse,to them that was a bonus

posted on 12/9/17

comment by Curly 💩 - I'm mumpsimus and I know it.' (except on a Wednesday, that is my obstreperous day ) - ITS JIST A BIG CLIQUE N'AT (U1103)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Kante's Dad-Heavy Jumbo (U20563)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 8 seconds ago
How come you don't know how this is possible?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give me a proper answer VC you truculent prat.

...............

Do you have any experience of flying an aircraft?

Apparently there isn't much to it apart from the tricky bits of landing and taking off.

I will let you work the rest out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think that's true you are a moron as well as a complete shiithole of a human being.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No

It is true

90% of anpilots training is determined by take off and landing

That is why to become an official pilot you have to have X amount of flying time and it only includes flying time if you have took off and landed

And even if it was not true I am not sure how that would affect how much of a human being a poster is 😂😂😂

----------------------------------------------------------------------
My opinion of his humanity has nothing to do with his knowledge of aviation. The guy's a complete shiiitcuuuunt whatever the subject

posted on 12/9/17

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 12/9/17

comment by Cornelius Oofterom (U15867)
comment by No Love - "The Scousification of the Media" (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Cornelius Oofterom (U15867)
I saw an interview by the guy who owned the WTC buildings (or some of them), and he suggested it was decided by the Fire Dept, Safety people etc... that Building 7 was too badly damaged so it would be better to be pulled down, and that that is what happened.
---
Why not come out and say that then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's the clip of the interview I saw I saw before:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p34XrI2Fm6I
------
There's many interviews. Electrical engineers and what have you who worked on the building too.

posted on 12/9/17

The guy's a complete shiiitcuuuunt whatever the subject

................

Only to people who I deem to be wasters of oxygen.

I am perfectly reasonable to normal people.

posted on 12/9/17

First of all, 9/11 was a horrible tragedy where thousands of innocent lives have been lost both in the US directly from the impact or abroad as a result of foreign policies.

What confuses me though is how some people get offended when others think the event wasn't as described in the official reports. Questioning the motives and logic is a good thing and doesn't in any way suggest you don't have sympathy for the familes and people involved.

The problem with conspiracy theories is that they're all branded the same. Whether it's reptilian species in disguise as human or other theories with more concrete evidence they just get added to the same bucket and one totally unrelated to next can reduce it's credibility.

Now there is serious evidence against the official reports on 9/11 and a lot of unexplained questions. People tend to pick a side and confirmation bias helps their opinion, almost skipping over the counter argument.

What I do know is that you can't dismiss the theory completely. Governments and private agencies aren't angels in the slightest.

Even from an economic point of view if you read books like "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" you would understand the involvement of agencies in the same of self interest.

posted on 12/9/17

comment by TUX (U5315)
I believe the official explanation of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory in itself and how so many 'don't smell a rat' is beyond me tbh.

The whole thing stinks.
-------
Exactly.

posted on 12/9/17

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 12/9/17

comment by Boss By Hugo (U18550)
posted 1 minute ago
First of all, 9/11 was a horrible tragedy where thousands of innocent lives have been lost both in the US directly from the impact or abroad as a result of foreign policies.

What confuses me though is how some people get offended when others think the event wasn't as described in the official reports. Questioning the motives and logic is a good thing and doesn't in any way suggest you don't have sympathy for the familes and people involved.

The problem with conspiracy theories is that they're all branded the same. Whether it's reptilian species in disguise as human or other theories with more concrete evidence they just get added to the same bucket and one totally unrelated to next can reduce it's credibility.

Now there is serious evidence against the official reports on 9/11 and a lot of unexplained questions. People tend to pick a side and confirmation bias helps their opinion, almost skipping over the counter argument.

What I do know is that you can't dismiss the theory completely. Governments and private agencies aren't angels in the slightest.

Even from an economic point of view if you read books like "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" you would understand the involvement of agencies in the same of self interest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And yet after 16 years and a day not one of the conspirators has broken their silence.Remarkable in this day and age with hacking at industrial levels has no one found any evidence pointing the finger at the government or agencies within

posted on 12/9/17

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 12 seconds ago
The guy's a complete shiiitcuuuunt whatever the subject

................

Only to people who I deem to be wasters of oxygen.

I am perfectly reasonable to normal people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you ain't. You're an ex-army know all bully who would get a smack in real life if you acted like you do on here.

posted on 12/9/17

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 12/9/17

Again, absolute nonsense and I have already explained how the building would have collapsed with a collision on the upper floors, the floors would simply not have been designed to withstand the dead load of 5 or 6 floor above

It is not rocket science
-------
Going by this, the 'dead load' could not have been evenly spread on the floors in which case the building must fall at an angle.

That's how other buildings go down anyway.

posted on 12/9/17

And yet after 16 years and a day not one of the conspirators has broken their silence.Remarkable in this day and age with hacking at industrial levels has no one found any evidence pointing the finger at the government or agencies within

.........................

And when you think of how many conspirators there must have been just to be involved in this massive cover up, the mind really boggles.

posted on 12/9/17

comment by Curly 💩 - I'm mumpsimus and I know it.' (except on a Wednesday, that is my obstreperous day ) - ITS JIST A BIG CLIQUE N'AT (U1103)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Kante's Dad-Heavy Jumbo (U20563)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Curly 💩 - I'm mumpsimus and I know it.' (except on a Wednesday, that is my obstreperous day) - ITS JIST A BIG CLIQUE N'AT (U1103)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Kante's Dad-Heavy Jumbo (U20563)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 8 seconds ago
How come you don't know how this is possible?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give me a proper answer VC you truculent prat.

...............

Do you have any experience of flying an aircraft?

Apparently there isn't much to it apart from the tricky bits of landing and taking off.

I will let you work the rest out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think that's true you are a moron as well as a complete shiithole of a human being.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No

It is true

90% of anpilots training is determined by take off and landing

That is why to become an official pilot you have to have X amount of flying time and it only includes flying time if you have took off and landed

And even if it was not true I am not sure how that would affect how much of a human being a poster is 😂😂😂

----------------------------------------------------------------------
My opinion of his humanity has nothing to do with his knowledge of aviation. The guy's a complete shiiitcuuuunt whatever the subject
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well I obviously don't know about the history between you but with your posts on flying a plane you have came across as someone I would not trust to fly a kite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many hours have you logged?

posted on 12/9/17

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
So you're creating a conspiracy to avoid another conspiracy?
..............
If only you saw the irony in that.
======
No denial.

posted on 12/9/17

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 12/9/17

The planes that hit the towers were all laden with fuel.The terrorists all chose aircraft that were flying right across the states and had about 5 hours flying time worth of fuel on them when they hit the towers.
They didn't randomly pick a flight the chose the aircraft that would cause the biggest devastation.

For them I doubt for one second they'd think that the towers would collapse,to them that was a bonus
------
So more fuel at the point of impact meaning even more sever damage at impact. No way the buildings structure becomes uniformly weakened.

posted on 12/9/17

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 12/9/17

You're an ex-army know all bully who would get a smack in real life if you acted like you do on here.

................

It just doesn't happen kid.

Probably because stupidity like what you display on here is usually kept on the internet. very rarely do I come across idiocy at your level in real life.

It is probably why you have to try and hide by changing your name, so often.

posted on 12/9/17

--------------------------------------------------------------------
And yet after 16 years and a day not one of the conspirators has broken their silence.Remarkable in this day and age with hacking at industrial levels has no one found any evidence pointing the finger at the government or agencies within
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nobody has been directly found guilty of the Iraq war either but a war was started on the basis of WMDs in a country which evidently didn't have any.


posted on 12/9/17

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Page 7 of 13

Sign in if you want to comment