or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 16 comments are related to an article called:

Silva Watch

Page 1 of 1

posted on 29/12/17

He’s not available until the Cup match. Won’t be registered until Tuesday.

posted on 29/12/17

Another delay already!

posted on 29/12/17

He should be fit, should know his team mates and once his registration is sorted why wouldn’t he be ready!

posted on 29/12/17

Surly the paperwork Will be faxed by 14 seconds past midnight on the first day

posted on 29/12/17

comment by dublin fox (was london fox)(now Cambridge fox)(can not spell fox) (U1131)
posted 16 minutes ago
Surly the paperwork Will be faxed by 14 seconds past midnight on the first day
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its not like there not expecting it or actually read it all already
Should be sitting on top of desk next to the rubber stamp box
Cleared by 00:00:28 🙄🙃

posted on 29/12/17

Even if the guy is not in the next couple of games I would have him sitting on the bench. Not as a sub of course but to see how slimani feels. Should give him the incentive to knuckle down the Leicester way.

posted on 29/12/17

I expect to see a much improved performance from our beloved DoF.

So I'm half anticipating the ongoing saga being Silva registered merely 10 seconds too late next week to play in the Cup match!

posted on 29/12/17

Do you really think our DoF will be sober enough to operate any machines in the office before the 10th of January?
Delusional !! 🙄
Any way he's probably on annual leave until
25th 🙃😛

posted on 29/12/17

If Mahrez goes he will be in the team sooner than you think!?

posted on 29/12/17

Our D o F should be made to explain what exactly he has been doing for last eight months.
He should have been held to account for his failings,

posted on 29/12/17

Getting in a new manager thats turned the team round Thorney people can only see the bad a bit like you and ref's

posted on 29/12/17

Nev,was it him that recruited Puel?
Not sure it was? Are you?
Bit of an assumption there I think.

posted on 29/12/17

comment by thorneyfox (U5061)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
Nev,was it him that recruited Puel?
Not sure it was? Are you?
Bit of an assumption there I think.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But equally almost everyone making an assumption it's his fault on the midfield situation. I think whoever decided on keeping Matty James made a bad judgement call (even if in my heart I wanted to see him given a chance). I suspect if may be one of the things that put CS on a sticky wicket but obviously no way to prove it, based on DOFs generally asking the manager before selling a player. That's a salary and squad place we could have used in a transfer earlier in the window when there was interest in him (rather than DD rift at the end of the window). Easy to look back now though as he may never have got injured...

posted on 29/12/17

if you ask me everyone is making assumptions regarding Rudkin. The owners surely pick their managers, the manager surely his targets, and negotiations are surely carried out within an agreed pay structure level.
So in the words of a well loved comic
"He's a PUPPET"

posted on 29/12/17

So the owners know every manager out there come on they are not football people so you are wrong they relly on recommendations and that's going to come from their DoF. So iknow it hurts but he might just have more to do with it than you like.

posted on 29/12/17

I'm sure that as a board of directors they draw up a short list of managers they would like to talk to. There will then be a interview panel and when the decision is made DofF will negotiate terms etc.
Similar processes will take place with players.
So yes DofF will have and opinions but it will not be his end decision therefore shouldn't be made the fall guy.

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment