or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 5866 comments are related to an article called:

Rate the last film you watched.

Page 86 of 235

posted on 10/1/20

The Water Diviner - 8/10

comment by GOODBYE (U1029)

posted on 10/1/20

Once Upon A Time in Hollywood

7/10

posted on 10/1/20

Some Like It Hot 8/10

posted on 10/1/20

The Manchurian Candidate (1962) - 8.5/10

comment by GOODBYE (U1029)

posted on 10/1/20

Tag

1/10

posted on 10/1/20

Artic Apocalypse 0/10

Absolute joke of a film, filmed on someones phone and the acting is horrendous

I usually wouldn't entertain this shat and switch off but It was just so bad I couldn't switch it off!

Worth a watch just to see how bad it is

posted on 10/1/20

comment by THudd : The Special One (U1029)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
Tag

1/10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nice knowing you mate.

posted on 10/1/20

comment by Mike (U1170)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by THudd : The Special One (U1029)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
Tag

1/10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nice knowing you mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was going to watch it tonight

posted on 10/1/20

True Romance

9/10

posted on 10/1/20

Request to change the bottom half of the grading scale please, they're too generous

4 - sub par
3 - bad
2 - awful
1 - terrible

posted on 11/1/20

maleficent 2- 6/10
Rambo-last blood- 7/10

comment by Spurtle (U1608)

posted on 11/1/20

Star Wars: The Rise of the Skywalker - 6.5/10

posted on 11/1/20

Us 6/10 daft film with the worlds worst father. Kid makes his doppelgänger go into the fire yet the father is off at the beach, not paying attention. Bad scripting.

comment by GOODBYE (U1029)

posted on 13/1/20

The Gentleman

7/10

posted on 13/1/20

A Quiet Place - 6/10

posted on 13/1/20

comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 1 day, 21 hours ago
Star Wars: The Rise of the Skywalker - 6.5/10
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That’s generous. I thought it was dreadful. 3.5/10

posted on 13/1/20

Also apparently 1917 is quality

comment by Hengy (U9129)

posted on 13/1/20

We don’t deal with apparently here palmers

comment by Hengy (U9129)

posted on 13/1/20

comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 2 days ago
Request to change the bottom half of the grading scale please, they're too generous

4 - sub par
3 - bad
2 - awful
1 - terrible
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Noted

posted on 13/1/20

comment by MKspur (U9129)
posted 4 minutes ago
We don’t deal with apparently here palmers
----------------------------------------------------------------------



I will have to watch it then Hengy

posted on 13/1/20

Paddington 2 - 7/10 - I liked it, but I still don't think it was as good as the first film (I know I'm in the minority). But I do like that we have a live action family movie, very few of them about

Bumblebee 6/10 - The 1st 10 minutes are absolutely amazing, unfortunately it falls off a cliff after that. It was less juvenile than the other movies and I liked the 80s setting, but some really bland characters made it seem unnecessary

Dumbo - 5.5/10 - This movie was hardly about Dumbo, it was mainly about a girl (actually so was Bumblebee). There were some cool scenes and it was a watchable kids movie, but a Dumbo movie should be about Dumbo and this isn't.

posted on 13/1/20

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 13/1/20

comment by JustTrue (U13155)
posted 9 hours, 3 minutes ago
Paddington 2 - 7/10 - I liked it, but I still don't think it was as good as the first film (I know I'm in the minority). But I do like that we have a live action family movie, very few of them about
----------------------------------------------------------------------

They’re two of the best family films I’ve seen in years.

Highly recommend.

posted on 13/1/20

Rambo (reboot one) 7/10. Must be the highest body count of any film I’ve ever seen. Rambo on the 50cal, that was brutal.

posted on 13/1/20

comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 3 days, 3 hours ago
Request to change the bottom half of the grading scale please, they're too generous

4 - sub par
3 - bad
2 - awful
1 - terrible
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s up to OP. What I would say however is that the metro scale works on the basis that each ranking is distinguishable from its neighbouring number - whereas your suggestion of ‘Awful’ and ‘terrible’ for example, are essentially the same thing.

Page 86 of 235

Sign in if you want to comment