Robbed ? na not buying that. Was very clever from Ferrari, they called it perfectly. There needed to be the safety car from where the Haas was, nothing else they could do they tried to do it under yellows I believe but they needed the crane. Just one of those things, swings and roundabouts.
The no 1 problem with F1 no ifs no buts is the reliance on downforce. Its been the problem for 5/6 years at least now. Cars just cannot follow each other, its so sad. Gone are the days of seeing cars nose to tail. Anywhere within 1.5 secs of the car infront destroys the tyres and brakes and just ruins the racing.
Give them far less downforce especially at the front. Compensate by giving them better tyres and watch the racing improve ten fold. Everyone knows it and its what the fans and drivers desperately want
Hamilton robbed.
Page 1 of 1
posted on 26/3/18
agreed
posted on 26/3/18
There's always gonna be some that gain from a safety car
posted on 26/3/18
Why would Mercedes come out with the software story if they simply could blame the safety car
posted on 26/3/18
Robbed ? na not buying that. Was very clever from Ferrari, they called it perfectly. There needed to be the safety car from where the Haas was, nothing else they could do they tried to do it under yellows I believe but they needed the crane. Just one of those things, swings and roundabouts.
The no 1 problem with F1 no ifs no buts is the reliance on downforce. Its been the problem for 5/6 years at least now. Cars just cannot follow each other, its so sad. Gone are the days of seeing cars nose to tail. Anywhere within 1.5 secs of the car infront destroys the tyres and brakes and just ruins the racing.
Give them far less downforce especially at the front. Compensate by giving them better tyres and watch the racing improve ten fold. Everyone knows it and its what the fans and drivers desperately want
posted on 4/4/18
Hamilton benefited from the VSC in Barcelona last year. Swings and roundabouts
Page 1 of 1