or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 591 comments are related to an article called:

Hibs to be cited for “Hvn Scvm” banner

Page 1 of 24

posted on 14/5/18

Where in the report does it mention sectarianism?

posted on 14/5/18

We dont care

posted on 14/5/18

Good. Quite right too.

Now I hope they have the balls to go after Celtic, Rangers and Hearts for their song books and banners.

posted on 14/5/18

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
Where in the report does it mention sectarianism?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

“Hvn scvm” not sectarian enough for you ?

posted on 14/5/18

While the bears continue to ignore the sectarian abuse aimed at the Hibs manager

Aye bit

posted on 14/5/18

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 23 seconds ago
Good. Quite right too.

Now I hope they have the balls to go after Celtic, Rangers and Hearts for their song books and banners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Absolutely. As I said, it’s not a one way street 👍

posted on 14/5/18

comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is 😎 (U8215)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
Where in the report does it mention sectarianism?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

“Hvn scvm” not sectarian enough for you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think it’s classed legally as sectarian. Offensive? More than likely.

posted on 14/5/18

comment by Call Sign: 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Armstr... (U3627)
posted 28 seconds ago
While the bears continue to ignore the sectarian abuse aimed at the Hibs manager

Aye bit
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Where is it being ignored ? I said it’s not a one way street.

They’re being rightfully sighted for a sectarian & offensive banner

posted on 14/5/18

*cited

posted on 14/5/18

Comment deleted by Article Creator

posted on 14/5/18

comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is 😎 (U8215)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Call Sign: 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Armstr... (U3627)
posted 28 seconds ago
While the bears continue to ignore the sectarian abuse aimed at the Hibs manager

Aye bit
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Where is it being ignored ? I said it’s not a one way street.

They’re being rightfully sighted for a sectarian & offensive banner

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Aye bit Hibs

posted on 14/5/18

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is 😎 (U8215)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
Where in the report does it mention sectarianism?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

“Hvn scvm” not sectarian enough for you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think it’s classed legally as sectarian. Offensive? More than likely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s sectarian

Ask Nil by Mouth 👍

posted on 14/5/18

Btw-the only mention of sectarianism is in relation to the alleged abuse aimed at Lennon. The banner is described as offensive.

Weird you don’t mention that bit.

posted on 14/5/18

Sadinoel what an utter ar5ehole comment

posted on 14/5/18

Comment deleted by Article Creator

posted on 14/5/18

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 12 seconds ago
Btw-the only mention of sectarianism is in relation to the alleged abuse aimed at Lennon. The banner is described as offensive.

Weird you don’t mention that bit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m referring to the report ffs. It’s clear. But u batter aaay

It’s not a one way street as was made out at the weekend. That’s balance for you 👍

posted on 14/5/18

comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is 😎 (U8215)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is 😎 (U8215)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
Where in the report does it mention sectarianism?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

“Hvn scvm” not sectarian enough for you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think it’s classed legally as sectarian. Offensive? More than likely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s sectarian

Ask Nil by Mouth 👍

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do they now decide legal definitions then?!

posted on 14/5/18

What an utter @rsehole thread


Dry yer eyes

posted on 14/5/18

comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is 😎 (U8215)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 12 seconds ago
Btw-the only mention of sectarianism is in relation to the alleged abuse aimed at Lennon. The banner is described as offensive.

Weird you don’t mention that bit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m referring to the report ffs. It’s clear. But u batter aaay

It’s not a one way street as was made out at the weekend. That’s balance for you 👍

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m confused. The report clearly mentions an offensive banner, but does state about alleged sectarian singing by Gers fans.

You seem to be either confused or making things up.

posted on 14/5/18

Comment deleted by Article Creator

posted on 14/5/18

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is 😎 (U8215)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is 😎 (U8215)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
Where in the report does it mention sectarianism?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

“Hvn scvm” not sectarian enough for you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think it’s classed legally as sectarian. Offensive? More than likely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s sectarian

Ask Nil by Mouth 👍

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do they now decide legal definitions then?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes 👍

http://nilbymouth.org/history/

posted on 14/5/18

even the madman Lennon used sectarianism it as an excuse for thinking he was an aeroplane lol

it only works one way tho esc

posted on 14/5/18

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is 😎 (U8215)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 12 seconds ago
Btw-the only mention of sectarianism is in relation to the alleged abuse aimed at Lennon. The banner is described as offensive.

Weird you don’t mention that bit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m referring to the report ffs. It’s clear. But u batter aaay

It’s not a one way street as was made out at the weekend. That’s balance for you 👍

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m confused. The report clearly mentions an offensive banner, but does state about alleged sectarian singing by Gers fans.

You seem to be either confused or making things up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

“Offensive sectarian language is still used in Scotland on a daily basis, with abusive terms such as “Hvn” and “Orange bastirt” being used negatively against Protestants (or those perceived to be) and others “

posted on 14/5/18

Escy

Can't be ersed reading the whole thread, but why didn't the OP report on all the sectarianism at that game. I'm sure we'd all love to see you criticising the bears who were baiting Neil with their bile.

Or are going to do an Arsene Wenger style "I did not see anything"?

posted on 14/5/18



Couple of things-firstly, they don’t decide legal definitions. Secondly, you’re by their definition a sectarian ar5ehole because you use the word ‘tim’.

Should have read the report first. There’s a lot of folk on here who, apparently because Nil By Mouth said it, regularly use sectarian language.

Page 1 of 24

Sign in if you want to comment