Yeah sure I'll just whip out my billionaire rolodex
CMC paid £265M for 13% of Manchester City last year.
City don't even own their ground, never mind one in West London.
RA would easily sell Chelsea for a profit.
comment by Scarf (U21116)
posted 1 hour ago
CMC paid £265M for 13% of Manchester City last year.
City don't even own their ground, never mind one in West London.
RA would easily sell Chelsea for a profit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scarf knows his onions
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Division 2 is a bit over the top but over taken by Wolves looks likely
I thought a decent comedy show on a Saturday night was a thing of the past.
Thanks for last week!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Scarf.
Chelsea do not own the ground they play on. The shares for the ground were split up amongst fans to prevent developers getting their hands on it. In other words, the fact it is in West London is irrelevant. Might as well be Scunthorpe in terms of its resale value.
Replace ground with pitch.
Thanks for the clarification
Is this incorrect then? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelsea_Pitch_Owners
comment by SB&S (U17757)
posted 3 hours, 20 minutes ago
Scarf.
Chelsea do not own the ground they play on. The shares for the ground were split up amongst fans to prevent developers getting their hands on it. In other words, the fact it is in West London is irrelevant. Might as well be Scunthorpe in terms of its resale value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What utter tripe. That area of London has THE most expensive real estate in the entire Country, comparing it to Scunthorpe (or even Tottenham for that matter) is a joke.
Also the fans own the pitch, do you seriously think that they are not going to be aligned with the Club's best interests?
comment by SB&S (U17757)
posted 2 hours, 43 minutes ago
Is this incorrect then? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelsea_Pitch_Owners
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it says ground and not pitch then yes.
Chelsea, my point was that Chelsea didn't own the ground meaning it has no real value to the business so it might as well be Scunthorpe. The real estate value is owned by fans.
SB&S, to me it's the same thing though. The CPO are there purely to represent the Club's best interests and if the Club's best interests in the future are for it to be sold for a huge amount then the Pitch Owners will ensure that it will happen. People didn't buy those shares to speculate or make money, they bought them because they care about what happens to their Club after the asset strippers tried to fack the Club over in 1983.
Opposition fans often think that because the Club itself doesn't own the pitch, that we are in danger from a potentially hostile Landlord, but we know that our Club is in safe hands and are quite comfortable with the arrangement. Thats why Bates arranged it like that, to stop rogue directors selling the Club down the river.
Sign in if you want to comment
Chelsea now just a holding operation?
Page 2 of 2
posted on 31/5/18
Yeah sure I'll just whip out my billionaire rolodex
posted on 31/5/18
CMC paid £265M for 13% of Manchester City last year.
City don't even own their ground, never mind one in West London.
RA would easily sell Chelsea for a profit.
posted on 31/5/18
comment by Scarf (U21116)
posted 1 hour ago
CMC paid £265M for 13% of Manchester City last year.
City don't even own their ground, never mind one in West London.
RA would easily sell Chelsea for a profit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scarf knows his onions
posted on 31/5/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/5/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/5/18
Division 2 is a bit over the top but over taken by Wolves looks likely
posted on 31/5/18
I thought a decent comedy show on a Saturday night was a thing of the past.
Thanks for last week!
posted on 31/5/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/5/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/5/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/5/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/6/18
Scarf.
Chelsea do not own the ground they play on. The shares for the ground were split up amongst fans to prevent developers getting their hands on it. In other words, the fact it is in West London is irrelevant. Might as well be Scunthorpe in terms of its resale value.
posted on 1/6/18
Replace ground with pitch.
posted on 1/6/18
I stand corrected.
posted on 1/6/18
Thanks for the clarification
posted on 1/6/18
Is this incorrect then? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelsea_Pitch_Owners
posted on 1/6/18
comment by SB&S (U17757)
posted 3 hours, 20 minutes ago
Scarf.
Chelsea do not own the ground they play on. The shares for the ground were split up amongst fans to prevent developers getting their hands on it. In other words, the fact it is in West London is irrelevant. Might as well be Scunthorpe in terms of its resale value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What utter tripe. That area of London has THE most expensive real estate in the entire Country, comparing it to Scunthorpe (or even Tottenham for that matter) is a joke.
Also the fans own the pitch, do you seriously think that they are not going to be aligned with the Club's best interests?
posted on 1/6/18
comment by SB&S (U17757)
posted 2 hours, 43 minutes ago
Is this incorrect then? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelsea_Pitch_Owners
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it says ground and not pitch then yes.
posted on 1/6/18
Chelsea, my point was that Chelsea didn't own the ground meaning it has no real value to the business so it might as well be Scunthorpe. The real estate value is owned by fans.
posted on 1/6/18
SB&S, to me it's the same thing though. The CPO are there purely to represent the Club's best interests and if the Club's best interests in the future are for it to be sold for a huge amount then the Pitch Owners will ensure that it will happen. People didn't buy those shares to speculate or make money, they bought them because they care about what happens to their Club after the asset strippers tried to fack the Club over in 1983.
Opposition fans often think that because the Club itself doesn't own the pitch, that we are in danger from a potentially hostile Landlord, but we know that our Club is in safe hands and are quite comfortable with the arrangement. Thats why Bates arranged it like that, to stop rogue directors selling the Club down the river.
Page 2 of 2