The fact that you need to write a wum containing 628 words shows your insecurity and inferiority as a Spurs fan towards Arsenal.
Definitely bigger for Arsenal than Spurs these days. Always a big derby, but I don`t get nearly as excited about it as I used to. Spurs usually beat them at home these days, so nothing really for the Arsenal fans to go overboard about.
I have a feeling they are going to come down to earth with a bump tonight. They have as bad a record at Old Trafford as Spurs have at the Emirates.
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 5 minutes ago
The fact that you need to write a wum containing 628 words shows your insecurity and inferiority as a Spurs fan towards Arsenal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mostly copied and pasted - not hard.
Gotta love the deluded toy tots. Never a more hilariously smug club for achieving nothing.
Whatever helps you lot sleep at night
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 1 minute ago
Gotta love the deluded toy tots.Never a more hilariously smug club for achieving nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How about answering the question and contributing to the debate rather than making posts like that. Do your agree or disagree? Why?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 20 seconds ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in other words, you agree with me that it used to be a much bigger game for us than it was for you.
Have to disagree with the Chelsea v Fulham comparison, it's always been a much more intense rivalry than that. Fulham have spent most of their history in the lower leagues of English Football.
Also, I don't think we have to be competing with the best team in PL history for my thoughts to be true. I've already said in the article that it's bigger for you than it is us, albeit to a lesser extent than when it was the other way round.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 minutes ago
Gotta love the deluded toy tots.Never a more hilariously smug club for achieving nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er well I have seen them win 14 trophies for a start, and they won trophies before I was watching them. So total nonsense you have just posted. But then that is to be expected from you.
And grow up FFS toy tots is the sort of words a five year old would use.
comment by TTliv87 (U11882)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 3 minutes ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lmao look at this deluded Arsefan. Spurs have bigger fish to fry like putting the pressure on City, bottling it and finishing 4th while Arsenal languish in 3rd place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We absolutely do have bigger Fish to try - Barcelona. Not sure why you're being sarcastic.
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 7 minutes ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs are a CL club now, Arsenal are a Europa League club, don`t let facts get in the way of your stupidity. I remember you lot banging on about how CL was the absolute pinnacle of football, and how Spurs would never be in it. Well we are and Arsenal are not. So what went wrong?
Sheriff mugging himself off as usual. He is a very bitter poster.
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 18 minutes ago
Gotta love the deluded toy tots.Never a more hilariously smug club for achieving nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Come on man, we're all adults here, aren't we? "Insults" like "toy tots" just make you look like you're 8 years old... Seriously, grow up mate!
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 20 seconds ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in other words, you agree with me that it used to be a much bigger game for us than it was for you.
Have to disagree with the Chelsea v Fulham comparison, it's always been a much more intense rivalry than that. Fulham have spent most of their history in the lower leagues of English Football.
Also, I don't think we have to be competing with the best team in PL history for my thoughts to be true. I've already said in the article that it's bigger for you than it is us, albeit to a lesser extent than when it was the other way round.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you measure who it is "bigger" for? It's a meaningless, delusional, ego-massaging claim. I guess any coping mechanism after getting battered is alright. One minute, they're eambling about the "library" and lack of passion and empty seats and blah, blah...... The next, they're rambling about the passion of the fans and how it somehow proves we're a small club. Which is it? How is it meant to be surprising that we celebrated a derby win more than the typical matches?
comment by sandy YNWA (U20567)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 7 minutes ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs are a CL club now, Arsenal are a Europa League club, don`t let facts get in the way of your stupidity. I remember you lot banging on about how CL was the absolute pinnacle of football, and how Spurs would never be in it. Well we are and Arsenal are not. So what went wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I remember when Spurs won the League Cup in 2008 and fans tried to use that to somehow to imply they accomplished more than us for winning a trophy we always played reserves in. Mugs like you claimed they'd rather win "something" than play in the CL. Funny how you've all flipped now and shown how phony you were isn't it?
As for Europa club, you do know you'll be joining us there for the knockout phase, right?
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 20 seconds ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in other words, you agree with me that it used to be a much bigger game for us than it was for you.
Have to disagree with the Chelsea v Fulham comparison, it's always been a much more intense rivalry than that. Fulham have spent most of their history in the lower leagues of English Football.
Also, I don't think we have to be competing with the best team in PL history for my thoughts to be true. I've already said in the article that it's bigger for you than it is us, albeit to a lesser extent than when it was the other way round.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you measure who it is "bigger" for? It's a meaningless, delusional, ego-massaging claim. I guess any coping mechanism after getting battered is alright.One minute, they're eambling about the "library" and lack of passion and empty seats and blah, blah...... The next, they're rambling about the passion of the fans and how it somehow proves we're a small club. Which is it? How is it meant to be surprising that we celebrated a derby win more than the typical matches?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see why it's meaningless, this is a forum to discuss anything about Football. I seemed to have hit a nerve.
The conclusion of your article is ridiculously stupid.
comment by Samir (U2630)
posted 19 seconds ago
The conclusion of your article is ridiculously stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's wrong about it?
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 20 seconds ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in other words, you agree with me that it used to be a much bigger game for us than it was for you.
Have to disagree with the Chelsea v Fulham comparison, it's always been a much more intense rivalry than that. Fulham have spent most of their history in the lower leagues of English Football.
Also, I don't think we have to be competing with the best team in PL history for my thoughts to be true. I've already said in the article that it's bigger for you than it is us, albeit to a lesser extent than when it was the other way round.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you measure who it is "bigger" for? It's a meaningless, delusional, ego-massaging claim. I guess any coping mechanism after getting battered is alright.One minute, they're eambling about the "library" and lack of passion and empty seats and blah, blah...... The next, they're rambling about the passion of the fans and how it somehow proves we're a small club. Which is it? How is it meant to be surprising that we celebrated a derby win more than the typical matches?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see why it's meaningless, this is a forum to discuss anything about Football. I seemed to have hit a nerve.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More like getting battered on Sunday seems to have hit a nerve.
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 20 seconds ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in other words, you agree with me that it used to be a much bigger game for us than it was for you.
Have to disagree with the Chelsea v Fulham comparison, it's always been a much more intense rivalry than that. Fulham have spent most of their history in the lower leagues of English Football.
Also, I don't think we have to be competing with the best team in PL history for my thoughts to be true. I've already said in the article that it's bigger for you than it is us, albeit to a lesser extent than when it was the other way round.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you measure who it is "bigger" for? It's a meaningless, delusional, ego-massaging claim. I guess any coping mechanism after getting battered is alright.One minute, they're eambling about the "library" and lack of passion and empty seats and blah, blah...... The next, they're rambling about the passion of the fans and how it somehow proves we're a small club. Which is it? How is it meant to be surprising that we celebrated a derby win more than the typical matches?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see why it's meaningless, this is a forum to discuss anything about Football. I seemed to have hit a nerve.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More like getting battered on Sunday seems to have hit a nerve.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah it was pretty gutting but I'm over it now, you're the only one wound up here.
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 20 seconds ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in other words, you agree with me that it used to be a much bigger game for us than it was for you.
Have to disagree with the Chelsea v Fulham comparison, it's always been a much more intense rivalry than that. Fulham have spent most of their history in the lower leagues of English Football.
Also, I don't think we have to be competing with the best team in PL history for my thoughts to be true. I've already said in the article that it's bigger for you than it is us, albeit to a lesser extent than when it was the other way round.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you measure who it is "bigger" for? It's a meaningless, delusional, ego-massaging claim. I guess any coping mechanism after getting battered is alright.One minute, they're eambling about the "library" and lack of passion and empty seats and blah, blah...... The next, they're rambling about the passion of the fans and how it somehow proves we're a small club. Which is it? How is it meant to be surprising that we celebrated a derby win more than the typical matches?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see why it's meaningless, this is a forum to discuss anything about Football. I seemed to have hit a nerve.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More like getting battered on Sunday seems to have hit a nerve.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah it was pretty gutting but I'm over it now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article proves you're not.
Come on Sheriff you're better than this, starting to think you agree with me but can't bring yourself to admit it.
Sign in if you want to comment
NLD: Bigger for Arsenal than Spurs?
Page 1 of 3
posted on 5/12/18
It shouldn’t be
posted on 5/12/18
The fact that you need to write a wum containing 628 words shows your insecurity and inferiority as a Spurs fan towards Arsenal.
posted on 5/12/18
Definitely bigger for Arsenal than Spurs these days. Always a big derby, but I don`t get nearly as excited about it as I used to. Spurs usually beat them at home these days, so nothing really for the Arsenal fans to go overboard about.
I have a feeling they are going to come down to earth with a bump tonight. They have as bad a record at Old Trafford as Spurs have at the Emirates.
posted on 5/12/18
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 5 minutes ago
The fact that you need to write a wum containing 628 words shows your insecurity and inferiority as a Spurs fan towards Arsenal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mostly copied and pasted - not hard.
posted on 5/12/18
Gotta love the deluded toy tots. Never a more hilariously smug club for achieving nothing.
posted on 5/12/18
Whatever helps you lot sleep at night
posted on 5/12/18
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 1 minute ago
Gotta love the deluded toy tots.Never a more hilariously smug club for achieving nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How about answering the question and contributing to the debate rather than making posts like that. Do your agree or disagree? Why?
posted on 5/12/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 5/12/18
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
posted on 5/12/18
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 20 seconds ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in other words, you agree with me that it used to be a much bigger game for us than it was for you.
Have to disagree with the Chelsea v Fulham comparison, it's always been a much more intense rivalry than that. Fulham have spent most of their history in the lower leagues of English Football.
Also, I don't think we have to be competing with the best team in PL history for my thoughts to be true. I've already said in the article that it's bigger for you than it is us, albeit to a lesser extent than when it was the other way round.
posted on 5/12/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 5/12/18
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 minutes ago
Gotta love the deluded toy tots.Never a more hilariously smug club for achieving nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er well I have seen them win 14 trophies for a start, and they won trophies before I was watching them. So total nonsense you have just posted. But then that is to be expected from you.
And grow up FFS toy tots is the sort of words a five year old would use.
posted on 5/12/18
comment by TTliv87 (U11882)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 3 minutes ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lmao look at this deluded Arsefan. Spurs have bigger fish to fry like putting the pressure on City, bottling it and finishing 4th while Arsenal languish in 3rd place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We absolutely do have bigger Fish to try - Barcelona. Not sure why you're being sarcastic.
posted on 5/12/18
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 7 minutes ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs are a CL club now, Arsenal are a Europa League club, don`t let facts get in the way of your stupidity. I remember you lot banging on about how CL was the absolute pinnacle of football, and how Spurs would never be in it. Well we are and Arsenal are not. So what went wrong?
posted on 5/12/18
Sheriff mugging himself off as usual. He is a very bitter poster.
posted on 5/12/18
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 18 minutes ago
Gotta love the deluded toy tots.Never a more hilariously smug club for achieving nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Come on man, we're all adults here, aren't we? "Insults" like "toy tots" just make you look like you're 8 years old... Seriously, grow up mate!
posted on 5/12/18
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 20 seconds ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in other words, you agree with me that it used to be a much bigger game for us than it was for you.
Have to disagree with the Chelsea v Fulham comparison, it's always been a much more intense rivalry than that. Fulham have spent most of their history in the lower leagues of English Football.
Also, I don't think we have to be competing with the best team in PL history for my thoughts to be true. I've already said in the article that it's bigger for you than it is us, albeit to a lesser extent than when it was the other way round.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you measure who it is "bigger" for? It's a meaningless, delusional, ego-massaging claim. I guess any coping mechanism after getting battered is alright. One minute, they're eambling about the "library" and lack of passion and empty seats and blah, blah...... The next, they're rambling about the passion of the fans and how it somehow proves we're a small club. Which is it? How is it meant to be surprising that we celebrated a derby win more than the typical matches?
posted on 5/12/18
comment by sandy YNWA (U20567)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 7 minutes ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs are a CL club now, Arsenal are a Europa League club, don`t let facts get in the way of your stupidity. I remember you lot banging on about how CL was the absolute pinnacle of football, and how Spurs would never be in it. Well we are and Arsenal are not. So what went wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I remember when Spurs won the League Cup in 2008 and fans tried to use that to somehow to imply they accomplished more than us for winning a trophy we always played reserves in. Mugs like you claimed they'd rather win "something" than play in the CL. Funny how you've all flipped now and shown how phony you were isn't it?
As for Europa club, you do know you'll be joining us there for the knockout phase, right?
posted on 5/12/18
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 20 seconds ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in other words, you agree with me that it used to be a much bigger game for us than it was for you.
Have to disagree with the Chelsea v Fulham comparison, it's always been a much more intense rivalry than that. Fulham have spent most of their history in the lower leagues of English Football.
Also, I don't think we have to be competing with the best team in PL history for my thoughts to be true. I've already said in the article that it's bigger for you than it is us, albeit to a lesser extent than when it was the other way round.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you measure who it is "bigger" for? It's a meaningless, delusional, ego-massaging claim. I guess any coping mechanism after getting battered is alright.One minute, they're eambling about the "library" and lack of passion and empty seats and blah, blah...... The next, they're rambling about the passion of the fans and how it somehow proves we're a small club. Which is it? How is it meant to be surprising that we celebrated a derby win more than the typical matches?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see why it's meaningless, this is a forum to discuss anything about Football. I seemed to have hit a nerve.
posted on 5/12/18
The conclusion of your article is ridiculously stupid.
posted on 5/12/18
comment by Samir (U2630)
posted 19 seconds ago
The conclusion of your article is ridiculously stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's wrong about it?
posted on 5/12/18
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 20 seconds ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in other words, you agree with me that it used to be a much bigger game for us than it was for you.
Have to disagree with the Chelsea v Fulham comparison, it's always been a much more intense rivalry than that. Fulham have spent most of their history in the lower leagues of English Football.
Also, I don't think we have to be competing with the best team in PL history for my thoughts to be true. I've already said in the article that it's bigger for you than it is us, albeit to a lesser extent than when it was the other way round.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you measure who it is "bigger" for? It's a meaningless, delusional, ego-massaging claim. I guess any coping mechanism after getting battered is alright.One minute, they're eambling about the "library" and lack of passion and empty seats and blah, blah...... The next, they're rambling about the passion of the fans and how it somehow proves we're a small club. Which is it? How is it meant to be surprising that we celebrated a derby win more than the typical matches?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see why it's meaningless, this is a forum to discuss anything about Football. I seemed to have hit a nerve.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More like getting battered on Sunday seems to have hit a nerve.
posted on 5/12/18
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 20 seconds ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in other words, you agree with me that it used to be a much bigger game for us than it was for you.
Have to disagree with the Chelsea v Fulham comparison, it's always been a much more intense rivalry than that. Fulham have spent most of their history in the lower leagues of English Football.
Also, I don't think we have to be competing with the best team in PL history for my thoughts to be true. I've already said in the article that it's bigger for you than it is us, albeit to a lesser extent than when it was the other way round.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you measure who it is "bigger" for? It's a meaningless, delusional, ego-massaging claim. I guess any coping mechanism after getting battered is alright.One minute, they're eambling about the "library" and lack of passion and empty seats and blah, blah...... The next, they're rambling about the passion of the fans and how it somehow proves we're a small club. Which is it? How is it meant to be surprising that we celebrated a derby win more than the typical matches?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see why it's meaningless, this is a forum to discuss anything about Football. I seemed to have hit a nerve.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More like getting battered on Sunday seems to have hit a nerve.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah it was pretty gutting but I'm over it now, you're the only one wound up here.
posted on 5/12/18
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 20 seconds ago
Thing is your claims don't really make sense. When Arsenal used to fight for the title in Wenger's first decade at the club, the Spurs-Arsenal rivalry was about the same as Chelsea-Fulham. The fixtures we looked out for was Man U and later on Chelsea. Obviously, since thereabouts 2006 onwards, Spurs competing for top 4 as we sank lower elevated the relevance and intensity of the rivalry. Your comments would only make sense if Spurs were somehow competing with the likes of City, but you're not. Your objectives are pretty much the same as ours. So to try to portray the derby as somehow more important for Arsenal (as if you somehow have bigger fish to fry) is as I said, some hilarious level of delusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in other words, you agree with me that it used to be a much bigger game for us than it was for you.
Have to disagree with the Chelsea v Fulham comparison, it's always been a much more intense rivalry than that. Fulham have spent most of their history in the lower leagues of English Football.
Also, I don't think we have to be competing with the best team in PL history for my thoughts to be true. I've already said in the article that it's bigger for you than it is us, albeit to a lesser extent than when it was the other way round.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you measure who it is "bigger" for? It's a meaningless, delusional, ego-massaging claim. I guess any coping mechanism after getting battered is alright.One minute, they're eambling about the "library" and lack of passion and empty seats and blah, blah...... The next, they're rambling about the passion of the fans and how it somehow proves we're a small club. Which is it? How is it meant to be surprising that we celebrated a derby win more than the typical matches?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see why it's meaningless, this is a forum to discuss anything about Football. I seemed to have hit a nerve.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More like getting battered on Sunday seems to have hit a nerve.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah it was pretty gutting but I'm over it now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article proves you're not.
posted on 5/12/18
Come on Sheriff you're better than this, starting to think you agree with me but can't bring yourself to admit it.
Page 1 of 3