This is the cutest thread ever
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 2 minutes ago
This is the cutest thread ever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
4-0 today on the attacking front, with all that money you’ve spent as well
As much as I'd still prefer the Berties to win the title out of the two, at least Liverpool will have earned it if they do it. Haven't had it given to them on a silver platter like the plastic club have.
Either way it will be funny. It's either 29 years for the scousers or Pep failing to retain and thus matching Fergie n Jose.
It’s true, one of them will be the laughing stock
comment by Eric_the_king (SE85) (U21241)
posted 19 seconds ago
As much as I'd still prefer the Berties to win the title out of the two, at least Liverpool will have earned it if they do it. Haven't had it given to them on a silver platter like the plastic club have.
Either way it will be funny. It's either 29 years for the scousers or Pep failing to retain and thus matching Fergie n Jose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric cool it with this ballocks about ffp. It’s boring. Liverpool gets millions from tv money, all clubs do. Who the Fack cares anymore. It’s all greedy and corrupt every where you look. I couldn’t care less where city or PSG get their money.
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 4 minutes ago
It’s true, one of them will be the laughing stock
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Joining us the even bigger one sadly. However we knew our time would come to an end eventually. But we'll be back.
comment by ‘rd’ - if Kan’ye’ can, so can baz ta’rd’ (U19119)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Eric_the_king (SE85) (U21241)
posted 19 seconds ago
As much as I'd still prefer the Berties to win the title out of the two, at least Liverpool will have earned it if they do it. Haven't had it given to them on a silver platter like the plastic club have.
Either way it will be funny. It's either 29 years for the scousers or Pep failing to retain and thus matching Fergie n Jose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric cool it with this ballocks about ffp. It’s boring. Liverpool gets millions from tv money, all clubs do. Who the Fack cares anymore. It’s all greedy and corrupt every where you look. I couldn’t care less where city or PSG get their money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool get millions from TV deal? City get the same you fool as it's shared plus the other stuff. Not difficult.
If you think Qatar n UAE haven't made the playing field uneven then you're a Muppet. They have spent more money than every club in Europe over last 5 years despite not being remotely the biggest clubs. Of course it matters. It's financial doping.
comment by Eric_the_king (SE85) (U21241)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by ‘rd’ - if Kan’ye’ can, so can baz ta’rd’ (U19119)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Eric_the_king (SE85) (U21241)
posted 19 seconds ago
As much as I'd still prefer the Berties to win the title out of the two, at least Liverpool will have earned it if they do it. Haven't had it given to them on a silver platter like the plastic club have.
Either way it will be funny. It's either 29 years for the scousers or Pep failing to retain and thus matching Fergie n Jose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric cool it with this ballocks about ffp. It’s boring. Liverpool gets millions from tv money, all clubs do. Who the Fack cares anymore. It’s all greedy and corrupt every where you look. I couldn’t care less where city or PSG get their money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool get millions from TV deal? City get the same you fool as it's shared plus the other stuff. Not difficult.
If you think Qatar n UAE haven't made the playing field uneven then you're a Muppet. They have spent more money than every club in Europe over last 5 years despite not being remotely the biggest clubs. Of course it matters. It's financial doping.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t really care. As others have rightly or wrongly alluded too, FFP “appears” to have been designed to keep the establishment rich and disadvantage everyone else. Where they get their money from, I don’t really care. You are correct in that it gives them an advantage, but that’s life mate. Happens in business all the time, and that’s what football is these days.
I don’t really care. As others have rightly or wrongly alluded too, FFP “appears” to have been designed to keep the establishment rich and disadvantage everyone else. Where they get their money from, I don’t really care. You are correct in that it gives them an advantage, but that’s life mate. Happens in business all the time, and that’s what football is these days.
========
What an absolute load of crap.
IMO.
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t really care. As others have rightly or wrongly alluded too, FFP “appears” to have been designed to keep the establishment rich and disadvantage everyone else. Where they get their money from, I don’t really care. You are correct in that it gives them an advantage, but that’s life mate. Happens in business all the time, and that’s what football is these days.
========
What an absolute load of crap.
IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I said, rightly or wrongly....
Let the little rascals have their day. They’ve been so hard done by over recent years, only finishing second, then only challenging for a European spot the year after. Rough times as a football fan 👊
Financial doping isn’t a thing, it’s a phrase that Wenger made up that has been adopted by people that seemingly think it’s real.
Sorry, just irritates me when people use it!
United are yesterday's news.
Any City fan will tell you that the first fixture we look for at the start of the season is now Liverpool.
The first fixture you look for is the oil firm derby
Chelsea were definitely better than Man City yesterday.
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
Financial doping isn’t a thing, it’s a phrase that Wenger made up that has been adopted by people that seemingly think it’s real.
Sorry, just irritates me when people use it!
------
What?
Then what should we call it?
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 34 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
Financial doping isn’t a thing, it’s a phrase that Wenger made up that has been adopted by people that seemingly think it’s real.
Sorry, just irritates me when people use it!
------
What?
Then what should we call it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fecking loves a good argument on the city board this one 😂
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 13 hours, 39 minutes ago
Financial doping isn’t a thing, it’s a phrase that Wenger made up that has been adopted by people that seemingly think it’s real.
Sorry, just irritates me when people use it!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course financial doping is a thing. What else would you call what’s happened to your club over the last decade?
Of course it bloody isn’t, it’s a a stupid term that were it to exist would apply to any club that has ever existed and any form of public or private investment.
I can forgive Wenger a bit as it could be argued it’s a second language thing. Anyone else that uses it is a moron though.
So love love is a moron.
Who knew
Liverpool fans love their history.
I wonder if they think being propped up by the Littlewoods empire was financial doping or just a business investment?
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
Of course it bloody isn’t, it’s a a stupid term that were it to exist would apply to any club that has ever existed and any form of public or private investment.
========
Why?
Financial doping includes City's circumvention of laid down rules which was specific to City and maybe PSG.
In any case, just because it can be applied to other clubs (it can't) doesn't mean its not financial doping.
They changed the rules retrospectively, City didn't break them at the time.
If the case went to an actual court of law it would be thrown out in minutes.
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
Of course it bloody isn’t, it’s a a stupid term that were it to exist would apply to any club that has ever existed and any form of public or private investment.
========
Why?
Financial doping includes City's circumvention of laid down rules which was specific to City and maybe PSG.
In any case, just because it can be applied to other clubs (it can't) doesn't mean its not financial doping.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it doesn’t, he made it up ten years before those rules were even in existence. He meant it to mean any money that came from outside of a football clubs operations, which would mean every club ever has been guilty of it, that’s how stupid it is.
Stupid people have then taken that term (which doesn’t exist) and try to put a definition to it as a way to somehow make out football is any different to any other business, despite those same clubs being the ones that got rid of the rules that actually made it different.
It’s moronic in the extreme.
Sign in if you want to comment
Best team in Manchester?
Page 2 of 4
posted on 8/12/18
This is the cutest thread ever
posted on 8/12/18
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 2 minutes ago
This is the cutest thread ever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
4-0 today on the attacking front, with all that money you’ve spent as well
posted on 8/12/18
As much as I'd still prefer the Berties to win the title out of the two, at least Liverpool will have earned it if they do it. Haven't had it given to them on a silver platter like the plastic club have.
Either way it will be funny. It's either 29 years for the scousers or Pep failing to retain and thus matching Fergie n Jose.
posted on 8/12/18
It’s true, one of them will be the laughing stock
posted on 8/12/18
comment by Eric_the_king (SE85) (U21241)
posted 19 seconds ago
As much as I'd still prefer the Berties to win the title out of the two, at least Liverpool will have earned it if they do it. Haven't had it given to them on a silver platter like the plastic club have.
Either way it will be funny. It's either 29 years for the scousers or Pep failing to retain and thus matching Fergie n Jose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric cool it with this ballocks about ffp. It’s boring. Liverpool gets millions from tv money, all clubs do. Who the Fack cares anymore. It’s all greedy and corrupt every where you look. I couldn’t care less where city or PSG get their money.
posted on 8/12/18
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 4 minutes ago
It’s true, one of them will be the laughing stock
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Joining us the even bigger one sadly. However we knew our time would come to an end eventually. But we'll be back.
posted on 8/12/18
comment by ‘rd’ - if Kan’ye’ can, so can baz ta’rd’ (U19119)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Eric_the_king (SE85) (U21241)
posted 19 seconds ago
As much as I'd still prefer the Berties to win the title out of the two, at least Liverpool will have earned it if they do it. Haven't had it given to them on a silver platter like the plastic club have.
Either way it will be funny. It's either 29 years for the scousers or Pep failing to retain and thus matching Fergie n Jose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric cool it with this ballocks about ffp. It’s boring. Liverpool gets millions from tv money, all clubs do. Who the Fack cares anymore. It’s all greedy and corrupt every where you look. I couldn’t care less where city or PSG get their money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool get millions from TV deal? City get the same you fool as it's shared plus the other stuff. Not difficult.
If you think Qatar n UAE haven't made the playing field uneven then you're a Muppet. They have spent more money than every club in Europe over last 5 years despite not being remotely the biggest clubs. Of course it matters. It's financial doping.
posted on 8/12/18
comment by Eric_the_king (SE85) (U21241)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by ‘rd’ - if Kan’ye’ can, so can baz ta’rd’ (U19119)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Eric_the_king (SE85) (U21241)
posted 19 seconds ago
As much as I'd still prefer the Berties to win the title out of the two, at least Liverpool will have earned it if they do it. Haven't had it given to them on a silver platter like the plastic club have.
Either way it will be funny. It's either 29 years for the scousers or Pep failing to retain and thus matching Fergie n Jose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric cool it with this ballocks about ffp. It’s boring. Liverpool gets millions from tv money, all clubs do. Who the Fack cares anymore. It’s all greedy and corrupt every where you look. I couldn’t care less where city or PSG get their money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool get millions from TV deal? City get the same you fool as it's shared plus the other stuff. Not difficult.
If you think Qatar n UAE haven't made the playing field uneven then you're a Muppet. They have spent more money than every club in Europe over last 5 years despite not being remotely the biggest clubs. Of course it matters. It's financial doping.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t really care. As others have rightly or wrongly alluded too, FFP “appears” to have been designed to keep the establishment rich and disadvantage everyone else. Where they get their money from, I don’t really care. You are correct in that it gives them an advantage, but that’s life mate. Happens in business all the time, and that’s what football is these days.
posted on 8/12/18
I don’t really care. As others have rightly or wrongly alluded too, FFP “appears” to have been designed to keep the establishment rich and disadvantage everyone else. Where they get their money from, I don’t really care. You are correct in that it gives them an advantage, but that’s life mate. Happens in business all the time, and that’s what football is these days.
========
What an absolute load of crap.
IMO.
posted on 8/12/18
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t really care. As others have rightly or wrongly alluded too, FFP “appears” to have been designed to keep the establishment rich and disadvantage everyone else. Where they get their money from, I don’t really care. You are correct in that it gives them an advantage, but that’s life mate. Happens in business all the time, and that’s what football is these days.
========
What an absolute load of crap.
IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I said, rightly or wrongly....
posted on 8/12/18
Let the little rascals have their day. They’ve been so hard done by over recent years, only finishing second, then only challenging for a European spot the year after. Rough times as a football fan 👊
posted on 8/12/18
Financial doping isn’t a thing, it’s a phrase that Wenger made up that has been adopted by people that seemingly think it’s real.
Sorry, just irritates me when people use it!
posted on 8/12/18
United are yesterday's news.
Any City fan will tell you that the first fixture we look for at the start of the season is now Liverpool.
posted on 8/12/18
The first fixture you look for is the oil firm derby
posted on 9/12/18
Good one 🙄
posted on 9/12/18
Chelsea were definitely better than Man City yesterday.
posted on 9/12/18
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
Financial doping isn’t a thing, it’s a phrase that Wenger made up that has been adopted by people that seemingly think it’s real.
Sorry, just irritates me when people use it!
------
What?
Then what should we call it?
posted on 9/12/18
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 34 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
Financial doping isn’t a thing, it’s a phrase that Wenger made up that has been adopted by people that seemingly think it’s real.
Sorry, just irritates me when people use it!
------
What?
Then what should we call it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fecking loves a good argument on the city board this one 😂
posted on 9/12/18
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 13 hours, 39 minutes ago
Financial doping isn’t a thing, it’s a phrase that Wenger made up that has been adopted by people that seemingly think it’s real.
Sorry, just irritates me when people use it!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course financial doping is a thing. What else would you call what’s happened to your club over the last decade?
posted on 9/12/18
Of course it bloody isn’t, it’s a a stupid term that were it to exist would apply to any club that has ever existed and any form of public or private investment.
I can forgive Wenger a bit as it could be argued it’s a second language thing. Anyone else that uses it is a moron though.
posted on 9/12/18
So love love is a moron.
Who knew
posted on 9/12/18
Liverpool fans love their history.
I wonder if they think being propped up by the Littlewoods empire was financial doping or just a business investment?
posted on 9/12/18
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
Of course it bloody isn’t, it’s a a stupid term that were it to exist would apply to any club that has ever existed and any form of public or private investment.
========
Why?
Financial doping includes City's circumvention of laid down rules which was specific to City and maybe PSG.
In any case, just because it can be applied to other clubs (it can't) doesn't mean its not financial doping.
posted on 9/12/18
They changed the rules retrospectively, City didn't break them at the time.
If the case went to an actual court of law it would be thrown out in minutes.
posted on 9/12/18
comment by No Love - Monumentally Dope (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
Of course it bloody isn’t, it’s a a stupid term that were it to exist would apply to any club that has ever existed and any form of public or private investment.
========
Why?
Financial doping includes City's circumvention of laid down rules which was specific to City and maybe PSG.
In any case, just because it can be applied to other clubs (it can't) doesn't mean its not financial doping.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it doesn’t, he made it up ten years before those rules were even in existence. He meant it to mean any money that came from outside of a football clubs operations, which would mean every club ever has been guilty of it, that’s how stupid it is.
Stupid people have then taken that term (which doesn’t exist) and try to put a definition to it as a way to somehow make out football is any different to any other business, despite those same clubs being the ones that got rid of the rules that actually made it different.
It’s moronic in the extreme.
Page 2 of 4