Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

so I'm not up to speed in my firearms spelling Deal with it mutherfeckers

<Independence for Scotland.....it’s coming
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No. That moment has gone forever.>

Bollox it has.

I was No and am now coming round to Yes.

So are many people I know.

I went to pick Zach up at nursery and the wee cant was running about like a maddy, a fookin fat boot said "Stand at peace for yer granda Fat coont

Belter.

Best mate just turned 60 is a beardy Kenny Rodgers lookalike.

Last week was taking his wheelchair bound Da aged 92 into the

Health Centre.

Bumped into a fella he hadn't seen for years who asked him

'this your brother then?

He was stoopit enough to put it up on his facetwaat page.

comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 11 minutes ago
I went to pick Zach up at nursery and the wee cant was running about like a maddy, a fookin fat boot said "Stand at peace for yer granda Fat coont

Belter.

Best mate just turned 60 is a beardy Kenny Rodgers lookalike.

Last week was taking his wheelchair bound Da aged 92 into the

Health Centre.

Bumped into a fella he hadn't seen for years who asked him

'this your brother then?

He was stoopit enough to put it up on his facetwaat page.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a gamble doing that.

comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
<Independence for Scotland.....it’s coming
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No. That moment has gone forever.>

Bollox it has.

I was No and am now coming round to Yes.

So are many people I know.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmm.

So much so that the SNP are snapping at the heels of the government for a revote.

And there is no way any government will allow another referendum for years to come.

And even if they did who’s to say they won’t just fwck about with it for two and a half years and then do everything they can to delay it and eventually overturn it?

Sounds familiar.

What would you feel like then?

As long as nobody cheated by grossly overspending.

I say let the Will of the People prevail!

comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 1 minute ago
As long as nobody cheated by grossly overspending.

I say let the Will of the People prevail!




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Quite.

The will of the people voted to leave.

Oh you mean except those people?

Tainted result.

If it was a football match or an Invigilated Exam.

Jiggerypokery.

Null and void

Oh Kaaaayyyyy then

Not, I suspect your most candid post ever.

comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 13 seconds ago




Not, I suspect your most candid post ever.



----------------------------------------------------------------------



Nope

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Aye, OK, its Subs - what's the fvkkin poi... (U5683)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 16 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
<Independence for Scotland.....it’s coming
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No. That moment has gone forever.>

Bollox it has.

I was No and am now coming round to Yes.

So are many people I know.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmm.

So much so that the SNP are snapping at the heels of the government for a revote.

And there is no way any government will allow another referendum for years to come.

And even if they did who’s to say they won’t just fwck about with it for two and a half years and then do everything they can to delay it and eventually overturn it?

Sounds familiar.

What would you feel like then?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, I see...

We're now drawing comparisons between Indyref (1) in 2014, which had a full govt paper issued, and then hotly debated (including, ironically, plans for EU membership), and 2016, which had apocalypse now form Gideon and the Pig Fvcker Vs what some swivel eyed cvnts stuck on the side of a bus?

Hoardes of Turks and 350 bajillion for the NHS was the Vote Leave core message. Decent drama-doc with Sherlock on recently.

Yeah, that comparison makes a lot of sense

Even leavers in the cabinet can't agree what sort of brexit they voted for now - but aye, sure, they all knew at the time - Cvnts probably just forgot, eh?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nobody put any conditions on how we left though did they? eh? Well?

People who had any concerns whatsoever about something so new with so many unknowns tend to vote for the status quo and in that sense you'd think that would have been to Remain.

Despite that, 17m voted to leave. A decent majority. They were prepared to step into the unknown and take the risk.

Now many are trying to tell them they got it wrong. You honestly couldn't imagine the arrogance if you tried.

The question being how many voted to leave would now change their mind? That's a massive reason why a second vote/referendum/people's vote is being ruled out as it stands. And for the simple reason that there is just as good a chance that even more might vote to leave having seen the most awful deal ever being offered up.

The fwcking audacity of MP's trying to usurp a national referendum is a disgrace and I hope every one of them are thrown out by their constituents at the first time of asking for failing to abide by the law of the land.

There.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Aye, OK, its Subs - what's the fvkkin point!? (U5683)
posted 36 minutes ago
Your hypothesis would hold water if the status quo wasn't painted as something to be feared. Fear and greed. Drives markets. Drives human decision making. Leave successfully tapped into that, but did so with massive lies.

The greed bit was the NHS slogan. A lie disavowed the morning after the result.

The fear bit was the turks. A lie even yesterday which was being disavowed by more lies.

So it's not arrogance at all to say take another look at this. If you want no deal vote for it. Because that's certainly not what the prospectus was last time around.

If I buy what I think a colour telly and what comes is black and white, nobody would say I can't return it because it's still a fvkkin telly. They might have a case if it said it was black and white as advertised, but if it wasn't advertised...

I don't know for certain how many were duped by the Leave campaign, or indeed by Remain. Nobody does. Bur what is absolutely certain is that uncertainty. Only fair way to resolve it is to ask again, with all that's known now.

No Deal or Remain. That's the question that should have been asked and should be now. Pretty clear and decisive with no requirement for parliamentary shenanigans or EU negotiations required after the outcome.

Comparison with indyref 1 and soft hypotheses about voting intentions are weak reasons to avoid this in context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And if we are out then there 100% needs to be another indy ref in Scotland.

For the same reasons you described and because Scotland voted to stay in the UK as part of Europe. It's not known what the result would have been with a Brexit.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator