comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
One example:
‘I just don't rate him as high as Gerrard and Lampard and neither did his peers.’
You weren’t rebuffing anything at the time. You were just making a statement of fact that you have no place making.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, exactly. His peers didn't rate him as highly, evidenced by their votes. If they did, more of them would have voted for him and he'd have featured higher in the awards than Lampard and Gerrard. I'm not sure why you're struggling with that. It's pretty basic. If you want to argue they were more likely to receive votes, other than their respective abilities, fine but you can't argue that his peers didn't vote him as highly as Gerrard and Lampard as that's fact and it's documented. You can't rewrite history.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re actually delusional.
comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 2 minutes ago
"I don't claim to know what his peers thought only what they voted, which is surely linked to what they thought."
Mental gymnastics!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I haven't asked them why more of them voted for Gerrard and Lampard, I only know that they did.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 2 minutes ago
"I don't claim to know what his peers thought only what they voted, which is surely linked to what they thought."
Mental gymnastics!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I haven't asked them why more of them voted for Gerrard and Lampard, I only know that they did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In individual seasons.
The winsty and toor show.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 2 minutes ago
"I don't claim to know what his peers thought only what they voted, which is surely linked to what they thought."
Mental gymnastics!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I haven't asked them why more of them voted for Gerrard and Lampard, I only know that they did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In individual seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That make up their careers. So you're saying Scholes was better but inconsistent? I'd say Scholes was very consistent but never consistently better than Gerrard or Lampard and their peers agree.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Anyhow it's time to leave this. I've made my points.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 2 minutes ago
"I don't claim to know what his peers thought only what they voted, which is surely linked to what they thought."
Mental gymnastics!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I haven't asked them why more of them voted for Gerrard and Lampard, I only know that they did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In individual seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That make up their careers. So you're saying Scholes was better but inconsistent? I'd say Scholes was very consistent but never consistently better than Gerrard or Lampard and their peers agree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not about what I think.
It’s about you trying to pass something off as a fact that isn’t.
Out of the thousands of players that would be regarded as peers, how many voted for Gerrard? 100?
So even if you took those 100 and said they rated Gerrard higher (based on one seasons vote, so completely flawed), what about the rest?
What about the hundreds/thousands who never voted for either?
Your ‘fact’ is so far from being credible it belongs in the fiction aisle.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
Anyhow it's time to leave this. I've made my flawed points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 12 seconds ago
Anyhow it's time to leave this. I've made my points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“And it’s good night fron me...”
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
Anyhow it's time to leave this. I've made my flawed points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Winnie.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
Anyhow it's time to leave this. I've made my flawed points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Winnie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s been a pleasure tearing apart your points.
Goodnight.
comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 52 seconds ago
Anyhow it's time to leave this. I've made my points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't leave!
Have you done your homework from last week?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He hasn’t.
He will continue to decide what ‘holding’ means in the laws of the game. He does not need to actually read the laws of the game.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
My favourite ever player. I have to be consistent in my assessment, it is all well and good sitting inside those fancy studios talking nonsense. He is going to go down the Neville route now, scared to say anything
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
Paul Scholes
Page 7 of 7
6 | 7
posted on 14/3/19
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
One example:
‘I just don't rate him as high as Gerrard and Lampard and neither did his peers.’
You weren’t rebuffing anything at the time. You were just making a statement of fact that you have no place making.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, exactly. His peers didn't rate him as highly, evidenced by their votes. If they did, more of them would have voted for him and he'd have featured higher in the awards than Lampard and Gerrard. I'm not sure why you're struggling with that. It's pretty basic. If you want to argue they were more likely to receive votes, other than their respective abilities, fine but you can't argue that his peers didn't vote him as highly as Gerrard and Lampard as that's fact and it's documented. You can't rewrite history.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re actually delusional.
posted on 14/3/19
comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 2 minutes ago
"I don't claim to know what his peers thought only what they voted, which is surely linked to what they thought."
Mental gymnastics!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I haven't asked them why more of them voted for Gerrard and Lampard, I only know that they did.
posted on 14/3/19
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 2 minutes ago
"I don't claim to know what his peers thought only what they voted, which is surely linked to what they thought."
Mental gymnastics!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I haven't asked them why more of them voted for Gerrard and Lampard, I only know that they did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In individual seasons.
posted on 14/3/19
The winsty and toor show.
posted on 14/3/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 2 minutes ago
"I don't claim to know what his peers thought only what they voted, which is surely linked to what they thought."
Mental gymnastics!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I haven't asked them why more of them voted for Gerrard and Lampard, I only know that they did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In individual seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That make up their careers. So you're saying Scholes was better but inconsistent? I'd say Scholes was very consistent but never consistently better than Gerrard or Lampard and their peers agree.
posted on 14/3/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/3/19
Anyhow it's time to leave this. I've made my points.
posted on 14/3/19
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 2 minutes ago
"I don't claim to know what his peers thought only what they voted, which is surely linked to what they thought."
Mental gymnastics!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I haven't asked them why more of them voted for Gerrard and Lampard, I only know that they did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In individual seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That make up their careers. So you're saying Scholes was better but inconsistent? I'd say Scholes was very consistent but never consistently better than Gerrard or Lampard and their peers agree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not about what I think.
It’s about you trying to pass something off as a fact that isn’t.
Out of the thousands of players that would be regarded as peers, how many voted for Gerrard? 100?
So even if you took those 100 and said they rated Gerrard higher (based on one seasons vote, so completely flawed), what about the rest?
What about the hundreds/thousands who never voted for either?
Your ‘fact’ is so far from being credible it belongs in the fiction aisle.
posted on 14/3/19
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
Anyhow it's time to leave this. I've made my flawed points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed.
posted on 14/3/19
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 12 seconds ago
Anyhow it's time to leave this. I've made my points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“And it’s good night fron me...”
posted on 14/3/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
Anyhow it's time to leave this. I've made my flawed points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Winnie.
posted on 14/3/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/3/19
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
Anyhow it's time to leave this. I've made my flawed points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Winnie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s been a pleasure tearing apart your points.
Goodnight.
posted on 14/3/19
comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 52 seconds ago
Anyhow it's time to leave this. I've made my points.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't leave!
Have you done your homework from last week?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He hasn’t.
He will continue to decide what ‘holding’ means in the laws of the game. He does not need to actually read the laws of the game.
posted on 14/3/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/3/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/3/19
My favourite ever player. I have to be consistent in my assessment, it is all well and good sitting inside those fancy studios talking nonsense. He is going to go down the Neville route now, scared to say anything
posted on 14/3/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 7 of 7
6 | 7