It's a shambles and doesn't work. It has been proven
Lindelof was a straight red. How on earth can you make a decision to rescind it after watching it in super slow motion so that it doesn't look so bad. It was an awful tackle.
Along with Harry Claims offside goal being allowed to stand it has shown VAR to be farcical
When Man City played Schalke in the CL the other night, it took so long to review one of the goals. This suggests that the VAR panels or whatever you call em dont now what the fack they are doing
In the PL the ref won’t go and watch the incident for a 2nd time like in other countries. The VAR ref makes the call. That should speed the process way up
Rugby yesterday showing how it should work. The England try that was rightly not allowed. Its an accepted part of the game and works. They need something like Hawk-Eye in tennis and cricket to track the ball to see if it goes out or not and a video ref like rugby for everything else. Stop the clock like rugby for VAR reviews.
Lindelof was a yellow. Good decision. Think it would be better if the ref asks VAR before showing the card though.
It will be difficult to have VAR in every FA Cup game, especially in the early rounds. But come the quarters every game is televised so at this stage it should be. At the moment it is in a trial period, though, so normal for it not to be at every game.
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 45 minutes ago
It's a shambles and doesn't work. It has been proven
Lindelof was a straight red. How on earth can you make a decision to rescind it after watching it in super slow motion so that it doesn't look so bad. It was an awful tackle.
Along with Harry Claims offside goal being allowed to stand it has shown VAR to be farcical
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Straight red
comment by San Miguel (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 45 minutes ago
It's a shambles and doesn't work. It has been proven
Lindelof was a straight red. How on earth can you make a decision to rescind it after watching it in super slow motion so that it doesn't look so bad. It was an awful tackle.
Along with Harry Claims offside goal being allowed to stand it has shown VAR to be farcical
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Straight red
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was more of a bisexual red. Could go either way
No, it only looked like a yellow when it was slowed right down. A decision should be made in normal speed and it was a red
VAR would given that goal for Brighton
comment by 4everanarsenalfan (U20629)
posted 4 hours, 39 minutes ago
VAR would given that goal for Brighton
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brighton could easily have had a penalty in the first half, Millwal's first goal disallowed for the foul and their goal would have stood.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
VAR
Page 1 of 1
posted on 17/3/19
It's a shambles and doesn't work. It has been proven
Lindelof was a straight red. How on earth can you make a decision to rescind it after watching it in super slow motion so that it doesn't look so bad. It was an awful tackle.
Along with Harry Claims offside goal being allowed to stand it has shown VAR to be farcical
posted on 17/3/19
When Man City played Schalke in the CL the other night, it took so long to review one of the goals. This suggests that the VAR panels or whatever you call em dont now what the fack they are doing
posted on 17/3/19
In the PL the ref won’t go and watch the incident for a 2nd time like in other countries. The VAR ref makes the call. That should speed the process way up
posted on 17/3/19
Rugby yesterday showing how it should work. The England try that was rightly not allowed. Its an accepted part of the game and works. They need something like Hawk-Eye in tennis and cricket to track the ball to see if it goes out or not and a video ref like rugby for everything else. Stop the clock like rugby for VAR reviews.
posted on 17/3/19
Lindelof was a yellow. Good decision. Think it would be better if the ref asks VAR before showing the card though.
It will be difficult to have VAR in every FA Cup game, especially in the early rounds. But come the quarters every game is televised so at this stage it should be. At the moment it is in a trial period, though, so normal for it not to be at every game.
posted on 17/3/19
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 45 minutes ago
It's a shambles and doesn't work. It has been proven
Lindelof was a straight red. How on earth can you make a decision to rescind it after watching it in super slow motion so that it doesn't look so bad. It was an awful tackle.
Along with Harry Claims offside goal being allowed to stand it has shown VAR to be farcical
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Straight red
posted on 17/3/19
comment by San Miguel (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 45 minutes ago
It's a shambles and doesn't work. It has been proven
Lindelof was a straight red. How on earth can you make a decision to rescind it after watching it in super slow motion so that it doesn't look so bad. It was an awful tackle.
Along with Harry Claims offside goal being allowed to stand it has shown VAR to be farcical
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Straight red
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was more of a bisexual red. Could go either way
posted on 17/3/19
No, it only looked like a yellow when it was slowed right down. A decision should be made in normal speed and it was a red
posted on 17/3/19
VAR would given that goal for Brighton
posted on 17/3/19
comment by 4everanarsenalfan (U20629)
posted 4 hours, 39 minutes ago
VAR would given that goal for Brighton
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brighton could easily have had a penalty in the first half, Millwal's first goal disallowed for the foul and their goal would have stood.
Page 1 of 1