comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 seconds ago
"I never said Hamish didn't bring it up first though did i? "
"Read back, i said it about Morelos before any of you."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah sneakily removing the context i just provided.
Unless Hamish is a Tim you're a dafty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're struggling with this one greatly.
I suggest you admit you were in the wrong and we can all move on to prevent further embarrassment for yourself.
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 seconds ago
"I never said Hamish didn't bring it up first though did i? "
"Read back, i said it about Morelos before any of you."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah sneakily removing the context i just provided.
Unless Hamish is a Tim you're a dafty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're struggling with this one greatly.
I suggest you admit you were in the wrong and we can all move on to prevent further embarrassment for yourself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oooft the red neck on you.
Wisely gave up on the point you thought you had though.
The point is clear as day for anyone to see, you made a kant of it, i'm not going to keep pointing it out for you
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 seconds ago
"I never said Hamish didn't bring it up first though did i? "
"Read back, i said it about Morelos before any of you."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah sneakily removing the context i just provided.
Unless Hamish is a Tim you're a dafty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're struggling with this one greatly.
I suggest you admit you were in the wrong and we can all move on to prevent further embarrassment for yourself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oooft the red neck on you.
Wisely gave up on the point you thought you had though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s quite simple really.
Were you the first on here to mention concerns about Morelos or not?
Context is simple.
If Hamish is a Tim NNH is right, if he's not i'm right.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 seconds ago
"I never said Hamish didn't bring it up first though did i? "
"Read back, i said it about Morelos before any of you."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah sneakily removing the context i just provided.
Unless Hamish is a Tim you're a dafty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're struggling with this one greatly.
I suggest you admit you were in the wrong and we can all move on to prevent further embarrassment for yourself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oooft the red neck on you.
Wisely gave up on the point you thought you had though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s quite simple really.
Were you the first on here to mention concerns about Morelos or not?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In his mind he was, then he wasn't, then he was again.
This whole thing is about as refreshing as another Tim comment on Morelos.
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 15 seconds ago
Context is simple.
If Hamish is a Tim NNH is right, if he's not i'm right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Hamish was a Tim then you'd be right you absolute
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 15 seconds ago
Context is simple.
If Hamish is a Tim NNH is right, if he's not i'm right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Hamish was a Tim then you'd be right you absolute
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he's not.
Thanks, as i expected you were wrong.
I worry for people like you in the real world, i really do
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 15 seconds ago
Context is simple.
If Hamish is a Tim NNH is right, if he's not i'm right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Hamish was a Tim then you'd be right you absolute
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hamishes misses is a Tim - does that help?
But Hamish is deffo not left footed
I think my very simple closed question being answered would resolve this to be honest.
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 15 seconds ago
Context is simple.
If Hamish is a Tim NNH is right, if he's not i'm right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Hamish was a Tim then you'd be right you absolute
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hamishes misses is a Tim - does that help?
But Hamish is deffo not left footed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 1 minute ago
I worry for people like you in the real world, i really do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Be better worrying about your understanding of context
I think it's quite clear you're struggling here, not me.
I'm sure the inevitable "Ah got ye there, mad wum that a am" will follow in due course.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think my very simple closed question being answered would resolve this to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well no it wouldn't because like NNH you are also choosing to ignore the context.
If you would frame the question fitting the context it would be did you mention it before any of the Tims?
Answer being of course, yes.
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 1 minute ago
I think it's quite clear you're struggling here, not me.
I'm sure the inevitable "Ah got ye there, mad wum that a am" will follow in due course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it must be the schools.
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think my very simple closed question being answered would resolve this to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well no it wouldn't because like NNH you are also choosing to ignore the context.
If you would frame the question fitting the context it would be did you mention it before any of the Tims?
Answer being of course, yes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you’re wrong.
Hamish being a bear mentioned it before you did.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think my very simple closed question being answered would resolve this to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well no it wouldn't because like NNH you are also choosing to ignore the context.
If you would frame the question fitting the context it would be did you mention it before any of the Tims?
Answer being of course, yes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you’re wrong.
Hamish being a bear mentioned it before you did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You got the second half right.
He mentioned it before i did but i wasn't disputing that, i mentioned it before the Tims which is what i said if you don't ignore the context.
should change ur name to curly wurly HB
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
Potential Targets
Page 5 of 5
posted on 17/4/19
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 seconds ago
"I never said Hamish didn't bring it up first though did i? "
"Read back, i said it about Morelos before any of you."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah sneakily removing the context i just provided.
Unless Hamish is a Tim you're a dafty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're struggling with this one greatly.
I suggest you admit you were in the wrong and we can all move on to prevent further embarrassment for yourself.
posted on 17/4/19
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 seconds ago
"I never said Hamish didn't bring it up first though did i? "
"Read back, i said it about Morelos before any of you."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah sneakily removing the context i just provided.
Unless Hamish is a Tim you're a dafty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're struggling with this one greatly.
I suggest you admit you were in the wrong and we can all move on to prevent further embarrassment for yourself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oooft the red neck on you.
Wisely gave up on the point you thought you had though.
posted on 17/4/19
The point is clear as day for anyone to see, you made a kant of it, i'm not going to keep pointing it out for you
posted on 17/4/19
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 seconds ago
"I never said Hamish didn't bring it up first though did i? "
"Read back, i said it about Morelos before any of you."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah sneakily removing the context i just provided.
Unless Hamish is a Tim you're a dafty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're struggling with this one greatly.
I suggest you admit you were in the wrong and we can all move on to prevent further embarrassment for yourself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oooft the red neck on you.
Wisely gave up on the point you thought you had though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s quite simple really.
Were you the first on here to mention concerns about Morelos or not?
posted on 17/4/19
Context is simple.
If Hamish is a Tim NNH is right, if he's not i'm right.
posted on 17/4/19
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 seconds ago
"I never said Hamish didn't bring it up first though did i? "
"Read back, i said it about Morelos before any of you."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah sneakily removing the context i just provided.
Unless Hamish is a Tim you're a dafty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're struggling with this one greatly.
I suggest you admit you were in the wrong and we can all move on to prevent further embarrassment for yourself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oooft the red neck on you.
Wisely gave up on the point you thought you had though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s quite simple really.
Were you the first on here to mention concerns about Morelos or not?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In his mind he was, then he wasn't, then he was again.
posted on 17/4/19
This whole thing is about as refreshing as another Tim comment on Morelos.
posted on 17/4/19
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 15 seconds ago
Context is simple.
If Hamish is a Tim NNH is right, if he's not i'm right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Hamish was a Tim then you'd be right you absolute
posted on 17/4/19
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 15 seconds ago
Context is simple.
If Hamish is a Tim NNH is right, if he's not i'm right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Hamish was a Tim then you'd be right you absolute
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he's not.
Thanks, as i expected you were wrong.
posted on 17/4/19
I worry for people like you in the real world, i really do
posted on 17/4/19
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 15 seconds ago
Context is simple.
If Hamish is a Tim NNH is right, if he's not i'm right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Hamish was a Tim then you'd be right you absolute
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hamishes misses is a Tim - does that help?
But Hamish is deffo not left footed
posted on 17/4/19
I think my very simple closed question being answered would resolve this to be honest.
posted on 17/4/19
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 15 seconds ago
Context is simple.
If Hamish is a Tim NNH is right, if he's not i'm right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Hamish was a Tim then you'd be right you absolute
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hamishes misses is a Tim - does that help?
But Hamish is deffo not left footed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 17/4/19
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 1 minute ago
I worry for people like you in the real world, i really do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Be better worrying about your understanding of context
posted on 17/4/19
So no answer then?
posted on 17/4/19
I think it's quite clear you're struggling here, not me.
I'm sure the inevitable "Ah got ye there, mad wum that a am" will follow in due course.
posted on 17/4/19
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think my very simple closed question being answered would resolve this to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well no it wouldn't because like NNH you are also choosing to ignore the context.
If you would frame the question fitting the context it would be did you mention it before any of the Tims?
Answer being of course, yes.
posted on 17/4/19
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 1 minute ago
I think it's quite clear you're struggling here, not me.
I'm sure the inevitable "Ah got ye there, mad wum that a am" will follow in due course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it must be the schools.
posted on 17/4/19
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think my very simple closed question being answered would resolve this to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well no it wouldn't because like NNH you are also choosing to ignore the context.
If you would frame the question fitting the context it would be did you mention it before any of the Tims?
Answer being of course, yes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you’re wrong.
Hamish being a bear mentioned it before you did.
posted on 17/4/19
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think my very simple closed question being answered would resolve this to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well no it wouldn't because like NNH you are also choosing to ignore the context.
If you would frame the question fitting the context it would be did you mention it before any of the Tims?
Answer being of course, yes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you’re wrong.
Hamish being a bear mentioned it before you did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You got the second half right.
He mentioned it before i did but i wasn't disputing that, i mentioned it before the Tims which is what i said if you don't ignore the context.
posted on 17/4/19
should change ur name to curly wurly HB
posted on 18/4/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 5 of 5