If ever there was an article you've written that's guaranteed, heaven-sent to bite you in thearse GB then this is it.
I didn't like the manner of his leaving either, but he's gone, good luck to the boy, he's playing well, but, more importantly, he's nothing to do with us.
Jtr....its less to do with sterling but more to do with how we are now in comparison to a few yrs ago, I just used sterling as an example....not sure why u have written that reply!
but Anfield for sure is a much happier place than the Etihad
---------------------------
I am sure Sterling has a different view, the way your vile fans treated him when he wanted to leave
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
Jtr....its less to do with sterling but more to do with how we are now in comparison to a few yrs ago, I just used sterling as an example....not sure why u have written that reply!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's definitely not how I read your post, GB.
All I know is that I am glad we have him. In retrospect, the money City paid for him was money well spent and frankly, an absolute bargain.
Started slow under Pellegrini but Guardiola's impact was noticeable from the offset in terms of his attitude and performance.
He has been immense this season and last. Long may it continue.
Some interesting times ahead for both clubs.
In my opinion, should Liverpool overcome Barcelona in the Semis they will go on to triumph in the Final.
Yeh I am sure Sterling would give up all his medals to play for a club that has won nothing for close on a decade.
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeh I am sure Sterling would give up all his medals to play for a club that has won nothing for close on a decade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should he play for Spurs instead?
Interesting,,,how many CL and Prem titles has Sterling won at City?
But he would have been poorer staying at Liverpool. He joined City in July 2015 for £180,000 a week after rejecting a £100,000 a week contract to stay at Liverpool. Assuming he would have been on £100K at Liverpool then he would have been about £16 million worse off by staying at Liverpool (£80k x 200 weeks). So not so daft.
comment by Jordan's O-face (U22023)
posted 3 minutes ago
But he would have been poorer staying at Liverpool. He joined City in July 2015 for £180,000 a week after rejecting a £100,000 a week contract to stay at Liverpool. Assuming he would have been on £100K at Liverpool then he would have been about £16 million worse off by staying at Liverpool (£80k x 200 weeks). So not so daft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but even on £100,000 pw he would’ve still earned £20m.
It’s not as if he couldn’t afford the latest DFS sofa if he hadn’t of moved.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
How times have changed!
Page 1 of 1
posted on 19/4/19
If ever there was an article you've written that's guaranteed, heaven-sent to bite you in thearse GB then this is it.
I didn't like the manner of his leaving either, but he's gone, good luck to the boy, he's playing well, but, more importantly, he's nothing to do with us.
posted on 19/4/19
Jtr....its less to do with sterling but more to do with how we are now in comparison to a few yrs ago, I just used sterling as an example....not sure why u have written that reply!
posted on 19/4/19
but Anfield for sure is a much happier place than the Etihad
---------------------------
I am sure Sterling has a different view, the way your vile fans treated him when he wanted to leave
posted on 19/4/19
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
Jtr....its less to do with sterling but more to do with how we are now in comparison to a few yrs ago, I just used sterling as an example....not sure why u have written that reply!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's definitely not how I read your post, GB.
posted on 19/4/19
All I know is that I am glad we have him. In retrospect, the money City paid for him was money well spent and frankly, an absolute bargain.
Started slow under Pellegrini but Guardiola's impact was noticeable from the offset in terms of his attitude and performance.
He has been immense this season and last. Long may it continue.
Some interesting times ahead for both clubs.
In my opinion, should Liverpool overcome Barcelona in the Semis they will go on to triumph in the Final.
posted on 19/4/19
Yeh I am sure Sterling would give up all his medals to play for a club that has won nothing for close on a decade.
posted on 19/4/19
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeh I am sure Sterling would give up all his medals to play for a club that has won nothing for close on a decade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should he play for Spurs instead?
posted on 19/4/19
Interesting,,,how many CL and Prem titles has Sterling won at City?
posted on 20/4/19
But he would have been poorer staying at Liverpool. He joined City in July 2015 for £180,000 a week after rejecting a £100,000 a week contract to stay at Liverpool. Assuming he would have been on £100K at Liverpool then he would have been about £16 million worse off by staying at Liverpool (£80k x 200 weeks). So not so daft.
posted on 20/4/19
comment by Jordan's O-face (U22023)
posted 3 minutes ago
But he would have been poorer staying at Liverpool. He joined City in July 2015 for £180,000 a week after rejecting a £100,000 a week contract to stay at Liverpool. Assuming he would have been on £100K at Liverpool then he would have been about £16 million worse off by staying at Liverpool (£80k x 200 weeks). So not so daft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but even on £100,000 pw he would’ve still earned £20m.
It’s not as if he couldn’t afford the latest DFS sofa if he hadn’t of moved.
Page 1 of 1