So RC, at the time that Mancini story broke could you point to where Man City denied it around the same time frame?
You can probably only answer "no" as a direct reply, but for sure choose a more convoluted answer if you must.
I’ve already said - at the time City refused to comment on the allegations.
Since it was referred. city have come out and said that the allegations are false.
I have to ask. Are you suggesting that because City didn’t comment at the time, Because they didn’t deny it at the time, then it must be true?
If you think that, ok. Time will prove whether you’re right to think that. Or not.
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 45 minutes ago
I’ve already said - at the time City refused to comment on the allegations.
Since it was referred. city have come out and said that the allegations are false.
I have to ask. Are you suggesting that because City didn’t comment at the time, Because they didn’t deny it at the time, then it must be true?
If you think that, ok. Time will prove whether you’re right to think that. Or not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup I do.
If it was clearly wrong it would have been denied straight off the bat.
Sign in if you want to comment
Liverpool Being Investigated
Page 3 of 3
posted on 20/5/19
So RC, at the time that Mancini story broke could you point to where Man City denied it around the same time frame?
You can probably only answer "no" as a direct reply, but for sure choose a more convoluted answer if you must.
posted on 20/5/19
I’ve already said - at the time City refused to comment on the allegations.
Since it was referred. city have come out and said that the allegations are false.
I have to ask. Are you suggesting that because City didn’t comment at the time, Because they didn’t deny it at the time, then it must be true?
If you think that, ok. Time will prove whether you’re right to think that. Or not.
posted on 20/5/19
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 45 minutes ago
I’ve already said - at the time City refused to comment on the allegations.
Since it was referred. city have come out and said that the allegations are false.
I have to ask. Are you suggesting that because City didn’t comment at the time, Because they didn’t deny it at the time, then it must be true?
If you think that, ok. Time will prove whether you’re right to think that. Or not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup I do.
If it was clearly wrong it would have been denied straight off the bat.
Page 3 of 3