or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 48276 comments are related to an article called:

Tottenham Transfer News - LIVE

Page 224 of 1932

posted on 19/7/19

^ yes please

comment by Phenom (U20037)

posted on 19/7/19

absolute not brainer.

dele, son, lucas, ziyech, bruno, kane as forward options.

posted on 19/7/19

Must be the Argentine connection.

posted on 19/7/19

Firstly, Lo Celso can and will be competition for Winks (amongst others). Those two CM positions can be rotated between Lo Celso, Ndombele and Winks. Then you have Sissoko, Wanyama and Dier as more defensive options too.

Then, the £70m tag is all media talk and asking price. If they're buying Fekir for £22m or whatever it's costing them then no way are they getting full asking price.

Lastly, if Pochettino says he wants Lo Celso then we should give him who he wants. Bruno and Ziyech both play in weaker leagues than where Lo Celso has been. No guarantee with any of them.

comment by Spurtle (U1608)

posted on 19/7/19

Is Lo Celso an attacking mid? He has a pretty good goalscoring record for his last season which suggests he must get into quite advanced positions.

comment by Hengy (U9129)

posted on 19/7/19

The price for Lo Celso is crazy and that’s why he isn’t a Tottenham player right now.

I’m a fan of him tbh, see him a few times for PSG and liked him but at Betis pushing forward more he’s excelled imo

If he’s the player poch has picked then he’s who we should be after.

posted on 19/7/19

comment by Boss By Hugo (U18550)
posted 1 minute ago
Firstly, Lo Celso can and will be competition for Winks (amongst others). Those two CM positions can be rotated between Lo Celso, Ndombele and Winks. Then you have Sissoko, Wanyama and Dier as more defensive options too.

Then, the £70m tag is all media talk and asking price. If they're buying Fekir for £22m or whatever it's costing them then no way are they getting full asking price.

Lastly, if Pochettino says he wants Lo Celso then we should give him who he wants. Bruno and Ziyech both play in weaker leagues than where Lo Celso has been. No guarantee with any of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By competition for winks I meant a more defensive option - since wanyama and dier are both garbage. We need someone other than winks who can play as the deepest in a midfield 3 who is also good

Considering the sell on clause PSG have I wouldn't be shocked if betis are hoping for a price similar to what is being rumoured

I tend to agree that if lo celso is who poch wants then we should get him

posted on 19/7/19

comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 53 seconds ago
Is Lo Celso an attacking mid? He has a pretty good goalscoring record for his last season which suggests he must get into quite advanced positions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He played as a 10, an 8 and as a second striker for them last season

posted on 19/7/19

Think we will Lo Celso for a similar price to Ndombele

posted on 19/7/19

Ndombele was a bit of a bargain price really.

posted on 19/7/19

comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 9 seconds ago
Ndombele was a bit of a bargain price really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

How so?

comment by Phenom (U20037)

posted on 19/7/19

was talk of 90mill at one stage for him

posted on 19/7/19

As a comparison of prices being touted for lesser players.

posted on 19/7/19

comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 1 minute ago
As a comparison of prices being touted for lesser players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It's only the Spanish clubs and PSG with ridiculous 9-figure transfers. Most of the other top players have gone for £50m-£70m and with Ndombele we are pretty much in the middle of that.

posted on 19/7/19

I wouldn't have been unhappy if we'd paid the £70m being quoted for Lo Celso. £15m cheaper is a decent deal.

posted on 19/7/19

comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 19 seconds ago
I wouldn't have been unhappy if we'd paid the £70m being quoted for Lo Celso. £15m cheaper is a decent deal.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ndombele?

posted on 19/7/19

Yeah. In relation to the price paid for Ndombele..I wouldn't have been unhappy if we'd paid the £70m being quoted for Lo Celso. £15m cheaper is a decent deal.

posted on 19/7/19

Ah

posted on 19/7/19

"Bargain" price was strong. But a good deal.

posted on 19/7/19

In theory, Lo Celso would fit much better in a midfield 3 than Ziyech or Fernandes. I think if Eriksen were to stay, then he and Lo Celso could play in the same XI, whereas I think Eriksen, Ziyech and Fernandes would all be either/or, or alternatively one would have to play out of position.

posted on 19/7/19

Also, if Eriksen and Alderweireld both stay for the coming season at least, that has to go down as a huge victory for Spurs. Alderweireld can then leave for free next summer, when he's 31 and presumably will move onto somewhere like Italy or back to Ajax.

That would leave RB and CF as priority positions for improvements/backup, which would be fine. It'd be OK to finish this summer with two positions still slightly in need of reinforcing, whereas if Eriksen and Alderweireld left, that would mean FOUR positions in need of reinforcements.

posted on 19/7/19

Not entirely sure that post made much sense but hopefully you know what I mean

posted on 19/7/19

31 is not old. Keep him for longer if he continues playing well and has the desire to

comment by Phenom (U20037)

posted on 19/7/19

My theory with Bruno and Ziyech is that if we play 4231

(2) we have Ndombele, Winks, Sissoko, Wanyama
(3) we have Dele, Son, Lucas, Lamela, Bruno, Ziyech

whereas just signing Lo celso for a big sum is a gamble for just one player possibly trying to cover 2 squad positions, CM and AM.

comment by Phenom (U20037)

posted on 19/7/19

Lo celso doesn't take set pieces and have that many assists to his name to make up for the around 10-15 a season we get from eriksen

Page 224 of 1932

Sign in if you want to comment