comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 12 minutes ago
I think had Kane not played we would still have lost. Only people would be going nuts at Poch for not starting Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’d have done better without him. He was your worst player in the final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason for that isn't just that he wasn't 100% fit, it's that he is very very predictable as to where and how he will play.
That is meat and drink to Matip, never mind to VVD. More fluidity would have caused us mkre problems.
Yeah out of all Spurs players Son is top of the list.
Klopp after 2 Spurs players?
by morespurs (U15748)
16 June 2019
Comment on this Article
I am not 100% sure about the source but the report says Klopp is gearing up to make two bids for two Spurs players in the summer window. Players are:
Lucas Moura and Son Heung-min
This is surely some sensational journalism?
Link: https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1141161/Liverpool-Jurgen-Klopp-Tottenham-Son-Heung-min-Lucas-Moura-John-Aldridge-transfer-news
I am sure someone will come here and make a comment like Express
Whatever, are we seeing a new low for journalists because the transfer window has been so lame so far, they are making things up now?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all garbage mate, chill!
I can`t see Son and Lucas wanting to join that awful football club
All I will say is that there are very few leaks from LFC these days.
See for example the Fabinho signing.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Starting Kane was 100% the right decision. He’s Tottenhams talisman and him playing lifts the whole team. The mistake was playing Alli instead of Moura
comment by Liverpoolwhoelse17 (U16825)
posted 56 minutes ago
Yeah Kane is a great goal scorer. But I don't think hes technically that great and he ruins attacks. Spurs play better with Son.Hes more of a fluent attacker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get slated by my own fellow fans for saying similar to this. You can see this, why can't they?
comment by Liverpoolwhoelse17 (U16825)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
The only player I would take from Tottenham would be Son. The rest of em are rubbish. Even Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why oh why do people today brush off Moura's incredible hat trick against Ajax? Back in the day it took one goal to realize a player had immense talent/skill. Maradona in the 86 World Cup against England (after 'the hand of god' goal) and Klinsman also against England in a later World Cup I think it was. Nevertheless, these events put players like these on the map, so to speak, so why with Moura's insane single-handed CL Final qualifying performance is he now, weeks later, "meh". Or even in your words, rubbish?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Wahl (U22164)
posted 6 minutes ago
Starting Kane was 100% the right decision. He’s Tottenhams talisman and him playing lifts the whole team. The mistake was playing Alli instead of Moura
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’d say more playing Son instead of Moura. Dele player really well in the SF linking up with Moura, whereas Son had been on a run of poor performances since his goals at City in the QF.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well said.
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 12 minutes ago
I think had Kane not played we would still have lost. Only people would be going nuts at Poch for not starting Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’d have done better without him. He was your worst player in the final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he wasnt not even close in fact
comment by Pranks- European Champions (U6283)
posted 18 minutes ago
express
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. Thank goodness. Only have to look at their weather predictions to real eyes it's all outright mockingly lies from that rag.
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 12 minutes ago
I think had Kane not played we would still have lost. Only people would be going nuts at Poch for not starting Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’d have done better without him. He was your worst player in the final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he wasntnot even close in fact
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was close to it, clearly not fit!
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 12 minutes ago
I think had Kane not played we would still have lost. Only people would be going nuts at Poch for not starting Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’d have done better without him. He was your worst player in the final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he wasntnot even close in fact
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm. He has a point. Yes close. Our own fans seem to have rose tinted specs (no pun intended). Yet other fans see our weaknesses and all the costly fatal mistakes Mau (Poch) makes with his selections.
comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 12 minutes ago
I think had Kane not played we would still have lost. Only people would be going nuts at Poch for not starting Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’d have done better without him. He was your worst player in the final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he wasntnot even close in fact
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was close to it, clearly not fit!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont think he looked any less fit than the rest of the squad, we hadn't played in 3 weeks and it showed.
Was hardly like everyone looked super sharp and then Kane was plodding along trying to keep up
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 12 minutes ago
I think had Kane not played we would still have lost. Only people would be going nuts at Poch for not starting Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’d have done better without him. He was your worst player in the final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he wasntnot even close in fact
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was close to it, clearly not fit!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup. And not only not fit. Not on form. Ace called it when Moura who was blatantly not only on form, but on fire, was needed from the off.
"Kane's big and clunky and speaks funny so hes probably technically limited and just a Kevin Davies type" seems to be the logic here
Hes an excellent technical player ffs
Dont know where this whole "kane ruins our attacks and son doesnt" mentality comes from either
Theres a reason we've been calling son clownshoes since he first arrived
Brilliant player but boy can he mess up our counter attacks, did It loads in the final
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Eighties Glory Years (U22086)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Liverpoolwhoelse17 (U16825)
posted 56 minutes ago
Yeah Kane is a great goal scorer. But I don't think hes technically that great and he ruins attacks. Spurs play better with Son.Hes more of a fluent attacker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get slated by my own fellow fans for saying similar to this. You can see this, why can't they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not technically that great? Have you actually got any insight to back that up or is it just sheite that you’re reeling off?
For a start he’s a lethal finisher, as backed up by us stats. That’s not even up for debate. He also has excellent hold up play when he comes deep, either forcing fouls or pulling others into play with his lay offs. He’s also one of the best passers of the ball in the Spurs squad; look at some of the assists and goals he’s created with his long range passing. He’s also an excellent long range shooter, again backed up by his goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK well read my next comment. Kane clearly when on form is a must-have play-maker. But what I have seen since the opening of the new stadium he has clearly been out of sorts. Call it karma, but he looked like he felt entitled to score the first goal in the new stadium, and that piece of history writing went to Son. Then, maybe out of immaturity (you can see him with his puffy hoodie and iPhone when sitting down when he was out injured) he goes and gets himself injured by some stupid tackle. This is not the behavior of a disciplined self-controlled player. I like Kane, or at least I liked him. With all this ellusive half-time team talk against Ajax (which the players said happened yet the manager said didnt) something is clearly not running smoothly here.
I just hope next season we don't go backwards. Our club needs to solidify, not have cliquey rifts between themselves.
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Wahl (U22164)
posted 6 minutes ago
Starting Kane was 100% the right decision. He’s Tottenhams talisman and him playing lifts the whole team. The mistake was playing Alli instead of Moura
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’d say more playing Son instead of Moura. Dele player really well in the SF linking up with Moura, whereas Son had been on a run of poor performances since his goals at City in the QF.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ace, come on mate. Ajax away was Dele’s first good game since about January. Son was unlucky not to make team of the season. I can’t believe more Spurs fans weren’t calling for him to be dropped for the final, instead it was Son or Moura.
comment by Eighties Glory Years (U22086)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Pranks- European Champions (U6283)
posted 18 minutes ago
express
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. Thank goodness. Only have to look at their weather predictions to real eyes it's all outright mockingly lies from that rag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
they do type some complete and utter shiiiit.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Tl;dr
Kane feels entitled to get opening goal at new stadium.
Doesn't get it.
Gets himself injured (a la Gazza style) with a self-inflicted injury from a tackle.
Clearly not fit (or on form) he is played in the CL Final instead of on fire hat trick qualifying Moura from the Semi's.
We lose.
Blame it both on manager and Kane himself. All goes back to the opening of the new stadium.
Sign in if you want to comment
Klopp after 2 Spurs players?
Page 2 of 3
posted on 16/6/19
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 12 minutes ago
I think had Kane not played we would still have lost. Only people would be going nuts at Poch for not starting Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’d have done better without him. He was your worst player in the final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason for that isn't just that he wasn't 100% fit, it's that he is very very predictable as to where and how he will play.
That is meat and drink to Matip, never mind to VVD. More fluidity would have caused us mkre problems.
Yeah out of all Spurs players Son is top of the list.
posted on 16/6/19
Klopp after 2 Spurs players?
by morespurs (U15748)
16 June 2019
Comment on this Article
I am not 100% sure about the source but the report says Klopp is gearing up to make two bids for two Spurs players in the summer window. Players are:
Lucas Moura and Son Heung-min
This is surely some sensational journalism?
Link: https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1141161/Liverpool-Jurgen-Klopp-Tottenham-Son-Heung-min-Lucas-Moura-John-Aldridge-transfer-news
I am sure someone will come here and make a comment like Express
Whatever, are we seeing a new low for journalists because the transfer window has been so lame so far, they are making things up now?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all garbage mate, chill!
posted on 16/6/19
I can`t see Son and Lucas wanting to join that awful football club
posted on 16/6/19
express
posted on 16/6/19
All I will say is that there are very few leaks from LFC these days.
See for example the Fabinho signing.
posted on 16/6/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 16/6/19
Starting Kane was 100% the right decision. He’s Tottenhams talisman and him playing lifts the whole team. The mistake was playing Alli instead of Moura
posted on 16/6/19
comment by Liverpoolwhoelse17 (U16825)
posted 56 minutes ago
Yeah Kane is a great goal scorer. But I don't think hes technically that great and he ruins attacks. Spurs play better with Son.Hes more of a fluent attacker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get slated by my own fellow fans for saying similar to this. You can see this, why can't they?
posted on 16/6/19
comment by Liverpoolwhoelse17 (U16825)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
The only player I would take from Tottenham would be Son. The rest of em are rubbish. Even Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why oh why do people today brush off Moura's incredible hat trick against Ajax? Back in the day it took one goal to realize a player had immense talent/skill. Maradona in the 86 World Cup against England (after 'the hand of god' goal) and Klinsman also against England in a later World Cup I think it was. Nevertheless, these events put players like these on the map, so to speak, so why with Moura's insane single-handed CL Final qualifying performance is he now, weeks later, "meh". Or even in your words, rubbish?
posted on 16/6/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 16/6/19
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Wahl (U22164)
posted 6 minutes ago
Starting Kane was 100% the right decision. He’s Tottenhams talisman and him playing lifts the whole team. The mistake was playing Alli instead of Moura
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’d say more playing Son instead of Moura. Dele player really well in the SF linking up with Moura, whereas Son had been on a run of poor performances since his goals at City in the QF.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well said.
posted on 16/6/19
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 12 minutes ago
I think had Kane not played we would still have lost. Only people would be going nuts at Poch for not starting Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’d have done better without him. He was your worst player in the final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he wasnt not even close in fact
posted on 16/6/19
comment by Pranks- European Champions (U6283)
posted 18 minutes ago
express
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. Thank goodness. Only have to look at their weather predictions to real eyes it's all outright mockingly lies from that rag.
posted on 16/6/19
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 12 minutes ago
I think had Kane not played we would still have lost. Only people would be going nuts at Poch for not starting Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’d have done better without him. He was your worst player in the final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he wasntnot even close in fact
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was close to it, clearly not fit!
posted on 16/6/19
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 12 minutes ago
I think had Kane not played we would still have lost. Only people would be going nuts at Poch for not starting Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’d have done better without him. He was your worst player in the final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he wasntnot even close in fact
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm. He has a point. Yes close. Our own fans seem to have rose tinted specs (no pun intended). Yet other fans see our weaknesses and all the costly fatal mistakes Mau (Poch) makes with his selections.
posted on 16/6/19
comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 12 minutes ago
I think had Kane not played we would still have lost. Only people would be going nuts at Poch for not starting Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’d have done better without him. He was your worst player in the final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he wasntnot even close in fact
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was close to it, clearly not fit!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont think he looked any less fit than the rest of the squad, we hadn't played in 3 weeks and it showed.
Was hardly like everyone looked super sharp and then Kane was plodding along trying to keep up
posted on 16/6/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 16/6/19
comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 12 minutes ago
I think had Kane not played we would still have lost. Only people would be going nuts at Poch for not starting Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’d have done better without him. He was your worst player in the final.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he wasntnot even close in fact
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was close to it, clearly not fit!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup. And not only not fit. Not on form. Ace called it when Moura who was blatantly not only on form, but on fire, was needed from the off.
posted on 16/6/19
"Kane's big and clunky and speaks funny so hes probably technically limited and just a Kevin Davies type" seems to be the logic here
Hes an excellent technical player ffs
posted on 16/6/19
Dont know where this whole "kane ruins our attacks and son doesnt" mentality comes from either
Theres a reason we've been calling son clownshoes since he first arrived
Brilliant player but boy can he mess up our counter attacks, did It loads in the final
posted on 16/6/19
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Eighties Glory Years (U22086)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Liverpoolwhoelse17 (U16825)
posted 56 minutes ago
Yeah Kane is a great goal scorer. But I don't think hes technically that great and he ruins attacks. Spurs play better with Son.Hes more of a fluent attacker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get slated by my own fellow fans for saying similar to this. You can see this, why can't they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not technically that great? Have you actually got any insight to back that up or is it just sheite that you’re reeling off?
For a start he’s a lethal finisher, as backed up by us stats. That’s not even up for debate. He also has excellent hold up play when he comes deep, either forcing fouls or pulling others into play with his lay offs. He’s also one of the best passers of the ball in the Spurs squad; look at some of the assists and goals he’s created with his long range passing. He’s also an excellent long range shooter, again backed up by his goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK well read my next comment. Kane clearly when on form is a must-have play-maker. But what I have seen since the opening of the new stadium he has clearly been out of sorts. Call it karma, but he looked like he felt entitled to score the first goal in the new stadium, and that piece of history writing went to Son. Then, maybe out of immaturity (you can see him with his puffy hoodie and iPhone when sitting down when he was out injured) he goes and gets himself injured by some stupid tackle. This is not the behavior of a disciplined self-controlled player. I like Kane, or at least I liked him. With all this ellusive half-time team talk against Ajax (which the players said happened yet the manager said didnt) something is clearly not running smoothly here.
I just hope next season we don't go backwards. Our club needs to solidify, not have cliquey rifts between themselves.
posted on 16/6/19
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Wahl (U22164)
posted 6 minutes ago
Starting Kane was 100% the right decision. He’s Tottenhams talisman and him playing lifts the whole team. The mistake was playing Alli instead of Moura
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’d say more playing Son instead of Moura. Dele player really well in the SF linking up with Moura, whereas Son had been on a run of poor performances since his goals at City in the QF.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ace, come on mate. Ajax away was Dele’s first good game since about January. Son was unlucky not to make team of the season. I can’t believe more Spurs fans weren’t calling for him to be dropped for the final, instead it was Son or Moura.
posted on 16/6/19
comment by Eighties Glory Years (U22086)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Pranks- European Champions (U6283)
posted 18 minutes ago
express
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. Thank goodness. Only have to look at their weather predictions to real eyes it's all outright mockingly lies from that rag.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
they do type some complete and utter shiiiit.
posted on 16/6/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 16/6/19
Tl;dr
Kane feels entitled to get opening goal at new stadium.
Doesn't get it.
Gets himself injured (a la Gazza style) with a self-inflicted injury from a tackle.
Clearly not fit (or on form) he is played in the CL Final instead of on fire hat trick qualifying Moura from the Semi's.
We lose.
Blame it both on manager and Kane himself. All goes back to the opening of the new stadium.
Page 2 of 3