Wow, just wow.
I can’t even get my head round why someone would think posting that would be a good idea.
The problems of having a bad owner. Will be a real shame if Bowyer cant continue what he has started.
The detail is probably to do with trying to sell the club I guess. Also Bowyer is very popular so they are defending themselves to the fans.
What do you mean “not Leeds related?”
It’s totally Leeds related!
I wonder who wrote that statement. A college student? Very poor.
Indeed a very strange statement.
comment by JonnyLosAngeles (My Dad was made in Leeds) (U9756)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
What do you mean “not Leeds related?”
It’s totally Leeds related!
I wonder who wrote that statement. A college student? Very poor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well tentatively I guess.
Imagine if Radz had written that.
Wonder what Charlton fans make of it?
comment by JonnyLosAngeles (My Dad was made in Leeds) (U9756)
posted 2 hours, 37 minutes ago
What do you mean “not Leeds related?”
It’s totally Leeds related!
I wonder who wrote that statement. A college student? Very poor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully not a student of either English or media studies
Terrible
But the funny thing is, Cellino was doing weird things like this, and yet people were constantly backing him. Some who have posted on this thread.
Morale of the story.
You can support the club, without justifying bad practices from the owner, which you wouldn’t justify at other clubs
Good point very well made Wakey.
Poor tactics on behalf of Charlton hierarchy and disclosing elements of Bowyer's remuneration is unacceptable.
However, wasn't Bowyer recently applying for other vacancies?
Yet the tactics worked
https://www.cafc.co.uk/news/view/5d0886234948e/charlton-agree-contract-extension-with-addicks-boss-lee-bowyer
Personally I’m no fan of Bowyer after his contract shenanigans when leaving Leeds.
Can completely understand Charlton’s frustrations and wanting to give as much transparency as possible but was a very amateurish statement.
With government pushing to remove NDAs one hopes we get more integrity in dealings and transparency but with sums of money involved in football these days one doubts that will ever really happen.
Who wins the moral argument here?!
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
What a strange statement
Page 1 of 1
posted on 17/6/19
Wow, just wow.
I can’t even get my head round why someone would think posting that would be a good idea.
posted on 17/6/19
The problems of having a bad owner. Will be a real shame if Bowyer cant continue what he has started.
The detail is probably to do with trying to sell the club I guess. Also Bowyer is very popular so they are defending themselves to the fans.
posted on 17/6/19
What do you mean “not Leeds related?”
It’s totally Leeds related!
I wonder who wrote that statement. A college student? Very poor.
posted on 17/6/19
Indeed a very strange statement.
posted on 17/6/19
Greed !
posted on 17/6/19
comment by JonnyLosAngeles (My Dad was made in Leeds) (U9756)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
What do you mean “not Leeds related?”
It’s totally Leeds related!
I wonder who wrote that statement. A college student? Very poor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well tentatively I guess.
Imagine if Radz had written that.
Wonder what Charlton fans make of it?
posted on 17/6/19
comment by JonnyLosAngeles (My Dad was made in Leeds) (U9756)
posted 2 hours, 37 minutes ago
What do you mean “not Leeds related?”
It’s totally Leeds related!
I wonder who wrote that statement. A college student? Very poor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully not a student of either English or media studies
posted on 17/6/19
Terrible
But the funny thing is, Cellino was doing weird things like this, and yet people were constantly backing him. Some who have posted on this thread.
Morale of the story.
You can support the club, without justifying bad practices from the owner, which you wouldn’t justify at other clubs
posted on 18/6/19
Good point very well made Wakey.
Poor tactics on behalf of Charlton hierarchy and disclosing elements of Bowyer's remuneration is unacceptable.
However, wasn't Bowyer recently applying for other vacancies?
posted on 18/6/19
Yet the tactics worked
https://www.cafc.co.uk/news/view/5d0886234948e/charlton-agree-contract-extension-with-addicks-boss-lee-bowyer
posted on 18/6/19
Personally I’m no fan of Bowyer after his contract shenanigans when leaving Leeds.
Can completely understand Charlton’s frustrations and wanting to give as much transparency as possible but was a very amateurish statement.
With government pushing to remove NDAs one hopes we get more integrity in dealings and transparency but with sums of money involved in football these days one doubts that will ever really happen.
posted on 18/6/19
Who wins the moral argument here?!
Page 1 of 1