Been saying that for ages just never really ran into a no mark caaant like you, so started using it again

comment by Yoda's big brother Hulk (U1250)
posted 9 minutes ago
Been saying that for agesjust never really ran into a no mark caaant like you, so started using it again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
of course u did diddums

Why do entitled racist kvnts like Johnson & Trump end up getting called

Boris and Donald?

Everyone else gets their 2nd name.

Imagine if this story was about Corbyn and his partner. Can you imagine what the press would have made of it? Drunk male aggressively 'deals' with his female partner.


He would be hung out to dry.

Tories, think about that.

Corbyn's too busy beating up Jews 'cording to our right wing meeja.

He'll get on to the women when he's done.


These arsoles are schittin themselves about Corbyn.

all I hear from the Cons is fear of handing the keys to (an apparently unelectable) Jeremy Corbyn

You couldn't make that up

These arsoles are schittin themselves about Corbyn.
-----------------
And so are a lot of the Labour party.

comment by Pranks- European Champions (U6283)
posted 4 hours, 23 minutes ago
comment by Yoda's big brother Hulk (U1250)
posted 9 minutes ago
Been saying that for agesjust never really ran into a no mark caaant like you, so started using it again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
of course u did diddums
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pranks - don’t mind Yoda, he’s permanently angry. His missus puts a time limit on his PS4 use and he comes on here raging when it’s up. He’s an under the thumb 40 year old caant who gets slapped about by his other half

You mean the Blairite New Tory Party?

They're on the run matey.

None of Tory B-Liar's old guard left with any influence now.

First action of Corbyn would be to renationalise the railways.

Turn it back to a Service.

Not a 3rd class provider that only benefits rich investors.


They are schitting themselves.

Corbyn going to unite the country,thats after he unites the Labour party,prepare for a bit of a wait.

This 'country' has gone mental right wing looney.

Hopelessly divided.

I campaigned to keep the UK intact in the Scottish Independence

Referendum and got stick for it on the doorstep and on here.

I am now a passionate supporter of Scotland leaving the UK.

The lurch to the right in parts of England has caused that.

64% of Tory Party members said last week Brexit was more important

than keeping the United Kingdom intact.

So I say - fvk them.

Scotland will leave the UK and join Europe.

Get yer fvkin Passports out for the Edinburgh Festival or a trip

to the Scottish Highlands.

You will be entering a foreign country and the EU.

Youra buncha Tory nutters who can't even agree among yerselves


Good night gentlemen.

Conservative and Unionist party

Couple of right wing Tory priks talking about disunity in the Labour Party?

comment by Pranks- European Champions (U6283)
posted 7 hours, 52 minutes ago
comment by Scruttocks (U19684)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Pranks- European Champions (U6283)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Scruttocks (U19684)
posted 2 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by Pranks- European Champions (U6283)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Scruttocks (U19684)
posted 52 seconds ago
It's clear that Labour would be wise to adopt either a second referendum or remain stance.

There is very little voting will in general (from rightwing, centre or leftwing voters) for a measured leaving of the EU. As shown again and again in polling as well as the EU elections.

Most Brexiters have now aligned themselves with anyone willing to 'no deal' (a new deal negotiated from a position of extreme weakness after crashing out).

Since Labour have absolutely no interest in such a thing, never have and have in fact on several occasions tried to block it from even being a possibility there is no reason what-so-ever for them not to take a new remain stance. Doing anything else means they stand no chance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then explain to me why they have waited 3 years to confirm this

"a new deal negotiated from a position of extreme weakness after crashing out"

Also how do you figure we will be in a position of weakness

I voted remain and don't want a no deal however that comment you wrote is just wrong if you know anything about business and negotiation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Labour for better or worse have a Eurosceptic in charge but more importantly believe the referendum result should be honoured with a leave agreement. That's been their stance and it's what they campaigned on in the snap election

The problem is there is now very little support for a leave agreement from voters. May agreed a deal, no one wants it, Brexiters moved to a party led by Farage promising a hard brexit (absolutely what Labour do not want)...

Your comment about business and negotiation is truly hilarious and embarrassing for you.

Given how intertwined our trading arrangements are with the EU (arrangements we've been at the forefront of negotiating in our favour as one of the 3 biggest players in the EU) leaving with no deal leaves us trading on the worst possible conditions - WTO.

There would be no customs union, all goods from the EU would require checks and if you believe this would be anything other than weaker than our current arrangement you are frankly a moron. IF you believe that.

So given we would then go back to the negotiating table while out of the customs union, out of the EU and in a position of clear weakness YOU believe this sets us up for an improved deal?

You claim I know nothing about business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fack me you obviously don’t if you think we’re be in a position of extreme weakness
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you believe we'll be in a position of increased strength while trading on WTO rules after decades of being part of the EU customs union & single market?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nope i didn't say that however I certainly don't think we are in a position of extreme weakness.

If we leave with no deal it will be in both parties interest to get a deal sorted out asap.

The EU exports billions of pounds of trade to the UK every year so they won't be wanting to trade with us on WTO terms for too long as it will be doing as much harm to their businesses as ours.

There is also a fear for the EU businesses that UK Gov could strike strike trade deals with other countries and take their business elsewhere.

So to say we're in a position of extreme weakness is way off the mark.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the problem here is you have far too small understanding of the topic, I'm no expert but at least understand the basics of the situation.

The EU has over the last few years set up far more advanced plans for the event of no deal.

It already has preferential trade deals with any country of note, it's the largest trade bloc in the world and therefore carries far more bargaining power than an individual country the size of the UK.

Will the EU want to strike a deal with the UK? Of course.

Will they want to undermine the entire fabric of the bloc for the UK? No

Then bare in mind it took us two years just to come to a withdrawal agreement that no one wants.

That's just how we leave not a long term deal.

Estimates put trade deals like this at taking at least a decade, many take longer (again the UK in your scenario will need civil servants and experts working on trade deals with the rest of the world too). Not only is the UK massively understaffed and underskilled in this regard it will be up against a bloc with something like an economy 8 times the size and with the best trade negotiators in the world all the while the UK is trading the EU and likely with the rest of the world on the worst possible terms...

comment by Scruttocks (U19684)
posted 6 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by Pranks- European Champions (U6283)
posted 7 hours, 52 minutes ago
comment by Scruttocks (U19684)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Pranks- European Champions (U6283)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Scruttocks (U19684)
posted 2 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by Pranks- European Champions (U6283)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Scruttocks (U19684)
posted 52 seconds ago
It's clear that Labour would be wise to adopt either a second referendum or remain stance.

There is very little voting will in general (from rightwing, centre or leftwing voters) for a measured leaving of the EU. As shown again and again in polling as well as the EU elections.

Most Brexiters have now aligned themselves with anyone willing to 'no deal' (a new deal negotiated from a position of extreme weakness after crashing out).

Since Labour have absolutely no interest in such a thing, never have and have in fact on several occasions tried to block it from even being a possibility there is no reason what-so-ever for them not to take a new remain stance. Doing anything else means they stand no chance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then explain to me why they have waited 3 years to confirm this

"a new deal negotiated from a position of extreme weakness after crashing out"

Also how do you figure we will be in a position of weakness

I voted remain and don't want a no deal however that comment you wrote is just wrong if you know anything about business and negotiation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Labour for better or worse have a Eurosceptic in charge but more importantly believe the referendum result should be honoured with a leave agreement. That's been their stance and it's what they campaigned on in the snap election

The problem is there is now very little support for a leave agreement from voters. May agreed a deal, no one wants it, Brexiters moved to a party led by Farage promising a hard brexit (absolutely what Labour do not want)...

Your comment about business and negotiation is truly hilarious and embarrassing for you.

Given how intertwined our trading arrangements are with the EU (arrangements we've been at the forefront of negotiating in our favour as one of the 3 biggest players in the EU) leaving with no deal leaves us trading on the worst possible conditions - WTO.

There would be no customs union, all goods from the EU would require checks and if you believe this would be anything other than weaker than our current arrangement you are frankly a moron. IF you believe that.

So given we would then go back to the negotiating table while out of the customs union, out of the EU and in a position of clear weakness YOU believe this sets us up for an improved deal?

You claim I know nothing about business
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fack me you obviously don’t if you think we’re be in a position of extreme weakness
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you believe we'll be in a position of increased strength while trading on WTO rules after decades of being part of the EU customs union & single market?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nope i didn't say that however I certainly don't think we are in a position of extreme weakness.

If we leave with no deal it will be in both parties interest to get a deal sorted out asap.

The EU exports billions of pounds of trade to the UK every year so they won't be wanting to trade with us on WTO terms for too long as it will be doing as much harm to their businesses as ours.

There is also a fear for the EU businesses that UK Gov could strike strike trade deals with other countries and take their business elsewhere.

So to say we're in a position of extreme weakness is way off the mark.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the problem here is you have far too small understanding of the topic, I'm no expert but at least understand the basics of the situation.

The EU has over the last few years set up far more advanced plans for the event of no deal.

It already has preferential trade deals with any country of note, it's the largest trade bloc in the world and therefore carries far more bargaining power than an individual country the size of the UK.

Will the EU want to strike a deal with the UK? Of course.

Will they want to undermine the entire fabric of the bloc for the UK? No

Then bare in mind it took us two years just to come to a withdrawal agreement that no one wants.

That's just how we leave not a long term deal.

Estimates put trade deals like this at taking at least a decade, many take longer (again the UK in your scenario will need civil servants and experts working on trade deals with the rest of the world too). Not only is the UK massively understaffed and underskilled in this regard it will be up against a bloc with something like an economy 8 times the size and with the best trade negotiators in the world all the while the UK is trading the EU and likely with the rest of the world on the worst possible terms...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Starting your comment with a personal dig, good start I hope that gave you that little boost in confidence you obviously need

All you’ve done above is state the obvious to try and back your statement that we’re in a position of extreme weakness which I think is a massively overstated.

Personally I think if we leave with no deal there will be massive pressure on both sides (eu/uk) from big business, remainders, and just about the whole country to reach a deal as quickly as possible.

Also hopefully bobo the clown will realise the economy could head into recession unless a deal is struck quickly.

All ifs and buts. We’re see what happens.

Man has argument with his partner.......WOW. Bring back the death penalty!

comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 50 minutes ago
Man has argument with his partner.......WOW. Bring back the death penalty!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know, no trial just hang him

Hanging's too good for Johnson.

comment by Beeb (U1841)
posted 19 minutes ago

Hanging's too good for Johnson.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was thought to be a disaster waiting to happen when he became London Mayor and he was much better than expected
Perhaps he may do the same as PM
He doesn’t have to be great to be an improvement on the last few no marks

If it was Corbyn who got pi553ed and had a crashing row with his missus to the point that the scuffers we called... and if he was in the end game of an election to become PM of the UK... you Tories and your daft Tory press would have an absolute field day

Why is it that anyone who fails to agree with the left wing labour rabble is considered a Tory?