"A transfer request necessarily mean acuty will roll over whd sell"

No one said it did.

They were simply answering your question 'how does that change anything'.

It’s not just bonuses it’s the remaining contract which essentially could be millions. If a club accepts a bit but the player hasn’t asked to leave the club would have to strike a deal regarding his remaining contract.

Ie

If Leicester have a total amount in mind that they want, £70m which Utd bid but maguire is owed £6m then they aren’t getting the £70m.

If City bid £70m and Maguire is happy to hand a request in then he gets nothing and they get the full £70m.

If Leicester just don’t want to sell then I doubt this whole situation would’ve gone from we’ll only pay £60m to Utd bidding £70m and so on!

OK

Yes it means the club dotbnhave to pay the player any bonuses owed, but it doesnt necessarily impact the clubs willingness to sell

comment by Super Ed (U22147)
posted 14 minutes ago
OK

Yes it means the club dotbnhave to pay the player any bonuses owed, but it doesnt necessarily impact the clubs willingness to sell
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course, but it does change things.

An unhappy player represents a different problem for the club who own him.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 47 seconds ago
comment by Super Ed (U22147)
posted 14 minutes ago
OK

Yes it means the club dotbnhave to pay the player any bonuses owed, but it doesnt necessarily impact the clubs willingness to sell
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course, but it does change things.

An unhappy player represents a different problem for the club who own him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

But we have no reason to believe he is unhappy

comment by Super Ed (U22147)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 47 seconds ago
comment by Super Ed (U22147)
posted 14 minutes ago
OK

Yes it means the club dotbnhave to pay the player any bonuses owed, but it doesnt necessarily impact the clubs willingness to sell
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course, but it does change things.

An unhappy player represents a different problem for the club who own him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

But we have no reason to believe he is unhappy
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Again, no one claimed he was.

Oh no it’s happening

comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 3 minutes ago
Oh no it’s happening
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it finally the internet-melter that is Winston vs RDD?!

(I’ve got them both filtered )

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by rosso is facking happy (U17054)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 3 minutes ago
Oh no it’s happening
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it finally the internet-melter that is Winston vs RDD?!

(I’ve got them both filtered)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are protected oh wise one, you can rebuild the ja606 population with Sandy.

There's not really any debate, is there?

He asked a question and received an answer.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 2 minutes ago


Not even Winston would sustain a "debate" with RDD.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave

You been on holiday? Or busy bothering fish?

So whats the relevance of this to the player / transfer we are talking about ?

If he did hand in a transfer request then it would suggest he is unhappy.

comment by rosso is facking happy (U17054)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 3 minutes ago
Oh no it’s happening
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it finally the internet-melter that is Winston vs RDD?!

(I’ve got them both filtered)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought I felt a tremor.

comment by Super Ed (U22147)
posted 41 minutes ago
So whats the relevance of this to the player / transfer we are talking about ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You tell me - you asked the question.

comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 49 minutes ago


Not even Winston would sustain a "debate" with RDD.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It might beat the comment count on the cycling thread

comment by rosso is facking happy (U17054)
posted 46 minutes ago
comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 2 minutes ago


Not even Winston would sustain a "debate" with RDD.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave

You been on holiday? Or busy bothering fish?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave is Troy McClure?

comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 51 minutes ago
Exactly, Winston.

Only problem is that he doesn't accept any answer that doesn't perfectly fit with his perceptions of reality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My question was how would Maguire handing in a transfer request make Leicester any more likely to sell.

The answer I got was Maguite foregoing any monies owed by Leicester might make the difference.

I dount it would though. Its not ike City or United cant be pushed another £5 or 6m if that's what Leicester want from the deal.

"My question was how would Maguire handing in a transfer request make Leicester any more likely to sell. "

Well actually, your question was how does it change anything.

People explained that for you.

Clever Ole, luring city into placing a massive bid for a CB they don’t really need

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

100