comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Pâî§Lë¥'š _P䆆ê®ÑëÐ_ÐrÊåm§ (U1541)
posted 4 minutes ago
Chelsea didn't deserve 4 nil but I thought you're players mentlally folded in the second half which must be concerning.
The OP rating little Tammy as a seven on that performance is ridiculous. Yes he hit the post after a nice shot, but he was weak as a kitten and struggled to hold the up. He was bullied off it time and time again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He held it up pretty well I thought, had lots of nice touches, and was never dispossessed by a tackle. Maguire got the better of him a couple times which is understandable.
In regards to mentally folding, maybe, but we've been on the receiving end of heavy defeats the last couple of years, so that is nothing new, it's how we respond now. Atleast we played well. Against Bournemouth, Watford and City last few years our perfromances have been a joke.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abraham lost the ball after failing to hold it up and Utd broke quickly and scored. I think it was the third.
He was weaker than pisss yesterday I'm sorry to say.
I’m not seeing it. Chelsea didn’t have chances or look threatening at all. Tammy Welbeck didn’t cause us any problems at all. All Chelsea’s possession was in front of us. We looked the more comfortable, controlled and threatening team in the second half, even before the second goal.
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 41 seconds ago
I’m not seeing it. Chelsea didn’t have chances or look threatening at all. Tammy Welbeck didn’t cause us any problems at all. All Chelsea’s possession was in front of us. We looked the more comfortable, controlled and threatening team in the second half, even before the second goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
odd.
Even the commentators mentioned how we came out the blocks again second half.
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 4 minutes ago
I’m not seeing it. Chelsea didn’t have chances or look threatening at all. Tammy Welbeck didn’t cause us any problems at all. All Chelsea’s possession was in front of us. We looked the more comfortable, controlled and threatening team in the second half, even before the second goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tammy didn't but overall for the 1st 20 minutes of the 2nd half we were no way inferior to you. Up until you scored the 2nd I was struggling to think of anything you'd created from open play Darren.
Then it all went horribly wrong!
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 5 minutes ago
I’m not seeing it. Chelsea didn’t have chances or look threatening at all. Tammy Welbeck didn’t cause us any problems at all. All Chelsea’s possession was in front of us. We looked the more comfortable, controlled and threatening team in the second half, even before the second goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They had there chances. Hit the woodwork twice and Dea Gea made a few solid saves.
Utd's midfield had a load of gaps in the first half which Chelsea could have done better to exploit. Abraham being swatted aside didn't help. Chelsea were niave, but the scoreline flattered you.
Our decision making final third was a big weakness too, we should have even more shots, and decent chances, but barkley on several occasions, pedro and who was it who was one on one with keeper after luke shaw fell but scuffed a cross instead?
That was arguably our best chance
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 4 minutes ago
Our decision making final third was a big weakness too, we should have even more shots, and decent chances, but barkley on several occasions, pedro and who was it who was one on one with keeper after luke shaw fell but scuffed a cross instead?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mason Mount
comment by Pâî§Lë¥'š _P䆆ê®ÑëÐ_ÐrÊåm§ (U1541)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 5 minutes ago
I’m not seeing it. Chelsea didn’t have chances or look threatening at all. Tammy Welbeck didn’t cause us any problems at all. All Chelsea’s possession was in front of us. We looked the more comfortable, controlled and threatening team in the second half, even before the second goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They had there chances. Hit the woodwork twice and Dea Gea made a few solid saves.
Utd's midfield had a load of gaps in the first half which Chelsea could have done better to exploit. Abraham being swatted aside didn't help. Chelsea were niave, but the scoreline flattered you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m talking about the seconf half.
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Pâî§Lë¥'š _P䆆ê®ÑëÐ_ÐrÊåm§ (U1541)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 5 minutes ago
I’m not seeing it. Chelsea didn’t have chances or look threatening at all. Tammy Welbeck didn’t cause us any problems at all. All Chelsea’s possession was in front of us. We looked the more comfortable, controlled and threatening team in the second half, even before the second goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They had there chances. Hit the woodwork twice and Dea Gea made a few solid saves.
Utd's midfield had a load of gaps in the first half which Chelsea could have done better to exploit. Abraham being swatted aside didn't help. Chelsea were niave, but the scoreline flattered you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m talking about the seconf half.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So are we
This article looking better and better as time passed
Sign in if you want to comment
Game of two halves or...
Page 3 of 3
posted on 12/8/19
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Pâî§Lë¥'š _P䆆ê®ÑëÐ_ÐrÊåm§ (U1541)
posted 4 minutes ago
Chelsea didn't deserve 4 nil but I thought you're players mentlally folded in the second half which must be concerning.
The OP rating little Tammy as a seven on that performance is ridiculous. Yes he hit the post after a nice shot, but he was weak as a kitten and struggled to hold the up. He was bullied off it time and time again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He held it up pretty well I thought, had lots of nice touches, and was never dispossessed by a tackle. Maguire got the better of him a couple times which is understandable.
In regards to mentally folding, maybe, but we've been on the receiving end of heavy defeats the last couple of years, so that is nothing new, it's how we respond now. Atleast we played well. Against Bournemouth, Watford and City last few years our perfromances have been a joke.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abraham lost the ball after failing to hold it up and Utd broke quickly and scored. I think it was the third.
He was weaker than pisss yesterday I'm sorry to say.
posted on 12/8/19
I’m not seeing it. Chelsea didn’t have chances or look threatening at all. Tammy Welbeck didn’t cause us any problems at all. All Chelsea’s possession was in front of us. We looked the more comfortable, controlled and threatening team in the second half, even before the second goal.
posted on 12/8/19
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 41 seconds ago
I’m not seeing it. Chelsea didn’t have chances or look threatening at all. Tammy Welbeck didn’t cause us any problems at all. All Chelsea’s possession was in front of us. We looked the more comfortable, controlled and threatening team in the second half, even before the second goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
odd.
posted on 12/8/19
Even the commentators mentioned how we came out the blocks again second half.
posted on 12/8/19
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 4 minutes ago
I’m not seeing it. Chelsea didn’t have chances or look threatening at all. Tammy Welbeck didn’t cause us any problems at all. All Chelsea’s possession was in front of us. We looked the more comfortable, controlled and threatening team in the second half, even before the second goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tammy didn't but overall for the 1st 20 minutes of the 2nd half we were no way inferior to you. Up until you scored the 2nd I was struggling to think of anything you'd created from open play Darren.
Then it all went horribly wrong!
posted on 12/8/19
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 5 minutes ago
I’m not seeing it. Chelsea didn’t have chances or look threatening at all. Tammy Welbeck didn’t cause us any problems at all. All Chelsea’s possession was in front of us. We looked the more comfortable, controlled and threatening team in the second half, even before the second goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They had there chances. Hit the woodwork twice and Dea Gea made a few solid saves.
Utd's midfield had a load of gaps in the first half which Chelsea could have done better to exploit. Abraham being swatted aside didn't help. Chelsea were niave, but the scoreline flattered you.
posted on 12/8/19
Our decision making final third was a big weakness too, we should have even more shots, and decent chances, but barkley on several occasions, pedro and who was it who was one on one with keeper after luke shaw fell but scuffed a cross instead?
posted on 12/8/19
That was arguably our best chance
posted on 12/8/19
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 4 minutes ago
Our decision making final third was a big weakness too, we should have even more shots, and decent chances, but barkley on several occasions, pedro and who was it who was one on one with keeper after luke shaw fell but scuffed a cross instead?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mason Mount
posted on 12/8/19
comment by Pâî§Lë¥'š _P䆆ê®ÑëÐ_ÐrÊåm§ (U1541)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 5 minutes ago
I’m not seeing it. Chelsea didn’t have chances or look threatening at all. Tammy Welbeck didn’t cause us any problems at all. All Chelsea’s possession was in front of us. We looked the more comfortable, controlled and threatening team in the second half, even before the second goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They had there chances. Hit the woodwork twice and Dea Gea made a few solid saves.
Utd's midfield had a load of gaps in the first half which Chelsea could have done better to exploit. Abraham being swatted aside didn't help. Chelsea were niave, but the scoreline flattered you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m talking about the seconf half.
posted on 12/8/19
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Pâî§Lë¥'š _P䆆ê®ÑëÐ_ÐrÊåm§ (U1541)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 5 minutes ago
I’m not seeing it. Chelsea didn’t have chances or look threatening at all. Tammy Welbeck didn’t cause us any problems at all. All Chelsea’s possession was in front of us. We looked the more comfortable, controlled and threatening team in the second half, even before the second goal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They had there chances. Hit the woodwork twice and Dea Gea made a few solid saves.
Utd's midfield had a load of gaps in the first half which Chelsea could have done better to exploit. Abraham being swatted aside didn't help. Chelsea were niave, but the scoreline flattered you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m talking about the seconf half.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So are we
posted on 9/10/19
This article looking better and better as time passed
posted on 5/11/19
Page 3 of 3