Nothing lucky about the goals we scored. Think we lost all our games there besides yesterday which was very fortunate

Fair play we give City a good game every single time. They don’t thrash us like they do most teams, I love it.

"City have conceded 8 goals in 2 seasons i believe at home. 5 of them to Tottenham"

What? This sounds like bollox

Anyone notice how cocky Ederson was in the beginning of the game playing quarter back. Changed his mind after Lamela caught him out

comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 2 minutes ago
"City have conceded 8 goals in 2 seasons i believe at home. 5 of them to Tottenham"

What? This sounds like bollox
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's 62.5 %

City have conceded 8 goals in 2 seasons i believe at home. 5 of them to Tottenham. We are a thorn in their side
.....................
A completely made up stat

comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 1 minute ago
City have conceded 8 goals in 2 seasons i believe at home. 5 of them to Tottenham. We are a thorn in their side
.....................
A completely made up stat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
24.7% of people disagree with you.

Sounds like a shat then ?

City conceded 12 goals at home last season and 11 away from home.

So not sure what is that 8 goals come from?

I remember Everton having a hold on City for a few seasons.

Never put a trophy in the cabinet, but have some great memories away at City peppering them with a team, not stars

I think it’s the last 16 home games. I assume all comps

You need a lIorente type player or a player like firmino who has a firs touch and can link the play up to counter their pressing. Spurs wanted to play from the back with players who can 't do that like Sanchez.

By pass their midget midfield with high or diagonal balls and you have 1v1 with their mediocre defenders like Zinchenko, Otamendi or Stones.

Spurs had 3 shots and 1 was from behind half way line. Man City had 30 shots. Probably one of the worst performances away to City last 2 seasons but got lucky.

Bloody hell calm down. It was a draw

comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 52 seconds ago
Bloody hell calm down. It was a draw
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You lost 5-0 to them

And that is relevant how? We aren't celebrating a draw?

comment by The Mane Man ( life at this age is rubbish with no money #needajob) (U19731)
posted 23 minutes ago
You need a lIorente type player or a player like firmino who has a firs touch and can link the play up to counter their pressing. Spurs wanted to play from the back with players who can 't do that like Sanchez.

By pass their midget midfield with high or diagonal balls and you have 1v1 with their mediocre defenders like Zinchenko, Otamendi or Stones.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You mean Dybala? He is the missing link for me

But Son would have solved the problem with his pace behind their full back, who had an easy time yesterday.

Nevertheless 1 point collected and 2 goals scored

That'll do thank you.

Up until the Lottery win, Spurs used regularly beat up City home and away over the past 40 years, they have won something approaching 30 games, and had loss barely 10. In the Prem era, City hardly recorded a win over Spurs until the Arab takeover.

Shows you what money can do.

comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 1 minute ago
And that is relevant how? We aren't celebrating a draw?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What draw? That one you didn't get against City?

I'd rather get a 2-2 draw, then get 5-0 thrashing at home

comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 4 minutes ago
And that is relevant how? We aren't celebrating a draw?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you was celebrating not going 3-0 down

Oh dear. Clearly I am talking to a child or 2

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 30 seconds ago
Up until the Lottery win, Spurs used regularly beat up City home and away over the past 40 years, they have won something approaching 30 games, and had loss barely 10. In the Prem era, City hardly recorded a win over Spurs until the Arab takeover.

Shows you what money can do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Move on Sandy

We all know that and it's boring now, sorry mate

Fair play to them, we would do the same as them mate.

Its good to see that our club is up there with the elite on merits only. Hard graft and not Fifa game type investments.

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 21 minutes ago
Up until the Lottery win, Spurs used regularly beat up City home and away over the past 40 years, they have won something approaching 30 games, and had loss barely 10. In the Prem era, City hardly recorded a win over Spurs until the Arab takeover.

Shows you what money can do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think it makes a difference now. A club need a big turnover in a year with ffp rules. You still need to invest the money wisely. Look to Man United they are an example that money alone doesn't make you successful. A good manager and football people in the boardroom is also important.

Spurs and Liverpool have done this the last few years.

City had to invest big in their first years under the Sheikh to close the gap with the traditional clubs.

comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 hour, 34 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 30 seconds ago
Up until the Lottery win, Spurs used regularly beat up City home and away over the past 40 years, they have won something approaching 30 games, and had loss barely 10. In the Prem era, City hardly recorded a win over Spurs until the Arab takeover.

Shows you what money can do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Move on Sandy

We all know that and it's boring now, sorry mate

Fair play to them, we would do the same as them mate.

Its good to see that our club is up there with the elite on merits only. Hard graft and not Fifa game type investments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I have long ago moved on mate, just pointing out a fact.

comment by The Mane Man ( life at this age is rubbish with no money #needajob) (U19731)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 21 minutes ago
Up until the Lottery win, Spurs used regularly beat up City home and away over the past 40 years, they have won something approaching 30 games, and had loss barely 10. In the Prem era, City hardly recorded a win over Spurs until the Arab takeover.

Shows you what money can do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think it makes a difference now. A club need a big turnover in a year with ffp rules. You still need to invest the money wisely. Look to Man United they are an example that money alone doesn't make you successful. A good manager and football people in the boardroom is also important.

Spurs and Liverpool have done this the last few years.

City had to invest big in their first years under the Sheikh to close the gap with the traditional clubs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

The absolute mega money City have has made a massive difference, they had hardly won a trophy for donkey years before the lottery win, and like Chelsea before them, are now hoovering up trophies for fun.

They have spent more on their full backs, than most Prem clubs have on their entire squads.