Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
VAR has to check back to the last point the ball was put into play. Simple enough rule, applies equally to everyone.
I agree it seemed quite far to go back to call the offside, yes his foot was offside but I’d be annoyed if we had a goal like that disallowed.
But this is the current rule albeit seems to be implemented badly at the moment.
It was offside as judged by current rules.
The bigger question is is VAR making the experience of watching football better or worse?
I think it is making it worse at the moment
It`s nothing but a tool to ensure Pool win the league
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
And I dont understand the rules for using it... For example why did VAR not review the Abraham incident? I don't think it was a pen, but why not review it?
I think it’s fair - even as a Chelsea fan. It was offside - no goal. I’m not going to moan about it like the entitled Spurs fans yesterday.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Why was Adrian not red carded for the out of control and reckless challenge on Abraham
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 3 minutes ago
And I dont understand the rules for using it... For example why did VAR not review the Abraham incident? I don't think it was a pen, but why not review it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every potential controversy is reviewed in the VAR room. The fact they didn't call the ref over to take a look will have been because they didn't feel he'd made a clear and obvious error.
The offside rule is to eliminate goal hanging, how was that goal hanging?? Marginal offside rule needs chucking in the bin. VAR is for the clear and obvious errors, how was Mount's toes a clear and obvious error?
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 3 minutes ago
And I dont understand the rules for using it... For example why did VAR not review the Abraham incident? I don't think it was a pen, but why not review it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every potential controversy is reviewed in the VAR room. The fact they didn't call the ref over to take a look will have been because they didn't feel he'd made a clear and obvious error.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It didn't seem to me they reviewed the it considering how quickly the corner was takeb
It might technically have been offside but who would have spotted it in real time and who would have complained if it had been given had there been no VAR?
Bearing in mind it was supposed to be, to pick up on clear and obvious errors, why is it used to scrutinise certain decisions that take 3 or 4 minutes to decide?
If I could make an adjustment to the system it would be that the VAR times out after a set time, for example 30s. I would suggest that if a panel of video referees looking at video can't tell after a time frame like that, then it's not clear and obvious!
What would have happened if Liverpool cleared the ball and scored on the counter? Would they have pulled it back for sporting an unfair advantage?
The problem... or rather one of the problems. Is that when a goal is overturned like that it’s the equivalent of the team benefiting scoring. So they get their tails up and the next few phases of play swing in their favour
They need to be ruling it out straight away not waiting for it to hit the back of the net, that’s where the benefitting side can really get an unfair advantage
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 31 minutes ago
It didn't seem to me they reviewed the it considering how quickly the corner was takeb
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't really say, tbh. I'd appreciate tv broadcasters having a proper VAR expert to talk viewers through the exact workings of the system. Former refs just tend to be way too corporatist. But it seems to be in the broadcaster's own interest to keep even their own pundits misinformed.
Before VAR the linesman would have flagged for offside and we wouldn't be having this conversation.
The difference is the same.
comment by Klopptimus Prime - Die Unerträglichen (U1282)
posted 11 minutes ago
Before VAR the linesman would have flagged for offside and we wouldn't be having this conversation.
The difference is the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spoken like a true match thread supporter 🤣
comment by Klopptimus Prime - Die Unerträglichen (U1282)
posted 11 minutes ago
Before VAR the linesman would have flagged for offside and we wouldn't be having this conversation.
The difference is the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think a linesman could have spotted that, that was offside? And the $purs disallowed goal yesterday, Lingaards goal for England and a few others that have been highlighted this season?
Linesmen used to flag offsides like that all the time. Sometimes they'd get them wrong with a marginal onside.
Let's not try to rewrite history here.
They wouldn’t of changed it if it worked before
Nobody said it did, thanks.
“Linesmen used to flag offsides like that all the time. ”
👀
Sign in if you want to comment
Var
Page 1 of 2
posted on 22/9/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 22/9/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 22/9/19
VAR has to check back to the last point the ball was put into play. Simple enough rule, applies equally to everyone.
posted on 22/9/19
I agree it seemed quite far to go back to call the offside, yes his foot was offside but I’d be annoyed if we had a goal like that disallowed.
But this is the current rule albeit seems to be implemented badly at the moment.
posted on 22/9/19
It was offside as judged by current rules.
The bigger question is is VAR making the experience of watching football better or worse?
I think it is making it worse at the moment
posted on 22/9/19
It`s nothing but a tool to ensure Pool win the league
posted on 22/9/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 22/9/19
And I dont understand the rules for using it... For example why did VAR not review the Abraham incident? I don't think it was a pen, but why not review it?
posted on 22/9/19
I think it’s fair - even as a Chelsea fan. It was offside - no goal. I’m not going to moan about it like the entitled Spurs fans yesterday.
posted on 22/9/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 22/9/19
Why was Adrian not red carded for the out of control and reckless challenge on Abraham
posted on 22/9/19
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 3 minutes ago
And I dont understand the rules for using it... For example why did VAR not review the Abraham incident? I don't think it was a pen, but why not review it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every potential controversy is reviewed in the VAR room. The fact they didn't call the ref over to take a look will have been because they didn't feel he'd made a clear and obvious error.
posted on 22/9/19
The offside rule is to eliminate goal hanging, how was that goal hanging?? Marginal offside rule needs chucking in the bin. VAR is for the clear and obvious errors, how was Mount's toes a clear and obvious error?
posted on 22/9/19
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 3 minutes ago
And I dont understand the rules for using it... For example why did VAR not review the Abraham incident? I don't think it was a pen, but why not review it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every potential controversy is reviewed in the VAR room. The fact they didn't call the ref over to take a look will have been because they didn't feel he'd made a clear and obvious error.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It didn't seem to me they reviewed the it considering how quickly the corner was takeb
posted on 22/9/19
It might technically have been offside but who would have spotted it in real time and who would have complained if it had been given had there been no VAR?
Bearing in mind it was supposed to be, to pick up on clear and obvious errors, why is it used to scrutinise certain decisions that take 3 or 4 minutes to decide?
If I could make an adjustment to the system it would be that the VAR times out after a set time, for example 30s. I would suggest that if a panel of video referees looking at video can't tell after a time frame like that, then it's not clear and obvious!
posted on 22/9/19
What would have happened if Liverpool cleared the ball and scored on the counter? Would they have pulled it back for sporting an unfair advantage?
posted on 22/9/19
The problem... or rather one of the problems. Is that when a goal is overturned like that it’s the equivalent of the team benefiting scoring. So they get their tails up and the next few phases of play swing in their favour
They need to be ruling it out straight away not waiting for it to hit the back of the net, that’s where the benefitting side can really get an unfair advantage
posted on 22/9/19
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 31 minutes ago
It didn't seem to me they reviewed the it considering how quickly the corner was takeb
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't really say, tbh. I'd appreciate tv broadcasters having a proper VAR expert to talk viewers through the exact workings of the system. Former refs just tend to be way too corporatist. But it seems to be in the broadcaster's own interest to keep even their own pundits misinformed.
posted on 22/9/19
Before VAR the linesman would have flagged for offside and we wouldn't be having this conversation.
The difference is the same.
posted on 22/9/19
comment by Klopptimus Prime - Die Unerträglichen (U1282)
posted 11 minutes ago
Before VAR the linesman would have flagged for offside and we wouldn't be having this conversation.
The difference is the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spoken like a true match thread supporter 🤣
posted on 22/9/19
comment by Klopptimus Prime - Die Unerträglichen (U1282)
posted 11 minutes ago
Before VAR the linesman would have flagged for offside and we wouldn't be having this conversation.
The difference is the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think a linesman could have spotted that, that was offside? And the $purs disallowed goal yesterday, Lingaards goal for England and a few others that have been highlighted this season?
posted on 22/9/19
Linesmen used to flag offsides like that all the time. Sometimes they'd get them wrong with a marginal onside.
Let's not try to rewrite history here.
posted on 22/9/19
They wouldn’t of changed it if it worked before
posted on 22/9/19
Nobody said it did, thanks.
posted on 22/9/19
“Linesmen used to flag offsides like that all the time. ”
👀
Page 1 of 2