or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 351 comments are related to an article called:

BERNANDO BANNED

Page 9 of 15

posted on 14/11/19

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 14/11/19

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 24 minutes ago
Greatteamswinit4times- a terrible enemy (U6008)

By the people strongly defending Suarez and then strongly criticising Silva. I don't believe it's possible to do that without being hypocritical.

As I said, having the opinion is fine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i would have to agree at this remove.

At the time suarez story was one where it was a feeling of fit up and evra having been sent out to get a reaction to get a red card.

However the t shirts came after fa decision and was silly.

in 2019 however people should know better and the suarez incident woudnt be allowed to fester if it occurred today.

the silva case is very different. Its more of a i can't beleive you idtiots think the internet is not a public place and i can't beleive after all the education you are supposedly given that you didn't think twice.

silly boy... thats where most people in the middle at at imo. Its two guys joking with each other i suppose but everyone piles in one way or the other then. trolling.

posted on 14/11/19

So...does Mendy look like this character...?

I think flores at Watford looks like Gregory House (Hugh Lawrie)
Is this racist or actorist - just wondering

posted on 14/11/19

comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 45 seconds ago
So...does Mendy look like this character...?

I think flores at Watford looks like Gregory House (Hugh Lawrie)
Is this racist or actorist - just wondering
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok...show of hands...who just googled this

posted on 14/11/19


I think flores at Watford looks like Gregory House (Hugh Lawrie)
Is this racist or actorist - just wondering
------------------------------------------------
I've been saying that since he first arrived at Watford.

At last, someone agrees with me.

posted on 14/11/19

No one looks like anything

posted on 14/11/19

comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 55 minutes ago
No one looks like anything
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do they. .not seen these two together...I'll Google it

posted on 14/11/19

comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Finlay Robertson (U1734)
posted 55 minutes ago
No one looks like anything
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do they. .not seen these two together...I'll Google it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Googled no one....it says see anyone...you were right

posted on 14/11/19

lookey likeys are great but not if they are from sweet packets ,then its bad really bad

posted on 14/11/19

comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 2 hours, 46 minutes ago
So...does Mendy look like this character...?

I think flores at Watford looks like Gregory House (Hugh Lawrie)
Is this racist or actorist - just wondering
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Is Hugh Lawrie a cartoon based on racist tropes?

No.

posted on 14/11/19

I wonder how many, if any, people objecting to the comparison have any idea of the apparent history of this cartoon.

A cartoon that is perfectly legal, as I understand it.

Hmm.

posted on 14/11/19

The image of the product, a fictitious aboriginal of color, smiling and of a good life, baptized by José Luis Izaguerri as Conguito, was born in 1961 by Spanish veteran publicist Juan Tudela Férez as his first illustrator job for an agency in Zaragoza . The idea was born under the influence of the recent independence of the Belgian Congo .

The design changed throughout its history to adapt to the times, one of the most notable changes being the replacement of the tribal spear with a hand with the thumb raised in approval.

posted on 14/11/19

comment by Greatteamswinit4times- a terrible enemy (U6008)
posted 14 hours, 51 minutes ago
comment by RED666👺. (U6562)
posted 7 hours, 50 minutes ago
comment by KLS - Harry Kane wears Mo Salah pyjamas (U1695)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by RED666👺. (U6562)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CanULeiva (U18359)
posted 4 hours, 12 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by CanULeiva (U18359)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by CanULeiva (U18359)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
‘His views are racist’

What utter ballacks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're thick
----------------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------
So his tweet wasn't deemed racist? Ok then
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You said he had racist views.

Stop trying to move the goalposts soft lad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Soft lad

His tweet is his view in the comments above

What do you not understand ?

I've read he's made 2 potentially racist tweets towards mendey so i assume these are his views? No
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t Suárez make a reference to the colour of Evra’s skin?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Called him black.

He is black isn’t he?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But he admitted to insulting him making reference to the colour of Evra’s skin!

If Silva has only been given a one match for what some of you claim was a racist tweet then the Eight match ban which Suárez got shows what a racist Suárez was and cannot be defended anymore by the fans and the club.

Even Carragher said the club was wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Shows what a racist Suarez was even though the fa and Evra said they didn't think Suarez was a racist.
The context of the two is obviously completely different and deserve to be treated differently. Barnardo's ban has nothing to do with suarez.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why is the context different?

posted on 14/11/19

Robbing, the fact you need to search online to explain why you’re offended probably proves my point.

posted on 14/11/19

Yer probably

posted on 14/11/19

‘Hmm, someone has complained about that image. I’m going to search online to see if I need to be offended as well’.

posted on 14/11/19

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
Robbing, the fact you need to search online to explain why you’re offended probably proves my point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Winston It certainly proves Hoody is full of Shiite!👍

posted on 14/11/19

Or,

That looks like it's based on racist tropes. Turns out it is.

I remember gollys being banned very clearly and unfortunately I was read the books as a child but I'm not offended in the slightest, I just think it was stupid.

posted on 14/11/19

As I said, you had to search to find out whether you needed to be offended or not. Says it all.

posted on 14/11/19

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 14/11/19

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
As I said, you had to search to find out whether you needed to be offended or not. Says it all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Literally just wrote Im not offended in the slightest. It doesnt say it all either. It's history means little but it certainly doesnt help.

I suspect you didnt know it's history though.

posted on 14/11/19

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 14/11/19

comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
As I said, you had to search to find out whether you needed to be offended or not. Says it all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Literally just wrote Im not offended in the slightest. It doesnt say it all either. It's history means little but it certainly doesnt help.

I suspect you didnt know it's history though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I suspect the vast majority of people who claim to have an issue with it didn’t know. I suspect the people involved didn’t know.

If you need to look something up to have a problem with it then you don’t really have a problem.

And as I said, it’s used legally. If it were an illegal image it’d be different.

Yours and many others reaction is pathetic.

posted on 14/11/19

comment by Greatteamswinit4times- a terrible enemy (U6008)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 38 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
As I said, you had to search to find out whether you needed to be offended or not. Says it all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Literally just wrote Im not offended in the slightest. It doesnt say it all either. It's history means little but it certainly doesnt help.

I suspect you didnt know it's history though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think he does. He's probably more qualified than most remember.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The troll returns

posted on 14/11/19

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Page 9 of 15

Sign in if you want to comment