or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 1322 comments are related to an article called:

Labour

Page 19 of 53

posted on 22/11/19

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 6 hours, 6 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
HB Fash (U21935)

No, I made a comment that whilst I see JC as a better person, some sections of the population don't.

You're clearly too immature to be having this discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WRONG

"If you read back it was my comment about how some sections of the country don't regard JC as a better person than BJ."

You compared the two before i did, but weren't willing to take criticism of your man Johnson deciding it was whataboutery and only willing to discuss Anti-semitism but not willing at all to discusss Islamaphobia in the Tory party.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
HB

Is antisemitism not a smear in Corbyn labour?

But islamophobia in tory ranks real?



posted on 22/11/19

Those here, including knrerash and wwspd keep claiming jezza was talking to the ra to get peace, but he was supporting them in their murder campaign and giving then political cover, even when Provo bombers were blowing up London and fellow mps in England and NI.

The Irish left, moderate Irish nationalists and unionists warned Corbyn not to support the ra, because they are sectarian gang, but jezza and McDonnell knew best, as they back national liberation gangs....and enemies of the UK and West especially.

McDonnell has Provo pics on his office wall and jezza addressed ra chanting mobs in Islington Archway, and Corbyn himself sings ra songs, thinking them some romantic freedom movement....again, poor judgement.

He was supporting the ra almost two decades before the GFA and jezza was not part of the peace process at all, but a useful idiot for Adams and murder squads

Of course the British ike Major spoke to the ra, but they did not support the ra...that is the big difference.

Like his stance on Islamists, and Castro and Venezuela and the ussr/ Putin....jezza gets it wrong.

He is not that bright and easily led.

posted on 22/11/19

What’s happened to Rees Mogg? Is he in hiding?

posted on 22/11/19

comment by Chelsea1 (U22265)
posted 27 minutes ago
What’s happened to Rees Mogg? Is he in hiding?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He has gone back to the nineteenth century.

posted on 22/11/19

comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 22 hours, 16 minutes ago
People who want a 4 day week are just lazy waankers.

Aka Labour supporters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The middle ages called.

They want their rationale back.

posted on 23/11/19

comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)

posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago

Those here, including knrerash and wwspd keep claiming jezza was talking to the ra to get peace, but he was supporting them in their murder campaign and giving then political cover, even when Provo bombers were blowing up London and fellow mps in England and NI.

The Irish left, moderate Irish nationalists and unionists warned Corbyn not to support the ra, because they are sectarian gang, but jezza and McDonnell knew best, as they back national liberation gangs....and enemies of the UK and West especially.

McDonnell has Provo pics on his office wall and jezza addressed ra chanting mobs in Islington Archway, and Corbyn himself sings ra songs, thinking them some romantic freedom movement....again, poor judgement.

He was supporting the ra almost two decades before the GFA and jezza was not part of the peace process at all, but a useful idiot for Adams and murder squads

Of course the British ike Major spoke to the ra, but they did not support the ra...that is the big difference.

Like his stance on Islamists, and Castro and Venezuela and the ussr/ Putin....jezza gets it wrong.

He is not that bright and easily led.
------
Despite all that and your other posts regarding antisemitism you mentioned, he's still a better choice than BJ.

posted on 23/11/19

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 3 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)

posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago

Those here, including knrerash and wwspd keep claiming jezza was talking to the ra to get peace, but he was supporting them in their murder campaign and giving then political cover, even when Provo bombers were blowing up London and fellow mps in England and NI.

The Irish left, moderate Irish nationalists and unionists warned Corbyn not to support the ra, because they are sectarian gang, but jezza and McDonnell knew best, as they back national liberation gangs....and enemies of the UK and West especially.

McDonnell has Provo pics on his office wall and jezza addressed ra chanting mobs in Islington Archway, and Corbyn himself sings ra songs, thinking them some romantic freedom movement....again, poor judgement.

He was supporting the ra almost two decades before the GFA and jezza was not part of the peace process at all, but a useful idiot for Adams and murder squads

Of course the British ike Major spoke to the ra, but they did not support the ra...that is the big difference.

Like his stance on Islamists, and Castro and Venezuela and the ussr/ Putin....jezza gets it wrong.

He is not that bright and easily led.
------
Despite all that and your other posts regarding antisemitism you mentioned, he's still a better choice than BJ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What’s nice is how many people on here feel qualified to rule out any concerns regarding antisemitism or to tell us how important this is in the context of the election.

I’m sure the Jewish community are grateful for the clarification.

posted on 23/11/19

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 23/11/19

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 3 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)

posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago

Those here, including knrerash and wwspd keep claiming jezza was talking to the ra to get peace, but he was supporting them in their murder campaign and giving then political cover, even when Provo bombers were blowing up London and fellow mps in England and NI.

The Irish left, moderate Irish nationalists and unionists warned Corbyn not to support the ra, because they are sectarian gang, but jezza and McDonnell knew best, as they back national liberation gangs....and enemies of the UK and West especially.

McDonnell has Provo pics on his office wall and jezza addressed ra chanting mobs in Islington Archway, and Corbyn himself sings ra songs, thinking them some romantic freedom movement....again, poor judgement.

He was supporting the ra almost two decades before the GFA and jezza was not part of the peace process at all, but a useful idiot for Adams and murder squads

Of course the British ike Major spoke to the ra, but they did not support the ra...that is the big difference.

Like his stance on Islamists, and Castro and Venezuela and the ussr/ Putin....jezza gets it wrong.

He is not that bright and easily led.
------
Despite all that and your other posts regarding antisemitism you mentioned, he's still a better choice than BJ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What’s nice is how many people on here feel qualified to rule out any concerns regarding antisemitism or to tell us how important this is in the context of the election.

I’m sure the Jewish community are grateful for the clarification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed.

posted on 23/11/19

comment by Greatteamswinit4times- a terrible enemy (U6008)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)
posted 13 hours, 12 minutes ago
Those here, including knrerash and wwspd keep claiming jezza was talking to the ra to get peace, but he was supporting them in their murder campaign and giving then political cover, even when Provo bombers were blowing up London and fellow mps in England and NI.

The Irish left, moderate Irish nationalists and unionists warned Corbyn not to support the ra, because they are sectarian gang, but jezza and McDonnell knew best, as they back national liberation gangs....and enemies of the UK and West especially.

McDonnell has Provo pics on his office wall and jezza addressed ra chanting mobs in Islington Archway, and Corbyn himself sings ra songs, thinking them some romantic freedom movement....again, poor judgement.

He was supporting the ra almost two decades before the GFA and jezza was not part of the peace process at all, but a useful idiot for Adams and murder squads

Of course the British ike Major spoke to the ra, but they did not support the ra...that is the big difference.

Like his stance on Islamists, and Castro and Venezuela and the ussr/ Putin....jezza gets it wrong.

He is not that bright and easily led.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

State of this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Elaborate.

posted on 23/11/19

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 3 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)

posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago

Those here, including knrerash and wwspd keep claiming jezza was talking to the ra to get peace, but he was supporting them in their murder campaign and giving then political cover, even when Provo bombers were blowing up London and fellow mps in England and NI.

The Irish left, moderate Irish nationalists and unionists warned Corbyn not to support the ra, because they are sectarian gang, but jezza and McDonnell knew best, as they back national liberation gangs....and enemies of the UK and West especially.

McDonnell has Provo pics on his office wall and jezza addressed ra chanting mobs in Islington Archway, and Corbyn himself sings ra songs, thinking them some romantic freedom movement....again, poor judgement.

He was supporting the ra almost two decades before the GFA and jezza was not part of the peace process at all, but a useful idiot for Adams and murder squads

Of course the British ike Major spoke to the ra, but they did not support the ra...that is the big difference.

Like his stance on Islamists, and Castro and Venezuela and the ussr/ Putin....jezza gets it wrong.

He is not that bright and easily led.
------
Despite all that and your other posts regarding antisemitism you mentioned, he's still a better choice than BJ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Faint praise, mate lol.

There are other options.

Not binary.

posted on 23/11/19

comment by Greatteamswinit4times- a terrible enemy (U6008)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)
posted 13 hours, 12 minutes ago
Those here, including knrerash and wwspd keep claiming jezza was talking to the ra to get peace, but he was supporting them in their murder campaign and giving then political cover, even when Provo bombers were blowing up London and fellow mps in England and NI.

The Irish left, moderate Irish nationalists and unionists warned Corbyn not to support the ra, because they are sectarian gang, but jezza and McDonnell knew best, as they back national liberation gangs....and enemies of the UK and West especially.

McDonnell has Provo pics on his office wall and jezza addressed ra chanting mobs in Islington Archway, and Corbyn himself sings ra songs, thinking them some romantic freedom movement....again, poor judgement.

He was supporting the ra almost two decades before the GFA and jezza was not part of the peace process at all, but a useful idiot for Adams and murder squads

Of course the British ike Major spoke to the ra, but they did not support the ra...that is the big difference.

Like his stance on Islamists, and Castro and Venezuela and the ussr/ Putin....jezza gets it wrong.

He is not that bright and easily led.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

State of this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Back in the eighties I saw jezza in the flesh in Archway supporting a Provo parade through a London that was being bombed by the ra....so please explain yourself.

Would you be cool with jezza addressing and backing an Isis mob after they killed londoners at Westminster bridge or Manchester Arena, as that is a precise analogy on how Corbyn behaved.

Looking forward to you countering my posts with more than two word efforts.

posted on 23/11/19

The bojo WAB has worried loyalists here in Ulster, and Len McCluskey reported via the Spectator that the loyalist paramilitaries are meeting daily on the Irish sea border and all Ireland eu issue.

When has jezza met loyalists to encourage peace???

Is jezza arranging to talk to the UFF today, to keep the peace, and will I see him at loyalist events soon?

For peace, of course.🤣🤣

When has he addressed a loyalist crowd?

Has McDonnell got loyalist pics on his office wall.

Does jezza talk to Israel for peace?

posted on 23/11/19

comment by Winston (U16525)

posted 31 minutes ago

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 3 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)

posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago

Those here, including knrerash and wwspd keep claiming jezza was talking to the ra to get peace, but he was supporting them in their murder campaign and giving then political cover, even when Provo bombers were blowing up London and fellow mps in England and NI.

The Irish left, moderate Irish nationalists and unionists warned Corbyn not to support the ra, because they are sectarian gang, but jezza and McDonnell knew best, as they back national liberation gangs....and enemies of the UK and West especially.

McDonnell has Provo pics on his office wall and jezza addressed ra chanting mobs in Islington Archway, and Corbyn himself sings ra songs, thinking them some romantic freedom movement....again, poor judgement.

He was supporting the ra almost two decades before the GFA and jezza was not part of the peace process at all, but a useful idiot for Adams and murder squads

Of course the British ike Major spoke to the ra, but they did not support the ra...that is the big difference.

Like his stance on Islamists, and Castro and Venezuela and the ussr/ Putin....jezza gets it wrong.

He is not that bright and easily led.
------
Despite all that and your other posts regarding antisemitism you mentioned, he's still a better choice than BJ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What’s nice is how many people on here feel qualified to rule out any concerns regarding antisemitism or to tell us how important this is in the context of the election.

I’m sure the Jewish community are grateful for the clarification.
-----
Yet the question is why is there hardly any concerns about same issues in the Tory party? Theirs seem little to no concern to those who keep bringing up the same point as you Winston. It seems one group being attacked is more important than other groups or the same group being attacked by Labour is seen more heinous than when it's done by Tories.

posted on 23/11/19

comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)

posted 19 minutes ago

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 3 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)

posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago

Those here, including knrerash and wwspd keep claiming jezza was talking to the ra to get peace, but he was supporting them in their murder campaign and giving then political cover, even when Provo bombers were blowing up London and fellow mps in England and NI.

The Irish left, moderate Irish nationalists and unionists warned Corbyn not to support the ra, because they are sectarian gang, but jezza and McDonnell knew best, as they back national liberation gangs....and enemies of the UK and West especially.

McDonnell has Provo pics on his office wall and jezza addressed ra chanting mobs in Islington Archway, and Corbyn himself sings ra songs, thinking them some romantic freedom movement....again, poor judgement.

He was supporting the ra almost two decades before the GFA and jezza was not part of the peace process at all, but a useful idiot for Adams and murder squads

Of course the British ike Major spoke to the ra, but they did not support the ra...that is the big difference.

Like his stance on Islamists, and Castro and Venezuela and the ussr/ Putin....jezza gets it wrong.

He is not that bright and easily led.
------
Despite all that and your other posts regarding antisemitism you mentioned, he's still a better choice than BJ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Faint praise, mate lol.

There are other options.

Not binary.
----------
If the Greens had a realistic chance of winning, I'd vote for them. Even the raving looney monster party. All other options is deciding who is the least worst of the bunch.

posted on 23/11/19

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)

posted 31 minutes ago

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 3 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)

posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago

Those here, including knrerash and wwspd keep claiming jezza was talking to the ra to get peace, but he was supporting them in their murder campaign and giving then political cover, even when Provo bombers were blowing up London and fellow mps in England and NI.

The Irish left, moderate Irish nationalists and unionists warned Corbyn not to support the ra, because they are sectarian gang, but jezza and McDonnell knew best, as they back national liberation gangs....and enemies of the UK and West especially.

McDonnell has Provo pics on his office wall and jezza addressed ra chanting mobs in Islington Archway, and Corbyn himself sings ra songs, thinking them some romantic freedom movement....again, poor judgement.

He was supporting the ra almost two decades before the GFA and jezza was not part of the peace process at all, but a useful idiot for Adams and murder squads

Of course the British ike Major spoke to the ra, but they did not support the ra...that is the big difference.

Like his stance on Islamists, and Castro and Venezuela and the ussr/ Putin....jezza gets it wrong.

He is not that bright and easily led.
------
Despite all that and your other posts regarding antisemitism you mentioned, he's still a better choice than BJ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What’s nice is how many people on here feel qualified to rule out any concerns regarding antisemitism or to tell us how important this is in the context of the election.

I’m sure the Jewish community are grateful for the clarification.
-----
Yet the question is why is there hardly any concerns about same issues in the Tory party? Theirs seem little to no concern to those who keep bringing up the same point as you Winston. It seems one group being attacked is more important than other groups or the same group being attacked by Labour is seen more heinous than when it's done by Tories.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In fairness, everything that irritates me about the entrenched Labour position on this thread also applies to entrenched Tory positions from the other side of the argument.

posted on 23/11/19

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)

posted 19 minutes ago

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 3 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)

posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago

Those here, including knrerash and wwspd keep claiming jezza was talking to the ra to get peace, but he was supporting them in their murder campaign and giving then political cover, even when Provo bombers were blowing up London and fellow mps in England and NI.

The Irish left, moderate Irish nationalists and unionists warned Corbyn not to support the ra, because they are sectarian gang, but jezza and McDonnell knew best, as they back national liberation gangs....and enemies of the UK and West especially.

McDonnell has Provo pics on his office wall and jezza addressed ra chanting mobs in Islington Archway, and Corbyn himself sings ra songs, thinking them some romantic freedom movement....again, poor judgement.

He was supporting the ra almost two decades before the GFA and jezza was not part of the peace process at all, but a useful idiot for Adams and murder squads

Of course the British ike Major spoke to the ra, but they did not support the ra...that is the big difference.

Like his stance on Islamists, and Castro and Venezuela and the ussr/ Putin....jezza gets it wrong.

He is not that bright and easily led.
------
Despite all that and your other posts regarding antisemitism you mentioned, he's still a better choice than BJ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Faint praise, mate lol.

There are other options.

Not binary.
----------
If the Greens had a realistic chance of winning, I'd vote for them. Even the raving looney monster party. All other options is deciding who is the least worst of the bunch.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I hsve voted Green here in NI and if more vote for any party it does influence the main parties...see UKIP and Tory, and how All parties claim to go green now.

Some green policies appear out there, but then bojo and jezza lol

posted on 23/11/19

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)

posted 31 minutes ago

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 3 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)

posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago

Those here, including knrerash and wwspd keep claiming jezza was talking to the ra to get peace, but he was supporting them in their murder campaign and giving then political cover, even when Provo bombers were blowing up London and fellow mps in England and NI.

The Irish left, moderate Irish nationalists and unionists warned Corbyn not to support the ra, because they are sectarian gang, but jezza and McDonnell knew best, as they back national liberation gangs....and enemies of the UK and West especially.

McDonnell has Provo pics on his office wall and jezza addressed ra chanting mobs in Islington Archway, and Corbyn himself sings ra songs, thinking them some romantic freedom movement....again, poor judgement.

He was supporting the ra almost two decades before the GFA and jezza was not part of the peace process at all, but a useful idiot for Adams and murder squads

Of course the British ike Major spoke to the ra, but they did not support the ra...that is the big difference.

Like his stance on Islamists, and Castro and Venezuela and the ussr/ Putin....jezza gets it wrong.

He is not that bright and easily led.
------
Despite all that and your other posts regarding antisemitism you mentioned, he's still a better choice than BJ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What’s nice is how many people on here feel qualified to rule out any concerns regarding antisemitism or to tell us how important this is in the context of the election.

I’m sure the Jewish community are grateful for the clarification.
-----
Yet the question is why is there hardly any concerns about same issues in the Tory party? Theirs seem little to no concern to those who keep bringing up the same point as you Winston. It seems one group being attacked is more important than other groups or the same group being attacked by Labour is seen more heinous than when it's done by Tories.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Racism in the bnp or UKIP or Tory party should get scrutiny too, mate...no question.

Just seems more rife in Labour according to EHRC investigation.

posted on 23/11/19

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 56 minutes ago
comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)

posted 31 minutes ago

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 3 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)

posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago

Those here, including knrerash and wwspd keep claiming jezza was talking to the ra to get peace, but he was supporting them in their murder campaign and giving then political cover, even when Provo bombers were blowing up London and fellow mps in England and NI.

The Irish left, moderate Irish nationalists and unionists warned Corbyn not to support the ra, because they are sectarian gang, but jezza and McDonnell knew best, as they back national liberation gangs....and enemies of the UK and West especially.

McDonnell has Provo pics on his office wall and jezza addressed ra chanting mobs in Islington Archway, and Corbyn himself sings ra songs, thinking them some romantic freedom movement....again, poor judgement.

He was supporting the ra almost two decades before the GFA and jezza was not part of the peace process at all, but a useful idiot for Adams and murder squads

Of course the British ike Major spoke to the ra, but they did not support the ra...that is the big difference.

Like his stance on Islamists, and Castro and Venezuela and the ussr/ Putin....jezza gets it wrong.

He is not that bright and easily led.
------
Despite all that and your other posts regarding antisemitism you mentioned, he's still a better choice than BJ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What’s nice is how many people on here feel qualified to rule out any concerns regarding antisemitism or to tell us how important this is in the context of the election.

I’m sure the Jewish community are grateful for the clarification.
-----
Yet the question is why is there hardly any concerns about same issues in the Tory party? Theirs seem little to no concern to those who keep bringing up the same point as you Winston. It seems one group being attacked is more important than other groups or the same group being attacked by Labour is seen more heinous than when it's done by Tories.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In fairness, everything that irritates me about the entrenched Labour position on this thread also applies to entrenched Tory positions from the other side of the argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is fair...on ja606 though there are not many Tories, so that affects debate.

If I slate Corbyn, I am Tory, but never voted that way and doubt I ever will.

posted on 23/11/19

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)

posted 31 minutes ago

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 3 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)

posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago

Those here, including knrerash and wwspd keep claiming jezza was talking to the ra to get peace, but he was supporting them in their murder campaign and giving then political cover, even when Provo bombers were blowing up London and fellow mps in England and NI.

The Irish left, moderate Irish nationalists and unionists warned Corbyn not to support the ra, because they are sectarian gang, but jezza and McDonnell knew best, as they back national liberation gangs....and enemies of the UK and West especially.

McDonnell has Provo pics on his office wall and jezza addressed ra chanting mobs in Islington Archway, and Corbyn himself sings ra songs, thinking them some romantic freedom movement....again, poor judgement.

He was supporting the ra almost two decades before the GFA and jezza was not part of the peace process at all, but a useful idiot for Adams and murder squads

Of course the British ike Major spoke to the ra, but they did not support the ra...that is the big difference.

Like his stance on Islamists, and Castro and Venezuela and the ussr/ Putin....jezza gets it wrong.

He is not that bright and easily led.
------
Despite all that and your other posts regarding antisemitism you mentioned, he's still a better choice than BJ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What’s nice is how many people on here feel qualified to rule out any concerns regarding antisemitism or to tell us how important this is in the context of the election.

I’m sure the Jewish community are grateful for the clarification.
-----
Yet the question is why is there hardly any concerns about same issues in the Tory party? Theirs seem little to no concern to those who keep bringing up the same point as you Winston. It seems one group being attacked is more important than other groups or the same group being attacked by Labour is seen more heinous than when it's done by Tories.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well this is utter nonsense.

There are related concerns about the right wing aspect of the Tories. I can’t see how anyone would claim otherwise.

posted on 23/11/19

Is it? There is little mention of other groups that have had hate directed at them by the Tories for example. We had now and then the Islamaphobia ones but that's hardly as sustained or dripped fed into the media as the accusations of Antisemitism in Labour. The fact that 15+ had been reinstated into the party with little to no punishment or apologises (one was reinstated after a 1 day workshop into racism). Yet the EHRC has yet to luach an investigation into them. Have they even published their investigation into Labour yet?

Why is it that Jews concerns are taken seriously yet those of Muslims and Black's that have been targeted by Tories gained little to no coverage in the media or any backlash from mainstream society? Are their concerns not meant much?

Labour on the otherhand has taken steps and has expelled people who have been found to be antisemitic. Not just simply accused to be. There has been plenty of that yet when most came to give evidence on it many of it has been found wanting.

There is one group trying to clean up while the other has just brushed it under the carpet.

posted on 23/11/19

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 24 minutes ago
Is it? There is little mention of other groups that have had hate directed at them by the Tories for example. We had now and then the Islamaphobia ones but that's hardly as sustained or dripped fed into the media as the accusations of Antisemitism in Labour. The fact that 15+ had been reinstated into the party with little to no punishment or apologises (one was reinstated after a 1 day workshop into racism). Yet the EHRC has yet to luach an investigation into them. Have they even published their investigation into Labour yet?

Why is it that Jews concerns are taken seriously yet those of Muslims and Black's that have been targeted by Tories gained little to no coverage in the media or any backlash from mainstream society? Are their concerns not meant much?

Labour on the otherhand has taken steps and has expelled people who have been found to be antisemitic. Not just simply accused to be. There has been plenty of that yet when most came to give evidence on it many of it has been found wanting.

There is one group trying to clean up while the other has just brushed it under the carpet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What a load of absolute nonsense!

posted on 23/11/19

comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 24 minutes ago
Is it? There is little mention of other groups that have had hate directed at them by the Tories for example. We had now and then the Islamaphobia ones but that's hardly as sustained or dripped fed into the media as the accusations of Antisemitism in Labour. The fact that 15+ had been reinstated into the party with little to no punishment or apologises (one was reinstated after a 1 day workshop into racism). Yet the EHRC has yet to luach an investigation into them. Have they even published their investigation into Labour yet?

Why is it that Jews concerns are taken seriously yet those of Muslims and Black's that have been targeted by Tories gained little to no coverage in the media or any backlash from mainstream society? Are their concerns not meant much?

Labour on the otherhand has taken steps and has expelled people who have been found to be antisemitic. Not just simply accused to be. There has been plenty of that yet when most came to give evidence on it many of it has been found wanting.

There is one group trying to clean up while the other has just brushed it under the carpet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What a load of absolute nonsense!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How so?

posted on 23/11/19

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 1 hour, 52 minutes ago
Is it? There is little mention of other groups that have had hate directed at them by the Tories for example. We had now and then the Islamaphobia ones but that's hardly as sustained or dripped fed into the media as the accusations of Antisemitism in Labour. The fact that 15+ had been reinstated into the party with little to no punishment or apologises (one was reinstated after a 1 day workshop into racism). Yet the EHRC has yet to luach an investigation into them. Have they even published their investigation into Labour yet?

Why is it that Jews concerns are taken seriously yet those of Muslims and Black's that have been targeted by Tories gained little to no coverage in the media or any backlash from mainstream society? Are their concerns not meant much?

Labour on the otherhand has taken steps and has expelled people who have been found to be antisemitic. Not just simply accused to be. There has been plenty of that yet when most came to give evidence on it many of it has been found wanting.

There is one group trying to clean up while the other has just brushed it under the carpet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think perhaps your bias is clouding your judgement.

I’ve seen plenty of mainstream media debating the right wing element of the Conservatives.

But I guess you see what you want to see.

posted on 23/11/19

comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 2 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 24 minutes ago
Is it? There is little mention of other groups that have had hate directed at them by the Tories for example. We had now and then the Islamaphobia ones but that's hardly as sustained or dripped fed into the media as the accusations of Antisemitism in Labour. The fact that 15+ had been reinstated into the party with little to no punishment or apologises (one was reinstated after a 1 day workshop into racism). Yet the EHRC has yet to luach an investigation into them. Have they even published their investigation into Labour yet?

Why is it that Jews concerns are taken seriously yet those of Muslims and Black's that have been targeted by Tories gained little to no coverage in the media or any backlash from mainstream society? Are their concerns not meant much?

Labour on the otherhand has taken steps and has expelled people who have been found to be antisemitic. Not just simply accused to be. There has been plenty of that yet when most came to give evidence on it many of it has been found wanting.

There is one group trying to clean up while the other has just brushed it under the carpet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What a load of absolute nonsense!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ola Brummie.

You were spot on regarding jezza and his support for the ra, as a backbencher, not involved in peace talks, but a useful idiot for the thugs bombing London and Brum and Belfast, and jezza backed their murder campaign and goal, and did not meet unionist or loyalists, or address our community, because jezza was meeting SF for peace, but for solidarity.

And Jewish people decide what jezza and Labour are regarding their community...not Corbyn cultists.



Page 19 of 53

Sign in if you want to comment