Why though they were both brilliant free kicks thats the takers job and same goes for the goalkeeper and by the the way they are both professionals in their trade.

Was the England goalkeeper playing because he was the best in his field at the time.

In otherwards have some respect.

For the free kick taker I mean, obviously he wasnt David Beckham i mean if you studied all his free-kicks im sure you could find a flaw with some of the goal-keepers contributions but he was regarded as a faultless free-kick taker down in the southern parts.

comment by MURRAYIN3WIMBLEDON (U18928)
posted 3 minutes ago
Why though they were both brilliant free kicks thats the takers job and same goes for the goalkeeper and by the the way they are both professionals in their trade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They thought they were possible to save
We know they were decent but the keeper could and probably should have done better

Pointing that out is reasonable

comment by MURRAYIN3WIMBLEDON (U18928)
posted 17 minutes ago
Was the England goalkeeper playing because he was the best in his field at the time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As judged by the manager I assume so

comment by MURRAYIN3WIMBLEDON (U18928)
posted 17 minutes ago
In otherwards have some respect.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes the keeper didn’t really deserve it
But that’s pundits for you

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Duke arent you a rangers fan and not a celtic fan im a neutral.

I do Silver dont you or are you from another planet, haha😀

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Some of his finest moments were probably over a decade ago now but Naka gave us some memories.