or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 102 comments are related to an article called:

Underwhelmed

Page 2 of 5

posted on 18/1/20

comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
DC is right.

No way are Celtic going to splash out £20m on fees and pay the wages that such a player would command.

I’d be stunned if we even bought another £9m player again in the foreseeable unless it was after we had had them on loan and effectively had guaranteed a performance level as Edouard did. We didn’t just go out and pay £9m for someone we’d merely had scouted. He had been with us for some time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disagree - if the right player becomes available Celtic would spend £9/£10M. Do agree though that we wouldn’t buy two at that money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree asking for 2 at £10M is a bit far fetched but its not unreasonable to expect Celtic to pay £10M if the right player became available.Lets face it if we want to keep FF and Ely then they are going to cost at least that each!!
Just think that NOW was the time to make a statement of intent to the fans but then PL has never really been one for doing that.As i have said before i still think we have by far a stronger squad than Rangers and should still be able to win this title but the right signings at this time would have really sent a message .Lets face it whats the point of having a huge financial advantage and NOT using it?

posted on 18/1/20

comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 47 seconds ago
Would you seriously put McGinn on same level as a CL winner. ๐Ÿ˜‚
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That wasn't the point you were attempting (badly) to make though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t argue with logic like that๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Go on - give us a 'Slippy' or a 'Sevco' - might make you feel better.

comment by IfUNo (U4755)

posted on 18/1/20

comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Zachsda(Proudly sat with the sheriff) (U1850)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 1 minute ago
Would you seriously put McGinn on same level as a CL winner. ๐Ÿ˜‚
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Relaxdays-Unisex-Lightweight-Camping-Approx/dp/B07PWGDTBV
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah bless it’s a bear love-in

posted on 18/1/20

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 18/1/20

comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Zachsda(Proudly sat with the sheriff) (U1850)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 1 minute ago
Would you seriously put McGinn on same level as a CL winner. ๐Ÿ˜‚
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Relaxdays-Unisex-Lightweight-Camping-Approx/dp/B07PWGDTBV
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah bless it’s a bear love-in
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Or just laughing at an idiot.

posted on 18/1/20

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 18/1/20

I still don't believe Celtic winning the Title is a foregone conclusion, Rangers are much better than recent seasons and Celtic fans thinking otherwise are mental.

posted on 18/1/20

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 18/1/20

comment by ritchiebhoy (U10107)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
DC is right.

No way are Celtic going to splash out £20m on fees and pay the wages that such a player would command.

I’d be stunned if we even bought another £9m player again in the foreseeable unless it was after we had had them on loan and effectively had guaranteed a performance level as Edouard did. We didn’t just go out and pay £9m for someone we’d merely had scouted. He had been with us for some time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disagree - if the right player becomes available Celtic would spend £9/£10M. Do agree though that we wouldn’t buy two at that money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree asking for 2 at £10M is a bit far fetched but its not unreasonable to expect Celtic to pay £10M if the right player became available.Lets face it if we want to keep FF and Ely then they are going to cost at least that each!!
Just think that NOW was the time to make a statement of intent to the fans but then PL has never really been one for doing that.As i have said before i still think we have by far a stronger squad than Rangers and should still be able to win this title but the right signings at this time would have really sent a message .Lets face it whats the point of having a huge financial advantage and NOT using it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why blow £10m on a player to possibly win the League? Yes of course there is the potential for a good return via CL money - but that is it - just potential. You buy a £10m player and he has to be right at it from the get go - there are only 5 months left of the season. Big gamble and one that Celtic will not take.

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 18/1/20

https://www.spotrac.com/epl/liverpool-f.c/payroll/

comment by IfUNo (U4755)

posted on 18/1/20

comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Zachsda(Proudly sat with the sheriff) (U1850)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 1 minute ago
Would you seriously put McGinn on same level as a CL winner. ๐Ÿ˜‚
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Relaxdays-Unisex-Lightweight-Camping-Approx/dp/B07PWGDTBV
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah bless it’s a bear love-in
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Or just laughing at an idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seriously DC - this from you ๐Ÿ˜‚

posted on 18/1/20

comment by Zicoโ™ก (U21900)
posted 30 seconds ago
I still don't believe Celtic winning the Title is a foregone conclusion, Rangers are much better than recent seasons and Celtic fans thinking otherwise are mental.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was the whole point of my post .I do think we are still the stronger squad but the fact that Rangers are now much better than the rest of the league means its going to be really tight and NOW was the time to use the financial advantage we have over them IMHO

posted on 18/1/20

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 18/1/20

comment by Zachsda(Proudly sat with the sheriff) (U1850)
posted 28 seconds ago
Why blow £10m on a player to possibly win the League? Yes of course there is the potential for a good return via CL money - but that is it - just potential. You buy a £10m player and he has to be right at it from the get go - there are only 5 months left of the season. Big gamble and one that Celtic will not take.

Madness to do so
We are neck and neck
Celtic have signed 2 with potential
Possibly more to come in
I’d hoped we’d bring in a striker on loan
Still not given up hope
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I would like another forward in, too. Fairly covered in every other position except up top.

comment by IfUNo (U4755)

posted on 18/1/20

comment by ritchiebhoy (U10107)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Zicoโ™ก (U21900)
posted 30 seconds ago
I still don't believe Celtic winning the Title is a foregone conclusion, Rangers are much better than recent seasons and Celtic fans thinking otherwise are mental.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was the whole point of my post.I do think we are still the stronger squad but the fact that Rangers are now much better than the rest of the league means its going to be really tight and NOW was the time to use the financial advantage we have over them IMHO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on. We could still spend a significant amount on one player before end of Jan. would be a massive statement from the club.

posted on 18/1/20

comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ritchiebhoy (U10107)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
DC is right.

No way are Celtic going to splash out £20m on fees and pay the wages that such a player would command.

I’d be stunned if we even bought another £9m player again in the foreseeable unless it was after we had had them on loan and effectively had guaranteed a performance level as Edouard did. We didn’t just go out and pay £9m for someone we’d merely had scouted. He had been with us for some time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disagree - if the right player becomes available Celtic would spend £9/£10M. Do agree though that we wouldn’t buy two at that money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree asking for 2 at £10M is a bit far fetched but its not unreasonable to expect Celtic to pay £10M if the right player became available.Lets face it if we want to keep FF and Ely then they are going to cost at least that each!!
Just think that NOW was the time to make a statement of intent to the fans but then PL has never really been one for doing that.As i have said before i still think we have by far a stronger squad than Rangers and should still be able to win this title but the right signings at this time would have really sent a message .Lets face it whats the point of having a huge financial advantage and NOT using it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why blow £10m on a player to possibly win the League? Yes of course there is the potential for a good return via CL money - but that is it - just potential. You buy a £10m player and he has to be right at it from the get go - there are only 5 months left of the season. Big gamble and one that Celtic will not take.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if you have a financial advantage then dont bother using it in case it doesnt work out?? If that was the case then no cant would buy anyone and the transfer market would cease to exist

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 18/1/20

As soon as you start buying players for the short-term the game is up. However, for Celtic (or Rangers), it is no bigger risk buying now to potentially get into the CL qualifiers as it is buying in August in the middle of those biggest ties of the season that decide that achievement?

posted on 18/1/20

comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by ritchiebhoy (U10107)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Zicoโ™ก (U21900)
posted 30 seconds ago
I still don't believe Celtic winning the Title is a foregone conclusion, Rangers are much better than recent seasons and Celtic fans thinking otherwise are mental.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was the whole point of my post.I do think we are still the stronger squad but the fact that Rangers are now much better than the rest of the league means its going to be really tight and NOW was the time to use the financial advantage we have over them IMHO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on. We could still spend a significant amount on one player before end of Jan. would be a massive statement from the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
exactly

posted on 18/1/20

comment by ritchiebhoy (U10107)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ritchiebhoy (U10107)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
DC is right.

No way are Celtic going to splash out £20m on fees and pay the wages that such a player would command.

I’d be stunned if we even bought another £9m player again in the foreseeable unless it was after we had had them on loan and effectively had guaranteed a performance level as Edouard did. We didn’t just go out and pay £9m for someone we’d merely had scouted. He had been with us for some time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disagree - if the right player becomes available Celtic would spend £9/£10M. Do agree though that we wouldn’t buy two at that money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree asking for 2 at £10M is a bit far fetched but its not unreasonable to expect Celtic to pay £10M if the right player became available.Lets face it if we want to keep FF and Ely then they are going to cost at least that each!!
Just think that NOW was the time to make a statement of intent to the fans but then PL has never really been one for doing that.As i have said before i still think we have by far a stronger squad than Rangers and should still be able to win this title but the right signings at this time would have really sent a message .Lets face it whats the point of having a huge financial advantage and NOT using it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why blow £10m on a player to possibly win the League? Yes of course there is the potential for a good return via CL money - but that is it - just potential. You buy a £10m player and he has to be right at it from the get go - there are only 5 months left of the season. Big gamble and one that Celtic will not take.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if you have a financial advantage then dont bother using it in case it doesnt work out?? If that was the case then no cant would buy anyone and the transfer market would cease to exist
----------------------------------------------------------------------

By all means go for it. Go get a £10m player and then pay out the same again on wages to win the league.

I hope you do blow such coin TBH.

posted on 18/1/20

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 32 seconds ago
As soon as you start buying players for the short-term the game is up. However, for Celtic (or Rangers), it is no bigger risk buying now to potentially get into the CL qualifiers as it is buying in August in the middle of those biggest ties of the season that decide that achievement?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We DO buy players (projects ) for the short term though ALL of our squad is for sale at the right price.

posted on 18/1/20

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 18/1/20

comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ritchiebhoy (U10107)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ritchiebhoy (U10107)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
DC is right.

No way are Celtic going to splash out £20m on fees and pay the wages that such a player would command.

I’d be stunned if we even bought another £9m player again in the foreseeable unless it was after we had had them on loan and effectively had guaranteed a performance level as Edouard did. We didn’t just go out and pay £9m for someone we’d merely had scouted. He had been with us for some time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disagree - if the right player becomes available Celtic would spend £9/£10M. Do agree though that we wouldn’t buy two at that money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree asking for 2 at £10M is a bit far fetched but its not unreasonable to expect Celtic to pay £10M if the right player became available.Lets face it if we want to keep FF and Ely then they are going to cost at least that each!!
Just think that NOW was the time to make a statement of intent to the fans but then PL has never really been one for doing that.As i have said before i still think we have by far a stronger squad than Rangers and should still be able to win this title but the right signings at this time would have really sent a message .Lets face it whats the point of having a huge financial advantage and NOT using it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why blow £10m on a player to possibly win the League? Yes of course there is the potential for a good return via CL money - but that is it - just potential. You buy a £10m player and he has to be right at it from the get go - there are only 5 months left of the season. Big gamble and one that Celtic will not take.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if you have a financial advantage then dont bother using it in case it doesnt work out?? If that was the case then no cant would buy anyone and the transfer market would cease to exist
----------------------------------------------------------------------

By all means go for it. Go get a £10m player and then pay out the same again on wages to win the league.

I hope you do blow such coin TBH.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Huge Difference is You're lot have recently blown £7M on kent or at least got him on tick! which is money you DONT have ,whereas we DO have money in the bank

posted on 18/1/20

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 18/1/20

comment by Zachsda(Proudly sat with the sheriff) (U1850)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by ritchiebhoy (U10107)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ritchiebhoy (U10107)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
DC is right.

No way are Celtic going to splash out £20m on fees and pay the wages that such a player would command.

I’d be stunned if we even bought another £9m player again in the foreseeable unless it was after we had had them on loan and effectively had guaranteed a performance level as Edouard did. We didn’t just go out and pay £9m for someone we’d merely had scouted. He had been with us for some time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disagree - if the right player becomes available Celtic would spend £9/£10M. Do agree though that we wouldn’t buy two at that money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree asking for 2 at £10M is a bit far fetched but its not unreasonable to expect Celtic to pay £10M if the right player became available.Lets face it if we want to keep FF and Ely then they are going to cost at least that each!!
Just think that NOW was the time to make a statement of intent to the fans but then PL has never really been one for doing that.As i have said before i still think we have by far a stronger squad than Rangers and should still be able to win this title but the right signings at this time would have really sent a message .Lets face it whats the point of having a huge financial advantage and NOT using it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why blow £10m on a player to possibly win the League? Yes of course there is the potential for a good return via CL money - but that is it - just potential. You buy a £10m player and he has to be right at it from the get go - there are only 5 months left of the season. Big gamble and one that Celtic will not take.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if you have a financial advantage then dont bother using it in case it doesnt work out?? If that was the case then no cant would buy anyone and the transfer market would cease to exist
----------------------------------------------------------------------

By all means go for it. Go get a £10m player and then pay out the same again on wages to win the league.

I hope you do blow such coin TBH.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They will not spend that this window it’d be fiscal madness
Celtic tend not to do that
May buy the odd dud like most dudes but they’re no daft
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There does seem to be an element of 'panic' buying by Lennon TBF. Has seen his team schooled in the last 2 OF games (yes they won the Final) and is shall we say, a bit perturbed to say the least.

posted on 18/1/20

comment by ritchiebhoy (U10107)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ritchiebhoy (U10107)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by DC1972 (U22266)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ritchiebhoy (U10107)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
DC is right.

No way are Celtic going to splash out £20m on fees and pay the wages that such a player would command.

I’d be stunned if we even bought another £9m player again in the foreseeable unless it was after we had had them on loan and effectively had guaranteed a performance level as Edouard did. We didn’t just go out and pay £9m for someone we’d merely had scouted. He had been with us for some time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disagree - if the right player becomes available Celtic would spend £9/£10M. Do agree though that we wouldn’t buy two at that money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree asking for 2 at £10M is a bit far fetched but its not unreasonable to expect Celtic to pay £10M if the right player became available.Lets face it if we want to keep FF and Ely then they are going to cost at least that each!!
Just think that NOW was the time to make a statement of intent to the fans but then PL has never really been one for doing that.As i have said before i still think we have by far a stronger squad than Rangers and should still be able to win this title but the right signings at this time would have really sent a message .Lets face it whats the point of having a huge financial advantage and NOT using it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why blow £10m on a player to possibly win the League? Yes of course there is the potential for a good return via CL money - but that is it - just potential. You buy a £10m player and he has to be right at it from the get go - there are only 5 months left of the season. Big gamble and one that Celtic will not take.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if you have a financial advantage then dont bother using it in case it doesnt work out?? If that was the case then no cant would buy anyone and the transfer market would cease to exist
----------------------------------------------------------------------

By all means go for it. Go get a £10m player and then pay out the same again on wages to win the league.

I hope you do blow such coin TBH.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Huge Difference is You're lot have recently blown £7M on kent or at least got him on tick! which is money you DONT have ,whereas we DO have money in the bank
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't mind us 'blowing' £7m on Kent. I think he is a great wee player and was noticeably absent last night.

Potentially has a good sell-on value if it comes to that. As ever - we will see how things pan out.

Page 2 of 5

Sign in if you want to comment