comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
So, GT and Robbing have both now set about making unprovoked, off topic comments about me.
But that is my fault.
You can't make this stuff up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. You're in the clear Winston, you always are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every time you say this and every time I remind you that I've openly admitted that sometimes I am in the wrong.
It doesn't fit with your narrative of course, which is why you keep peddling the myth.
Fact is, yet again you've joined the article and just come straight at me with off topic comments. I never do that to you.
It's always you who instigates these exchanges.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. You do tell me you admit that you're wrong, never giving examples of course but you tell me that you're in the wrong. It's fine Winston, like I said, just keep to the topic and it'll be fine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've told you that because it's the truth.
Unlike you, who never stops and says 'yes, it is me who has caused this exchange and I'll stop doing it so that threads don't get derailed'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok Winston.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not okay, unless you actually stop doing it.
comment by Nostraduncus (U11713)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Robb Fernandes (U22311)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fvcking the captains wife is quite a butterfly!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was probably more gentle with her than Chapman was
----------------------------------------------------------------------
chapman was never the captain
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was he not? Story is better if he was.
She's in a right mess now. Ended up in a wheel chair I think.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
No, you took exception to the use of 'record fee' and were being facetious when you talked about how you could apply that to any niche category.
The 'record fee' part is semantics and unimportant.
The point was always that Klopp implied he wouldn't spend big sums on individual players and then changed his mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say anything on Klopp. My comment was to point out we hadn't changed our approach. As I said above and as is shown in my comments. If you want to discuss Klopp's comments, that's a separate discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were mocking the discussion about record fees and I was saying that is entirely about the Klopp comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was showing that we didnt pay world record fees. Which we didn't.
comment by Robb Fernandes (U22311)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 46 seconds ago
Robb fvck this cvnt off. All he ever does is talk about what other people have said or written. 90% of the time is not actually about football and it's boring.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really need to grow up, Robbing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please just walk away dude - is this argument even fun for you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Walk away from what?
I'm discussing Liverpool's spending and both GT and Robbing have hijacked it with personal comments.
Sorry it's ruining the article but they're the cause, not me. I am trying to stay on the subject i.e. football.
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Nostraduncus (U11713)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Robb Fernandes (U22311)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fvcking the captains wife is quite a butterfly!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was probably more gentle with her than Chapman was
----------------------------------------------------------------------
chapman was never the captain
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was he not? Story is better if he was.
She's in a right mess now. Ended up in a wheel chair I think.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
think strachan was captain at the time.
she used to be a tidy bit of tackle... why do people do that to themselves
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
No, you took exception to the use of 'record fee' and were being facetious when you talked about how you could apply that to any niche category.
The 'record fee' part is semantics and unimportant.
The point was always that Klopp implied he wouldn't spend big sums on individual players and then changed his mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say anything on Klopp. My comment was to point out we hadn't changed our approach. As I said above and as is shown in my comments. If you want to discuss Klopp's comments, that's a separate discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were mocking the discussion about record fees and I was saying that is entirely about the Klopp comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was showing that we didnt pay world record fees. Which we didn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, you knew he didn't mean that - it's semantics.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
No, you took exception to the use of 'record fee' and were being facetious when you talked about how you could apply that to any niche category.
The 'record fee' part is semantics and unimportant.
The point was always that Klopp implied he wouldn't spend big sums on individual players and then changed his mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say anything on Klopp. My comment was to point out we hadn't changed our approach. As I said above and as is shown in my comments. If you want to discuss Klopp's comments, that's a separate discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were mocking the discussion about record fees and I was saying that is entirely about the Klopp comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was showing that we didnt pay world record fees. Which we didn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, you knew he didn't mean that - it's semantics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, I didn't. There are many who peddle this myth and judging from his previous I wouldn't be surprised if he was one of them.
comment by Nostraduncus (U11713)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Nostraduncus (U11713)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Robb Fernandes (U22311)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fvcking the captains wife is quite a butterfly!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was probably more gentle with her than Chapman was
----------------------------------------------------------------------
chapman was never the captain
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was he not? Story is better if he was.
She's in a right mess now. Ended up in a wheel chair I think.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
think strachan was captain at the time.
she used to be a tidy bit of tackle... why do people do that to themselves
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember Men Behaving Badly?
Great little sitcom
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 second ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
If I'm interpreting what he said incorrectly, why did he say this:
"It’s only an opinion in that moment. Did I change my opinion? Yes. That’s true. It’s better to change an opinion than to never have one."
Perhaps you're the one misinterpreting what he said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name the player Klopp spent £100m on?
Name a team we’ve outspent?
Name the collection of top players Klopp has hoovered up from Europe’s top teams?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one said he spent £100m.
No one said he outspent a team.
No one said he hoovered up top players.
I said he implied that he wouldn't spend big money on top players i.e. individuals and he changed his mind.
Clearly he agrees with that interpretation.
It is laughable that you want to argue this when Klopp himself admitted it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if he hasn’t done any of the above, spent
£100m on a player etc, where has he contradicted himself?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many times do you need this explained?
He implied that he wouldn't spend big money on individuals. He then did just that.
Then, when asked, he admitted that he had changed his opinion on the subject.
Let me know which part you don't understand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Define "big" money. If I define big money as over £100 million then he hasn't ever spent big money on a player.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
No, you took exception to the use of 'record fee' and were being facetious when you talked about how you could apply that to any niche category.
The 'record fee' part is semantics and unimportant.
The point was always that Klopp implied he wouldn't spend big sums on individual players and then changed his mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say anything on Klopp. My comment was to point out we hadn't changed our approach. As I said above and as is shown in my comments. If you want to discuss Klopp's comments, that's a separate discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were mocking the discussion about record fees and I was saying that is entirely about the Klopp comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was showing that we didnt pay world record fees. Which we didn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, you knew he didn't mean that - it's semantics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was implied
comment by Nostraduncus (U11713)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Nostraduncus (U11713)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Robb Fernandes (U22311)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fvcking the captains wife is quite a butterfly!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was probably more gentle with her than Chapman was
----------------------------------------------------------------------
chapman was never the captain
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was he not? Story is better if he was.
She's in a right mess now. Ended up in a wheel chair I think.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
think strachan was captain at the time.
she used to be a tidy bit of tackle... why do people do that to themselves
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah she nearly died. It's super glue in the ass I don't get. That British woman got deported for doing it her cellar and killing someone.
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
So, GT and Robbing have both now set about making unprovoked, off topic comments about me.
But that is my fault.
You can't make this stuff up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. You're in the clear Winston, you always are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every time you say this and every time I remind you that I've openly admitted that sometimes I am in the wrong.
It doesn't fit with your narrative of course, which is why you keep peddling the myth.
Fact is, yet again you've joined the article and just come straight at me with off topic comments. I never do that to you.
It's always you who instigates these exchanges.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. You do tell me you admit that you're wrong, never giving examples of course but you tell me that you're in the wrong. It's fine Winston, like I said, just keep to the topic and it'll be fine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've told you that because it's the truth.
Unlike you, who never stops and says 'yes, it is me who has caused this exchange and I'll stop doing it so that threads don't get derailed'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok Winston.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not okay, unless you actually stop doing it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bye.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 second ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
If I'm interpreting what he said incorrectly, why did he say this:
"It’s only an opinion in that moment. Did I change my opinion? Yes. That’s true. It’s better to change an opinion than to never have one."
Perhaps you're the one misinterpreting what he said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name the player Klopp spent £100m on?
Name a team we’ve outspent?
Name the collection of top players Klopp has hoovered up from Europe’s top teams?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one said he spent £100m.
No one said he outspent a team.
No one said he hoovered up top players.
I said he implied that he wouldn't spend big money on top players i.e. individuals and he changed his mind.
Clearly he agrees with that interpretation.
It is laughable that you want to argue this when Klopp himself admitted it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if he hasn’t done any of the above, spent
£100m on a player etc, where has he contradicted himself?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many times do you need this explained?
He implied that he wouldn't spend big money on individuals. He then did just that.
Then, when asked, he admitted that he had changed his opinion on the subject.
Let me know which part you don't understand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Define "big" money. If I define big money as over £100 million then he hasn't ever spent big money on a player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's subjective.
But Klopp said he changed his opinion, so clearly the money he spent on Allisson and VVD would be regarded as big money to him.
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
So, GT and Robbing have both now set about making unprovoked, off topic comments about me.
But that is my fault.
You can't make this stuff up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. You're in the clear Winston, you always are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every time you say this and every time I remind you that I've openly admitted that sometimes I am in the wrong.
It doesn't fit with your narrative of course, which is why you keep peddling the myth.
Fact is, yet again you've joined the article and just come straight at me with off topic comments. I never do that to you.
It's always you who instigates these exchanges.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. You do tell me you admit that you're wrong, never giving examples of course but you tell me that you're in the wrong. It's fine Winston, like I said, just keep to the topic and it'll be fine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've told you that because it's the truth.
Unlike you, who never stops and says 'yes, it is me who has caused this exchange and I'll stop doing it so that threads don't get derailed'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok Winston.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not okay, unless you actually stop doing it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bye.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You off?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I'm assuming you're done replying to this off topic exchange that you started and is ruining the thread.
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
No, you took exception to the use of 'record fee' and were being facetious when you talked about how you could apply that to any niche category.
The 'record fee' part is semantics and unimportant.
The point was always that Klopp implied he wouldn't spend big sums on individual players and then changed his mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say anything on Klopp. My comment was to point out we hadn't changed our approach. As I said above and as is shown in my comments. If you want to discuss Klopp's comments, that's a separate discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were mocking the discussion about record fees and I was saying that is entirely about the Klopp comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was showing that we didnt pay world record fees. Which we didn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, you knew he didn't mean that - it's semantics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, I didn't. There are many who peddle this myth and judging from his previous I wouldn't be surprised if he was one of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you didn't realise what he meant then you need to step back and think things through a little before posting imo.
You act like you're helpless in this situation Winston, which is probably true tbf.
Winston
It’s you coming up with the term ‘big money’ to add ambiguity to Klopp’s quote. He was quite specific about £100m for one player.
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 41 seconds ago
You act like you're helpless in this situation Winston, which is probably true tbf.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many off topic, personal comments are you going to make today?
All my fault, I assume?
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
No, you took exception to the use of 'record fee' and were being facetious when you talked about how you could apply that to any niche category.
The 'record fee' part is semantics and unimportant.
The point was always that Klopp implied he wouldn't spend big sums on individual players and then changed his mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say anything on Klopp. My comment was to point out we hadn't changed our approach. As I said above and as is shown in my comments. If you want to discuss Klopp's comments, that's a separate discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were mocking the discussion about record fees and I was saying that is entirely about the Klopp comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was showing that we didnt pay world record fees. Which we didn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, you knew he didn't mean that - it's semantics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, I didn't. There are many who peddle this myth and judging from his previous I wouldn't be surprised if he was one of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you didn't realise what he meant then you need to step back and think things through a little before posting imo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I don't. I need to consider the amount of people who peddle this myth and whether the person making the comment could be one of them. With his previous I considered it and felt he could be. I therefore responded to what he said, rather than what you think he said.
Winston please move to Not606
Sincerely Everyone.
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 9 seconds ago
Winston please move to Not606
Sincerely Everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seconded
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 40 seconds ago
Winston
It’s you coming up with the term ‘big money’ to add ambiguity to Klopp’s quote. He was quite specific about £100m for one player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he wasn't, actually - you're twisting his words.
He said this:
""If you bring one player in for £100m and he gets injured, then it all goes through the chimney," he said."
He was clearly just plucking a figure out of the air.
Later, he said this:
"Other clubs can go out and spend more money and collect top players. I want to do it differently. I would even do it differently if I could spend that money."
Fair point about 'big money' and I'll stop saying that.
But clearly he has gone out and bought 'top players' in a policy that goes against the principle he's talking about in his quote.
If he hadn't have acknowledged it himself then you may have a case, but seeing as he has done so, why are you trying to argue that he meant something else?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 9 seconds ago
Winston please move to Not606
Sincerely Everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seconded
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah yes, let's all blame Winston.
Sign in if you want to comment
Van Dijk to City?
Page 7 of 14
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
posted on 22/1/20
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
So, GT and Robbing have both now set about making unprovoked, off topic comments about me.
But that is my fault.
You can't make this stuff up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. You're in the clear Winston, you always are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every time you say this and every time I remind you that I've openly admitted that sometimes I am in the wrong.
It doesn't fit with your narrative of course, which is why you keep peddling the myth.
Fact is, yet again you've joined the article and just come straight at me with off topic comments. I never do that to you.
It's always you who instigates these exchanges.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. You do tell me you admit that you're wrong, never giving examples of course but you tell me that you're in the wrong. It's fine Winston, like I said, just keep to the topic and it'll be fine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've told you that because it's the truth.
Unlike you, who never stops and says 'yes, it is me who has caused this exchange and I'll stop doing it so that threads don't get derailed'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok Winston.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not okay, unless you actually stop doing it.
posted on 22/1/20
comment by Nostraduncus (U11713)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Robb Fernandes (U22311)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fvcking the captains wife is quite a butterfly!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was probably more gentle with her than Chapman was
----------------------------------------------------------------------
chapman was never the captain
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was he not? Story is better if he was.
She's in a right mess now. Ended up in a wheel chair I think.
posted on 22/1/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
No, you took exception to the use of 'record fee' and were being facetious when you talked about how you could apply that to any niche category.
The 'record fee' part is semantics and unimportant.
The point was always that Klopp implied he wouldn't spend big sums on individual players and then changed his mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say anything on Klopp. My comment was to point out we hadn't changed our approach. As I said above and as is shown in my comments. If you want to discuss Klopp's comments, that's a separate discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were mocking the discussion about record fees and I was saying that is entirely about the Klopp comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was showing that we didnt pay world record fees. Which we didn't.
posted on 22/1/20
comment by Robb Fernandes (U22311)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 46 seconds ago
Robb fvck this cvnt off. All he ever does is talk about what other people have said or written. 90% of the time is not actually about football and it's boring.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really need to grow up, Robbing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please just walk away dude - is this argument even fun for you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Walk away from what?
I'm discussing Liverpool's spending and both GT and Robbing have hijacked it with personal comments.
Sorry it's ruining the article but they're the cause, not me. I am trying to stay on the subject i.e. football.
posted on 22/1/20
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Nostraduncus (U11713)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Robb Fernandes (U22311)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fvcking the captains wife is quite a butterfly!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was probably more gentle with her than Chapman was
----------------------------------------------------------------------
chapman was never the captain
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was he not? Story is better if he was.
She's in a right mess now. Ended up in a wheel chair I think.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
think strachan was captain at the time.
she used to be a tidy bit of tackle... why do people do that to themselves
posted on 22/1/20
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
No, you took exception to the use of 'record fee' and were being facetious when you talked about how you could apply that to any niche category.
The 'record fee' part is semantics and unimportant.
The point was always that Klopp implied he wouldn't spend big sums on individual players and then changed his mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say anything on Klopp. My comment was to point out we hadn't changed our approach. As I said above and as is shown in my comments. If you want to discuss Klopp's comments, that's a separate discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were mocking the discussion about record fees and I was saying that is entirely about the Klopp comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was showing that we didnt pay world record fees. Which we didn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, you knew he didn't mean that - it's semantics.
posted on 22/1/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 22/1/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
No, you took exception to the use of 'record fee' and were being facetious when you talked about how you could apply that to any niche category.
The 'record fee' part is semantics and unimportant.
The point was always that Klopp implied he wouldn't spend big sums on individual players and then changed his mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say anything on Klopp. My comment was to point out we hadn't changed our approach. As I said above and as is shown in my comments. If you want to discuss Klopp's comments, that's a separate discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were mocking the discussion about record fees and I was saying that is entirely about the Klopp comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was showing that we didnt pay world record fees. Which we didn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, you knew he didn't mean that - it's semantics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, I didn't. There are many who peddle this myth and judging from his previous I wouldn't be surprised if he was one of them.
posted on 22/1/20
comment by Nostraduncus (U11713)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Nostraduncus (U11713)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Robb Fernandes (U22311)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fvcking the captains wife is quite a butterfly!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was probably more gentle with her than Chapman was
----------------------------------------------------------------------
chapman was never the captain
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was he not? Story is better if he was.
She's in a right mess now. Ended up in a wheel chair I think.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
think strachan was captain at the time.
she used to be a tidy bit of tackle... why do people do that to themselves
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember Men Behaving Badly?
Great little sitcom
posted on 22/1/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 second ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
If I'm interpreting what he said incorrectly, why did he say this:
"It’s only an opinion in that moment. Did I change my opinion? Yes. That’s true. It’s better to change an opinion than to never have one."
Perhaps you're the one misinterpreting what he said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name the player Klopp spent £100m on?
Name a team we’ve outspent?
Name the collection of top players Klopp has hoovered up from Europe’s top teams?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one said he spent £100m.
No one said he outspent a team.
No one said he hoovered up top players.
I said he implied that he wouldn't spend big money on top players i.e. individuals and he changed his mind.
Clearly he agrees with that interpretation.
It is laughable that you want to argue this when Klopp himself admitted it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if he hasn’t done any of the above, spent
£100m on a player etc, where has he contradicted himself?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many times do you need this explained?
He implied that he wouldn't spend big money on individuals. He then did just that.
Then, when asked, he admitted that he had changed his opinion on the subject.
Let me know which part you don't understand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Define "big" money. If I define big money as over £100 million then he hasn't ever spent big money on a player.
posted on 22/1/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
No, you took exception to the use of 'record fee' and were being facetious when you talked about how you could apply that to any niche category.
The 'record fee' part is semantics and unimportant.
The point was always that Klopp implied he wouldn't spend big sums on individual players and then changed his mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say anything on Klopp. My comment was to point out we hadn't changed our approach. As I said above and as is shown in my comments. If you want to discuss Klopp's comments, that's a separate discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were mocking the discussion about record fees and I was saying that is entirely about the Klopp comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was showing that we didnt pay world record fees. Which we didn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, you knew he didn't mean that - it's semantics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was implied
posted on 22/1/20
comment by Nostraduncus (U11713)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Nostraduncus (U11713)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Robb Fernandes (U22311)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Fvcking the captains wife is quite a butterfly!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was probably more gentle with her than Chapman was
----------------------------------------------------------------------
chapman was never the captain
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was he not? Story is better if he was.
She's in a right mess now. Ended up in a wheel chair I think.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
think strachan was captain at the time.
she used to be a tidy bit of tackle... why do people do that to themselves
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah she nearly died. It's super glue in the ass I don't get. That British woman got deported for doing it her cellar and killing someone.
posted on 22/1/20
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
So, GT and Robbing have both now set about making unprovoked, off topic comments about me.
But that is my fault.
You can't make this stuff up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. You're in the clear Winston, you always are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every time you say this and every time I remind you that I've openly admitted that sometimes I am in the wrong.
It doesn't fit with your narrative of course, which is why you keep peddling the myth.
Fact is, yet again you've joined the article and just come straight at me with off topic comments. I never do that to you.
It's always you who instigates these exchanges.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. You do tell me you admit that you're wrong, never giving examples of course but you tell me that you're in the wrong. It's fine Winston, like I said, just keep to the topic and it'll be fine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've told you that because it's the truth.
Unlike you, who never stops and says 'yes, it is me who has caused this exchange and I'll stop doing it so that threads don't get derailed'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok Winston.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not okay, unless you actually stop doing it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bye.
posted on 22/1/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 22/1/20
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 second ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
If I'm interpreting what he said incorrectly, why did he say this:
"It’s only an opinion in that moment. Did I change my opinion? Yes. That’s true. It’s better to change an opinion than to never have one."
Perhaps you're the one misinterpreting what he said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name the player Klopp spent £100m on?
Name a team we’ve outspent?
Name the collection of top players Klopp has hoovered up from Europe’s top teams?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one said he spent £100m.
No one said he outspent a team.
No one said he hoovered up top players.
I said he implied that he wouldn't spend big money on top players i.e. individuals and he changed his mind.
Clearly he agrees with that interpretation.
It is laughable that you want to argue this when Klopp himself admitted it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if he hasn’t done any of the above, spent
£100m on a player etc, where has he contradicted himself?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many times do you need this explained?
He implied that he wouldn't spend big money on individuals. He then did just that.
Then, when asked, he admitted that he had changed his opinion on the subject.
Let me know which part you don't understand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Define "big" money. If I define big money as over £100 million then he hasn't ever spent big money on a player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's subjective.
But Klopp said he changed his opinion, so clearly the money he spent on Allisson and VVD would be regarded as big money to him.
posted on 22/1/20
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
So, GT and Robbing have both now set about making unprovoked, off topic comments about me.
But that is my fault.
You can't make this stuff up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. You're in the clear Winston, you always are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every time you say this and every time I remind you that I've openly admitted that sometimes I am in the wrong.
It doesn't fit with your narrative of course, which is why you keep peddling the myth.
Fact is, yet again you've joined the article and just come straight at me with off topic comments. I never do that to you.
It's always you who instigates these exchanges.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. You do tell me you admit that you're wrong, never giving examples of course but you tell me that you're in the wrong. It's fine Winston, like I said, just keep to the topic and it'll be fine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've told you that because it's the truth.
Unlike you, who never stops and says 'yes, it is me who has caused this exchange and I'll stop doing it so that threads don't get derailed'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok Winston.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not okay, unless you actually stop doing it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bye.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You off?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I'm assuming you're done replying to this off topic exchange that you started and is ruining the thread.
posted on 22/1/20
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
No, you took exception to the use of 'record fee' and were being facetious when you talked about how you could apply that to any niche category.
The 'record fee' part is semantics and unimportant.
The point was always that Klopp implied he wouldn't spend big sums on individual players and then changed his mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say anything on Klopp. My comment was to point out we hadn't changed our approach. As I said above and as is shown in my comments. If you want to discuss Klopp's comments, that's a separate discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were mocking the discussion about record fees and I was saying that is entirely about the Klopp comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was showing that we didnt pay world record fees. Which we didn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, you knew he didn't mean that - it's semantics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, I didn't. There are many who peddle this myth and judging from his previous I wouldn't be surprised if he was one of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you didn't realise what he meant then you need to step back and think things through a little before posting imo.
posted on 22/1/20
You act like you're helpless in this situation Winston, which is probably true tbf.
posted on 22/1/20
Winston
It’s you coming up with the term ‘big money’ to add ambiguity to Klopp’s quote. He was quite specific about £100m for one player.
posted on 22/1/20
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 41 seconds ago
You act like you're helpless in this situation Winston, which is probably true tbf.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many off topic, personal comments are you going to make today?
All my fault, I assume?
posted on 22/1/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
No, you took exception to the use of 'record fee' and were being facetious when you talked about how you could apply that to any niche category.
The 'record fee' part is semantics and unimportant.
The point was always that Klopp implied he wouldn't spend big sums on individual players and then changed his mind.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say anything on Klopp. My comment was to point out we hadn't changed our approach. As I said above and as is shown in my comments. If you want to discuss Klopp's comments, that's a separate discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were mocking the discussion about record fees and I was saying that is entirely about the Klopp comments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was showing that we didnt pay world record fees. Which we didn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, you knew he didn't mean that - it's semantics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And as I said at the time, I didn't. There are many who peddle this myth and judging from his previous I wouldn't be surprised if he was one of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you didn't realise what he meant then you need to step back and think things through a little before posting imo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I don't. I need to consider the amount of people who peddle this myth and whether the person making the comment could be one of them. With his previous I considered it and felt he could be. I therefore responded to what he said, rather than what you think he said.
posted on 22/1/20
Winston please move to Not606
Sincerely Everyone.
posted on 22/1/20
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 9 seconds ago
Winston please move to Not606
Sincerely Everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seconded
posted on 22/1/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 40 seconds ago
Winston
It’s you coming up with the term ‘big money’ to add ambiguity to Klopp’s quote. He was quite specific about £100m for one player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he wasn't, actually - you're twisting his words.
He said this:
""If you bring one player in for £100m and he gets injured, then it all goes through the chimney," he said."
He was clearly just plucking a figure out of the air.
Later, he said this:
"Other clubs can go out and spend more money and collect top players. I want to do it differently. I would even do it differently if I could spend that money."
Fair point about 'big money' and I'll stop saying that.
But clearly he has gone out and bought 'top players' in a policy that goes against the principle he's talking about in his quote.
If he hadn't have acknowledged it himself then you may have a case, but seeing as he has done so, why are you trying to argue that he meant something else?
posted on 22/1/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 9 seconds ago
Winston please move to Not606
Sincerely Everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seconded
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah yes, let's all blame Winston.
Page 7 of 14
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12