comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
or whatever to steer the ship in the right direction.
———
Competent owners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well I think they are a bit naive rather than incompetent.

They've backed their managers maybe too much.

You can't tell me the club wanted players like matic, but they brought him for Jose.

I am certain they didn't want Maguire but backed Ole anyways.

Maybe a DoF would help, but i'd rather see Poch as I think he can actually build a team and get us some gems.

Still haven't lost faith in Ole though but he'll need to win Europa league to convince the board.

comment by Lurker - "We did it on derby day" (U21432)
posted 3 minutes ago
VC not getting on with someone

shocker
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It is well known that I don’t tolerate stupidity. Any there is plenty of it on view on nights like this.

No it’s definitely incompetence.

comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 4 minutes ago
No it’s definitely incompetence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disagree but whatever

Maybe a DoF would help, but i'd rather see Poch as I think he can actually build a team and get us some gems.

.....

But Poch would be stuck with dealing with Ed to get these gems.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
Maybe a DoF would help, but i'd rather see Poch as I think he can actually build a team and get us some gems.

.....

But Poch would be stuck with dealing with Ed to get these gems.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ed always overpays for players though, it’s the players you target that are the issue.

Poch has been better in the market so far than ole, although he did sign some duds himself as well.

I still don’t get the obsession by some with Poch, there are better more exciting options out there but it seems to be either ole or Poch for most of your board.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 6 hours, 56 minutes ago
comment by Lurker - "We did it on derby day" (U21432)
posted 3 minutes ago
VC not getting on with someone

shocker
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It is well known that I don’t tolerate stupidity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you live with yourself?

I thought Lurker was Heisenberg

comment by Yoda's big brother Hulk (U1250)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 6 hours, 56 minutes ago
comment by Lurker - "We did it on derby day" (U21432)
posted 3 minutes ago
VC not getting on with someone

shocker
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It is well known that I don’t tolerate stupidity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you live with yourself?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
👏👏👏

Utd's most successful period in our history was between 96 and 01.

So it appears you were in fact not correct.

comment by Yoda's big brother Hulk (U1250)
posted 3 hours, 54 minutes ago

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 6 hours, 56 minutes ago
comment by Lurker - "We did it on derby day" (U21432)
posted 3 minutes ago
VC not getting on with someone

shocker
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It is well known that I don’t tolerate stupidity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you live with yourself?

.....................

Not having your personality helps.

Utd's most successful period in our history was between 96 and 01.

So it appears you were in fact not correct.

...............

Only if you are prepared to ignore league cups and the Europey.

Well they wernt under that period under saf, so not relevant.

if you wann do a whole 15 year period, ok then 90 - 05 was our most successful period.

either way, you are wrong.

take your pick

ell they wernt under that period under saf, so not relevant.

.............

You gobbed off and were wrong. learn to count next time you dummy.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 54 minutes ago
ell they wernt under that period under saf, so not relevant.

.............

You gobbed off and were wrong. learn to count next time you dummy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually, I was entirely right

Prior to glazers (pl era)

premier league title wins 1992–93, 1993–94, 1995–96, 1996–97, 1998–99, 1999–2000, 2000–01, 2002–03 (8)


that covers an 12 year period where we won

Fa cup (1993–94, 1995–96, 1998–99, 2003–04) 4

European cups 99 (1)

Charity shield 4 1993, 1994, 1996, 1997, 2003,

interconintental cup 1 (99)


in the 15 years since 14 trophies


so less success in more time.

so yeah you are as usual completely wrong

I see you have moved the goalposts from 96 to 93

No United fan counts charity shields you fool.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 45 seconds ago
I see you have moved the goalposts from 96 to 93

No United fan counts charity shields you fool.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The 96 to 01 is the most success weve had in a five year period, as you wanted to use the entire glazer tenure then it made sense to give lengthen the time frame, and i still gave your nosnesne more years.

and fyi 6 of the trophies i count under the glazers were community shields so take those away and you have 8 in 15 years.

the same amount of pl trophies we won under SAF in the 12 years prior to their arrival.

So yeah, you are wrong.

Sorry takes it down to 10 in 15.

The 96 to 01 is the most success weve had in a five year period,

..............

I never mentioned a five year period.

You seem to be all over the place.

Maybe it is because you are an utter bed wetting buffoon.

Come back when you learn how to read.

Come back when you are actually right about the things you say

Most successful under the glazers clown

Come back when you are actually right about the things you say

.............

You failed to prove me wrong. You didn't even out up much of an effort.

You did goal post shift and tell loads of porkies though.

And proved we won more in the prior years than what we won after they arrived.

job done.

And proved we won more in the prior years than what we won after they arrived.

................

Only you didn't.

Would you like a calculator?

Because 14 is more than 10.

and thats only the 12 years before they arrived as oppose to the 15 years after