They are now level at the top with VAR decisions in their favour. Although that's not to say they weren't correct decisions.
Well, well, well another correct decision.
Strange article from a Spurs fan after another VAR error went in your favour yesterday.
Their 10th penalty of the PL season so far, and they`ve conceded just 1.
Spurs have been given just 2, and conceded 6.
The only 2 teams not to concede a penalty this season in the PL are Liverpool and Newcastle.
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 11 minutes ago
They are now level at the top with VAR decisions in their favour. Although that's not to say they weren't correct decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs are probably above us in the VAR decisions. Do t tell the Bacofoil boys that though as it doesn’t fit their paranoid narrative
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● (U3924)
posted 4 minutes ago
Their 10th penalty of the PL season so far, and they`ve conceded just 1.
Spurs have been given just 2, and conceded 6.
The only 2 teams not to concede a penalty this season in the PL are Liverpool and Newcastle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just saying that United have had 10 penalties doesn't really mean anything - are there any that shouldn't have been given? That is the more important question... Is anyone suggesting that today's pen shouldn't have been one?
Or are we just saying that United are clearly favoured by VAR because mostly the correct decisions have been given?
I disagree with the new rule about handball, but I don't think anyone can argue that it's VARs fault that it was disallowed - the rule is wrong.
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
Their 10th penalty of the PL season so far, and they`ve conceded just 1.
Spurs have been given just 2, and conceded 6.
The only 2 teams not to concede a penalty this season in the PL are Liverpool and Newcastle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair we've only conceded 15 goals and have averaged 62% possession, therefore it's only natural that we've conceded less penalties.
Correct decision.
Man played the ball with his arm, so hand ball.
comment by (U22329)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● (U3924)
posted 4 minutes ago
Their 10th penalty of the PL season so far, and they`ve conceded just 1.
Spurs have been given just 2, and conceded 6.
The only 2 teams not to concede a penalty this season in the PL are Liverpool and Newcastle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just saying that United have had 10 penalties doesn't really mean anything - are there any that shouldn't have been given? That is the more important question... Is anyone suggesting that today's pen shouldn't have been one?
Or are we just saying that United are clearly favoured by VAR because mostly the correct decisions have been given?
I disagree with the new rule about handball, but I don't think anyone can argue that it's VARs fault that it was disallowed - the rule is wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the one they got at Old Toilet against Spurs should not have been given for a start, Rashford felt his ankle grazed and dived a second later. In no way was he impeded from completing his action and the contact was miniscule.
Why is this on the spurs board? Should be only spurs fans posting articles about spurs
To be fair we've only conceded 15 goals and have averaged 62% possession, therefore it's only natural that we've conceded less penalties.
=========================================
Yes and even when Van Dyke scythes down an Everton player in the penalty area when clean through on goal, the officials ignore it, so there is little wonder you have not conceded one.
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● (U3924)
posted 28 seconds ago
To be fair we've only conceded 15 goals and have averaged 62% possession, therefore it's only natural that we've conceded less penalties.
=========================================
Yes and even when Van Dyke scythes down an Everton player in the penalty area when clean through on goal, the officials ignore it, so there is little wonder you have not conceded one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scythes down? Does that mean leans into him with his shoulder, using his strength and the player goes over as he was weaker? If so, then, you're correct.
The Rashford one was clearly a penalty, Sissokop stood on his foot.
You're just too biased to see anything that isn't a benefit to Spurs, as you've clearly demonstrated throughout your time on the site. Even your own fans pull you up on this.
I'd love nothing more to say it wasn't a penalty, I like Spurs and dislike United but you have to say what you see and get over your bias.
‘Not watching the game but’
Riiiight
You haven’t seen the incident but it must have been a wrong biased decision eh?
Yes, the VAR official is clearly cheating in favour of Man Utd.
I mean, that’s the only conclusion, right?
It seems VAR is wrong even when its right for some people. 😂
Not watching the game
----------------------
So you end up complaining about a correct VAR call
Not watching the game but how convenient that this lot get yet another VAR decision with the opposition getting a goal chalked off, which will result in another 3 points for Utd
--------------------------------
your paragraph start - there you go op - watch that part to find out why
Saw the VAR decision. Got to say verrryyyyy harsh on Watford.
This natural silhouette has been forgotten it seems.
Are SteveF and Sandy the same person ?
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 44 minutes ago
Are SteveF and Sandy the same person ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy's sock account
Billy is a Sandy sock account
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 hours, 33 minutes ago
Yes, the VAR official is clearly cheating in favour of Man Utd.
I mean, that’s the only conclusion, right?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah! 🙄🤣
You are such a whiney little pu$$y op
I bet even your mrs (if you have one) probably tells you to shut the feck up whinging even when shes on the blob.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Well, well another VAR in favour of Utd
Page 1 of 1
posted on 23/2/20
They are now level at the top with VAR decisions in their favour. Although that's not to say they weren't correct decisions.
posted on 23/2/20
Well, well, well another correct decision.
Strange article from a Spurs fan after another VAR error went in your favour yesterday.
posted on 23/2/20
Their 10th penalty of the PL season so far, and they`ve conceded just 1.
Spurs have been given just 2, and conceded 6.
The only 2 teams not to concede a penalty this season in the PL are Liverpool and Newcastle.
posted on 23/2/20
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 11 minutes ago
They are now level at the top with VAR decisions in their favour. Although that's not to say they weren't correct decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs are probably above us in the VAR decisions. Do t tell the Bacofoil boys that though as it doesn’t fit their paranoid narrative
posted on 23/2/20
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● (U3924)
posted 4 minutes ago
Their 10th penalty of the PL season so far, and they`ve conceded just 1.
Spurs have been given just 2, and conceded 6.
The only 2 teams not to concede a penalty this season in the PL are Liverpool and Newcastle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just saying that United have had 10 penalties doesn't really mean anything - are there any that shouldn't have been given? That is the more important question... Is anyone suggesting that today's pen shouldn't have been one?
Or are we just saying that United are clearly favoured by VAR because mostly the correct decisions have been given?
I disagree with the new rule about handball, but I don't think anyone can argue that it's VARs fault that it was disallowed - the rule is wrong.
posted on 23/2/20
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● (U3924)
posted 5 minutes ago
Their 10th penalty of the PL season so far, and they`ve conceded just 1.
Spurs have been given just 2, and conceded 6.
The only 2 teams not to concede a penalty this season in the PL are Liverpool and Newcastle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair we've only conceded 15 goals and have averaged 62% possession, therefore it's only natural that we've conceded less penalties.
posted on 23/2/20
Correct decision.
Man played the ball with his arm, so hand ball.
posted on 23/2/20
comment by (U22329)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● (U3924)
posted 4 minutes ago
Their 10th penalty of the PL season so far, and they`ve conceded just 1.
Spurs have been given just 2, and conceded 6.
The only 2 teams not to concede a penalty this season in the PL are Liverpool and Newcastle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just saying that United have had 10 penalties doesn't really mean anything - are there any that shouldn't have been given? That is the more important question... Is anyone suggesting that today's pen shouldn't have been one?
Or are we just saying that United are clearly favoured by VAR because mostly the correct decisions have been given?
I disagree with the new rule about handball, but I don't think anyone can argue that it's VARs fault that it was disallowed - the rule is wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the one they got at Old Toilet against Spurs should not have been given for a start, Rashford felt his ankle grazed and dived a second later. In no way was he impeded from completing his action and the contact was miniscule.
posted on 23/2/20
Why is this on the spurs board? Should be only spurs fans posting articles about spurs
posted on 23/2/20
To be fair we've only conceded 15 goals and have averaged 62% possession, therefore it's only natural that we've conceded less penalties.
=========================================
Yes and even when Van Dyke scythes down an Everton player in the penalty area when clean through on goal, the officials ignore it, so there is little wonder you have not conceded one.
posted on 23/2/20
Jose
posted on 23/2/20
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● (U3924)
posted 28 seconds ago
To be fair we've only conceded 15 goals and have averaged 62% possession, therefore it's only natural that we've conceded less penalties.
=========================================
Yes and even when Van Dyke scythes down an Everton player in the penalty area when clean through on goal, the officials ignore it, so there is little wonder you have not conceded one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scythes down? Does that mean leans into him with his shoulder, using his strength and the player goes over as he was weaker? If so, then, you're correct.
The Rashford one was clearly a penalty, Sissokop stood on his foot.
You're just too biased to see anything that isn't a benefit to Spurs, as you've clearly demonstrated throughout your time on the site. Even your own fans pull you up on this.
posted on 23/2/20
I'd love nothing more to say it wasn't a penalty, I like Spurs and dislike United but you have to say what you see and get over your bias.
posted on 23/2/20
‘Not watching the game but’
Riiiight
posted on 23/2/20
You haven’t seen the incident but it must have been a wrong biased decision eh?
posted on 23/2/20
Yes, the VAR official is clearly cheating in favour of Man Utd.
I mean, that’s the only conclusion, right?
posted on 23/2/20
It seems VAR is wrong even when its right for some people. 😂
posted on 23/2/20
Not watching the game
----------------------
So you end up complaining about a correct VAR call
posted on 23/2/20
Not watching the game but how convenient that this lot get yet another VAR decision with the opposition getting a goal chalked off, which will result in another 3 points for Utd
--------------------------------
your paragraph start - there you go op - watch that part to find out why
posted on 23/2/20
Saw the VAR decision. Got to say verrryyyyy harsh on Watford.
This natural silhouette has been forgotten it seems.
posted on 23/2/20
Are SteveF and Sandy the same person ?
posted on 23/2/20
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 44 minutes ago
Are SteveF and Sandy the same person ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy's sock account
posted on 23/2/20
Billy is a Sandy sock account
posted on 23/2/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 hours, 33 minutes ago
Yes, the VAR official is clearly cheating in favour of Man Utd.
I mean, that’s the only conclusion, right?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah! 🙄🤣
posted on 23/2/20
You are such a whiney little pu$$y op
I bet even your mrs (if you have one) probably tells you to shut the feck up whinging even when shes on the blob.
Page 1 of 1