This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 1 minute ago
Fans of other clubs should be grateful. We were the guinea pigs for what the executives of most other top tier must have been considering. Loads saying they’d turn their back on their own clubs if they did the same, now we’ve made pretty much ensured others will have to follow suit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You weren't the first club to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry, I meant big clubs. Should have been more specific
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charming
----------------------------------------------------------------------
First bit of footie bantz for ages. Feels good
I was listening to TAW earlier they were saying that Frulough is more commonly used in America so maybe they didn't think it would be as badly received as it was, but you'd have thought they'd have gauged opinion in the UK first.
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 0 seconds ago
i was disappointed it even got to this stage, had a feeling they would reverse their decision as history shows they do actually listen to fans and have reversed decisions before like the ticket price increase plans. Still have to question why they didnt ask before, and prevent damage to the reputation, who advised them it'd be wise? needs sacking on the spot, poor very poor.
Some clubs might have no choice, but just like the ticket price inc our club theres no need, atleast not at this point. Some seriously poor decisions being made from them but atleast they've got the ball to hold their hands up and right their wrongs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
infact there was that much of a need for ticket price increases to cover stadium expansion costs that without even doing it in the end, it was such a success theyre already moving on with planning a second stand expansion sometimes you wonder who theyre trying to kid, kidding themselves.
We're well run in a lot of aspects but it worries me how they get some basic stuff so wrong.
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 1 minute ago
I was listening to TAW earlier they were saying that Frulough is more commonly used in America so maybe they didn't think it would be as badly received as it was, but you'd have thought they'd have gauged opinion in the UK first.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah American sports clubs get the tax payer to pay for loads over there. They do it all the time with stadiums.
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Furloughing should be treated as the same as a club going into administration. Points deduction.
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} 👽 🐎 #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by lfc65 (U17359)
posted 1 minute ago
Won’t impact our transfers at all even if it’s say 300 people they furloughed , it would only be. Max of £7500 each which is c £2m - nothing in turf terms . That’s why the clubs decision to furlough was stupid. Fair play for reversing it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you seen the last Financial Account? Go to companies house and go through the outgoings. See for yourself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but the furlough scheme is capped at £2500 a month , so what the salaries are doesn’t make a difference .
Well, it certainly makes Spurs look alot worse to be honest.
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So United have just announced it? So they didn’t dismiss it at the start at all, they’ve waited to see what happened with other clubs.
Feck me Arab, you’re thick as feck. Stop making things up.
comment by Barf Vader (U15867)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Furloughing should be treated as the same as a club going into administration. Points deduction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool could take the hit
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Barf Vader (U15867)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Furloughing should be treated as the same as a club going into administration. Points deduction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool could take the hit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, just take the maximum 12 points off us if you want
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So United have just announced it? So they didn’t dismiss it at the start at all, they’ve waited to see what happened with other clubs.
Feck me Arab, you’re thick as feck. Stop making things up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? They announced it like an hour before your announcement And they’ve already got players to donate 30% of their wages to the NHS. Stop trying to make out we are any way the same. You lot sold out and started to back track when the media turned on you.
U Turn FC.
Finally past player and pressure reversed a stupid decision. Shame took too long to kick in.
good decision
Wonder if self proclaimed big club Spurs will follow suit
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So United have just announced it? So they didn’t dismiss it at the start at all, they’ve waited to see what happened with other clubs.
Feck me Arab, you’re thick as feck. Stop making things up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? They announced it like an hour before your announcementAnd they’ve already got players to donate 30% of their wages to the NHS. Stop trying to make out we are any way the same. You lot sold out and started to back track when the media turned on you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
An hour before, so still not anywhere near the same as dismissing it at the start, is it? And it’s after they’ve seen the reaction to our original decision. So you made it up so you could do your usual trolling.
A great gesture by your players to donate money, but nothing to do with this article.
Levy opening himself up for a lynching now
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So United have just announced it? So they didn’t dismiss it at the start at all, they’ve waited to see what happened with other clubs.
Feck me Arab, you’re thick as feck. Stop making things up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? They announced it like an hour before your announcementAnd they’ve already got players to donate 30% of their wages to the NHS. Stop trying to make out we are any way the same. You lot sold out and started to back track when the media turned on you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
An hour before, so still not anywhere near the same as dismissing it at the start, is it? And it’s after they’ve seen the reaction to our original decision. So you made it up so you could do your usual trolling.
A great gesture by your players to donate money, but nothing to do with this article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe United went through their finances and worked out that financially they are currently able to continue to fund non playing staff.
Liverpool obviously were not in a position to do so. Obviously they have had a cash windfall in the past 48 hours that has enabled them to reverse their decision.
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So United have just announced it? So they didn’t dismiss it at the start at all, they’ve waited to see what happened with other clubs.
Feck me Arab, you’re thick as feck. Stop making things up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? They announced it like an hour before your announcementAnd they’ve already got players to donate 30% of their wages to the NHS. Stop trying to make out we are any way the same. You lot sold out and started to back track when the media turned on you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
An hour before, so still not anywhere near the same as dismissing it at the start, is it? And it’s after they’ve seen the reaction to our original decision. So you made it up so you could do your usual trolling.
A great gesture by your players to donate money, but nothing to do with this article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
24 hours before actually if you want to be pedantic. Stop trying to worm out of this, grow a pair and admit your club pussssied out because of media pressure. Still the same club that tried to ponce off the tax payer
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-8189889/Manchester-United-ready-resist-furloughing-900-non-playing-staff.html
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 1 minute ago
I was listening to TAW earlier they were saying that Frulough is more commonly used in America so maybe they didn't think it would be as badly received as it was, but you'd have thought they'd have gauged opinion in the UK first.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah American sports clubs get the tax payer to pay for loads over there. They do it all the time with stadiums.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Furloughing in the states in 30%
Also the tax payer pays way lower tax than over here
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} 👽 🐎 #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Less money for next transfer window (whenever that is). The club is bleeding money but people prefer to get emotional without properly thinking of the repercussions. Oh well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah we should just let the public pay for it
comment by Oscar. 2019 YEAR OF THE MACK! #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 7 minutes ago
good decision
Wonder if self proclaimed big club Spurs will follow suit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No Levy will make more cuts. No budget for transfers for the next decade too.
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
And they say publicly shaming people is bad practice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Certainly not the Scottish chief medical officer...fackin dumb bint
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So United have just announced it? So they didn’t dismiss it at the start at all, they’ve waited to see what happened with other clubs.
Feck me Arab, you’re thick as feck. Stop making things up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? They announced it like an hour before your announcementAnd they’ve already got players to donate 30% of their wages to the NHS. Stop trying to make out we are any way the same. You lot sold out and started to back track when the media turned on you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
An hour before, so still not anywhere near the same as dismissing it at the start, is it? And it’s after they’ve seen the reaction to our original decision. So you made it up so you could do your usual trolling.
A great gesture by your players to donate money, but nothing to do with this article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
24 hours before actually if you want to be pedantic. Stop trying to worm out of this, grow a pair and admit your club pussssied out because of media pressure. Still the same club that tried to ponce off the tax payer
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-8189889/Manchester-United-ready-resist-furloughing-900-non-playing-staff.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re the one that Said it was an hour before, I’m going off the info you’re providing.
Who’s actually saying the club haven’t backed down due to pressure? No one, yet another thing you’re blatantly making up. You’re a terrible poster.
Sign in if you want to comment
Furlough Decision Reversed
Page 3 of 4
posted on 6/4/20
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 1 minute ago
Fans of other clubs should be grateful. We were the guinea pigs for what the executives of most other top tier must have been considering. Loads saying they’d turn their back on their own clubs if they did the same, now we’ve made pretty much ensured others will have to follow suit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You weren't the first club to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry, I meant big clubs. Should have been more specific
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charming
----------------------------------------------------------------------
First bit of footie bantz for ages. Feels good
posted on 6/4/20
I was listening to TAW earlier they were saying that Frulough is more commonly used in America so maybe they didn't think it would be as badly received as it was, but you'd have thought they'd have gauged opinion in the UK first.
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 0 seconds ago
i was disappointed it even got to this stage, had a feeling they would reverse their decision as history shows they do actually listen to fans and have reversed decisions before like the ticket price increase plans. Still have to question why they didnt ask before, and prevent damage to the reputation, who advised them it'd be wise? needs sacking on the spot, poor very poor.
Some clubs might have no choice, but just like the ticket price inc our club theres no need, atleast not at this point. Some seriously poor decisions being made from them but atleast they've got the ball to hold their hands up and right their wrongs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
infact there was that much of a need for ticket price increases to cover stadium expansion costs that without even doing it in the end, it was such a success theyre already moving on with planning a second stand expansion sometimes you wonder who theyre trying to kid, kidding themselves.
We're well run in a lot of aspects but it worries me how they get some basic stuff so wrong.
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
posted on 6/4/20
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 1 minute ago
I was listening to TAW earlier they were saying that Frulough is more commonly used in America so maybe they didn't think it would be as badly received as it was, but you'd have thought they'd have gauged opinion in the UK first.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah American sports clubs get the tax payer to pay for loads over there. They do it all the time with stadiums.
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Furloughing should be treated as the same as a club going into administration. Points deduction.
posted on 6/4/20
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} 👽 🐎 #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by lfc65 (U17359)
posted 1 minute ago
Won’t impact our transfers at all even if it’s say 300 people they furloughed , it would only be. Max of £7500 each which is c £2m - nothing in turf terms . That’s why the clubs decision to furlough was stupid. Fair play for reversing it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you seen the last Financial Account? Go to companies house and go through the outgoings. See for yourself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but the furlough scheme is capped at £2500 a month , so what the salaries are doesn’t make a difference .
posted on 6/4/20
Well, it certainly makes Spurs look alot worse to be honest.
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So United have just announced it? So they didn’t dismiss it at the start at all, they’ve waited to see what happened with other clubs.
Feck me Arab, you’re thick as feck. Stop making things up.
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Barf Vader (U15867)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Furloughing should be treated as the same as a club going into administration. Points deduction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool could take the hit
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Barf Vader (U15867)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Furloughing should be treated as the same as a club going into administration. Points deduction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool could take the hit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, just take the maximum 12 points off us if you want
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So United have just announced it? So they didn’t dismiss it at the start at all, they’ve waited to see what happened with other clubs.
Feck me Arab, you’re thick as feck. Stop making things up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? They announced it like an hour before your announcement And they’ve already got players to donate 30% of their wages to the NHS. Stop trying to make out we are any way the same. You lot sold out and started to back track when the media turned on you.
posted on 6/4/20
U Turn FC.
Finally past player and pressure reversed a stupid decision. Shame took too long to kick in.
posted on 6/4/20
good decision
Wonder if self proclaimed big club Spurs will follow suit
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So United have just announced it? So they didn’t dismiss it at the start at all, they’ve waited to see what happened with other clubs.
Feck me Arab, you’re thick as feck. Stop making things up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? They announced it like an hour before your announcementAnd they’ve already got players to donate 30% of their wages to the NHS. Stop trying to make out we are any way the same. You lot sold out and started to back track when the media turned on you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
An hour before, so still not anywhere near the same as dismissing it at the start, is it? And it’s after they’ve seen the reaction to our original decision. So you made it up so you could do your usual trolling.
A great gesture by your players to donate money, but nothing to do with this article.
posted on 6/4/20
Levy opening himself up for a lynching now
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So United have just announced it? So they didn’t dismiss it at the start at all, they’ve waited to see what happened with other clubs.
Feck me Arab, you’re thick as feck. Stop making things up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? They announced it like an hour before your announcementAnd they’ve already got players to donate 30% of their wages to the NHS. Stop trying to make out we are any way the same. You lot sold out and started to back track when the media turned on you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
An hour before, so still not anywhere near the same as dismissing it at the start, is it? And it’s after they’ve seen the reaction to our original decision. So you made it up so you could do your usual trolling.
A great gesture by your players to donate money, but nothing to do with this article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe United went through their finances and worked out that financially they are currently able to continue to fund non playing staff.
Liverpool obviously were not in a position to do so. Obviously they have had a cash windfall in the past 48 hours that has enabled them to reverse their decision.
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So United have just announced it? So they didn’t dismiss it at the start at all, they’ve waited to see what happened with other clubs.
Feck me Arab, you’re thick as feck. Stop making things up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? They announced it like an hour before your announcementAnd they’ve already got players to donate 30% of their wages to the NHS. Stop trying to make out we are any way the same. You lot sold out and started to back track when the media turned on you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
An hour before, so still not anywhere near the same as dismissing it at the start, is it? And it’s after they’ve seen the reaction to our original decision. So you made it up so you could do your usual trolling.
A great gesture by your players to donate money, but nothing to do with this article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
24 hours before actually if you want to be pedantic. Stop trying to worm out of this, grow a pair and admit your club pussssied out because of media pressure. Still the same club that tried to ponce off the tax payer
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-8189889/Manchester-United-ready-resist-furloughing-900-non-playing-staff.html
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 1 minute ago
I was listening to TAW earlier they were saying that Frulough is more commonly used in America so maybe they didn't think it would be as badly received as it was, but you'd have thought they'd have gauged opinion in the UK first.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah American sports clubs get the tax payer to pay for loads over there. They do it all the time with stadiums.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Furloughing in the states in 30%
Also the tax payer pays way lower tax than over here
posted on 6/4/20
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} 👽 🐎 #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Less money for next transfer window (whenever that is). The club is bleeding money but people prefer to get emotional without properly thinking of the repercussions. Oh well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah we should just let the public pay for it
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Oscar. 2019 YEAR OF THE MACK! #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 7 minutes ago
good decision
Wonder if self proclaimed big club Spurs will follow suit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No Levy will make more cuts. No budget for transfers for the next decade too.
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
And they say publicly shaming people is bad practice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Certainly not the Scottish chief medical officer...fackin dumb bint
posted on 6/4/20
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sergio Marquina (U11781)
posted 37 seconds ago
This has to be put into context - Liverpool only reversed because of humiliation.
Clubs like City, Utd and Chelsea dismissed furlough as a nonsense from the start.
So while plaudits are being dished out for FSG, remember what their initial intentions were.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have they publicly dismissed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. United just announced no furlough. Same with Burnley. City announced two days ago. Very embarrassing if you’ve got Burnley not going down that road and they’re being threatened with administration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So United have just announced it? So they didn’t dismiss it at the start at all, they’ve waited to see what happened with other clubs.
Feck me Arab, you’re thick as feck. Stop making things up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? They announced it like an hour before your announcementAnd they’ve already got players to donate 30% of their wages to the NHS. Stop trying to make out we are any way the same. You lot sold out and started to back track when the media turned on you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
An hour before, so still not anywhere near the same as dismissing it at the start, is it? And it’s after they’ve seen the reaction to our original decision. So you made it up so you could do your usual trolling.
A great gesture by your players to donate money, but nothing to do with this article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
24 hours before actually if you want to be pedantic. Stop trying to worm out of this, grow a pair and admit your club pussssied out because of media pressure. Still the same club that tried to ponce off the tax payer
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-8189889/Manchester-United-ready-resist-furloughing-900-non-playing-staff.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re the one that Said it was an hour before, I’m going off the info you’re providing.
Who’s actually saying the club haven’t backed down due to pressure? No one, yet another thing you’re blatantly making up. You’re a terrible poster.
Page 3 of 4