I dont think we can now afford to rotate vs Palace, which is a must win game in the race for top 4.
I been very pleased with recent results.
Rotating may or may not have helped last night, but we will never know.
-----------
This article states that he should have rotated and it was poor management that he didnt
Not read all the replies but Utd have an insane fixture list (due to winning games) and a lack of quality squad depth.
Id hazard a guess CL football is not quite vital but VERY important for Utd this year, Southampton are a good side and as such a couple of points were dropped.
The balance between attack and defence is tricky and although I've degended Maguire plenty he's not done so well the last few games, Bournemouth and Southampton in particular.
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
The United manager shouldnt be making decisions for fear of criticism from fans online.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very much he is
Unless he is a member on here
I knew it. Winston is actually Ole
the obvious plan was to secure the 3 points last night to give a bit of breathing space and rotate against palace.
It was, as Ji said earlier, a calculated risk to continuing on with the same starting 11, that was only a couple of minutes away from paying off.
We go into the palace game with a rotated starting 11 which was likely to happen regardless.
As absurd as this is to say about a defender that cost as much as he did, but I feel Maguire needs a certain type of player next to him.
Someone agile, who reads the game well.
I'm thinking Terry alongside Gallas, Carvalho.
Perhaps that is wishful thinking.
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
The United manager shouldnt be making decisions for fear of criticism from fans online.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very much he is
Unless he is a member on here
I knew it. Winston is actually Ole
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeg kan ikke tro at du har funnet ut av det! Sssshhh!
I see all Winston my old china
Ole did what he thought right, and it almost paid off.
As we are in a very good run keeping the same team is sensible.
Southampton are no mugs, and i thought we would drop points. If ee had rotated we may have lost all three.
Southampton are a good side indeed, they had a shocking start to the season but since then have done very well. They have some players that are better than a lot of people give them credit for, the likes of Romeu, Bednarek, Armstrong and Stephens in particular fly under the radar a little.
So not a huge surprise that points were dropped by you. It’s not like you just got trounced 4-1 by Solanke and co at Bournemouth
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 48 minutes ago
Ole did what he thought right, and it almost paid off.
As we are in a very good run keeping the same team is sensible.
Southampton are no mugs, and i thought we would drop points. If ee had rotated we may have lost all three.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If not for the injury to Williams we would have got the 3 points. Then we could have rotated against Palace and played a strong team against Chelsea. Only bad luck has meant that the risk didn't pay off.
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 48 minutes ago
Ole did what he thought right, and it almost paid off.
As we are in a very good run keeping the same team is sensible.
Southampton are no mugs, and i thought we would drop points. If ee had rotated we may have lost all three.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If not for the injury to Williams we would have got the 3 points. Then we could have rotated against Palace and played a strong team against Chelsea. Only bad luck has meant that the risk didn't pay off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's looking like it was a damned if he did or damned if he didn't starting selection
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 2 hours, 25 minutes ago
I been very pleased with recent results.
Rotating may or may not have helped last night, but we will never know.
-----------
This article states that he should have rotated and it was poor management that he didnt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. That is my opinion.
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
The United manager shouldnt be making decisions for fear of criticism from fans online.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very much he is
Unless he is a member on here
I knew it. Winston is actually Ole
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why else would people keep suggesting he is damned if he did and damned if he didnt if he isnt going to be aware of any of the criticism?
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 1 hour, 59 minutes ago
the obvious plan was to secure the 3 points last night to give a bit of breathing space and rotate against palace.
It was, as Ji said earlier, a calculated risk to continuing on with the same starting 11, that was only a couple of minutes away from paying off.
We go into the palace game with a rotated starting 11 which was likely to happen regardless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly. The game is now far more important than it was before Southampton equalised.
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 48 minutes ago
Ole did what he thought right, and it almost paid off.
As we are in a very good run keeping the same team is sensible.
Southampton are no mugs, and i thought we would drop points. If ee had rotated we may have lost all three.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If not for the injury to Williams we would have got the 3 points. Then we could have rotated against Palace and played a strong team against Chelsea. Only bad luck has meant that the risk didn't pay off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's looking like it was a damned if he did or damned if he didn't starting selection
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would anyone really have complained had Bailly, William's, McTominay and Fred started last night?
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 48 minutes ago
Ole did what he thought right, and it almost paid off.
As we are in a very good run keeping the same team is sensible.
Southampton are no mugs, and i thought we would drop points. If ee had rotated we may have lost all three.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If not for the injury to Williams we would have got the 3 points. Then we could have rotated against Palace and played a strong team against Chelsea. Only bad luck has meant that the risk didn't pay off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's looking like it was a damned if he did or damned if he didn't starting selection
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would anyone really have complained had Bailly, William's, McTominay and Fred started last night?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would have if it didnt work out
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 seconds ago
If you say so Treacle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would think most here would say so
Hence the damned if he did and damned if he didnt comments
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
The United manager shouldnt be making decisions for fear of criticism from fans online.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very much he is
Unless he is a member on here
I knew it. Winston is actually Ole
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why else would people keep suggesting he is damned if he did and damned if he didnt if he isnt going to be aware of any of the criticism?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What?????
All i said was I seriously doubt Ole makes his decisions based on criticism he may receive on online forums.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
The United manager shouldnt be making decisions for fear of criticism from fans online.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very much he is
Unless he is a member on here
I knew it. Winston is actually Ole
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeg kan ikke tro at du har funnet ut av det! Sssshhh!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Winstons has a stroke
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 seconds ago
If you say so Treacle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would think most here would say so
Hence the damned if he did and damned if he didnt comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most would what?
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
The United manager shouldnt be making decisions for fear of criticism from fans online.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very much he is
Unless he is a member on here
I knew it. Winston is actually Ole
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why else would people keep suggesting he is damned if he did and damned if he didnt if he isnt going to be aware of any of the criticism?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What?????
All i said was I seriously doubt Ole makes his decisions based on criticism he may receive on online forums.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree. I was being sarcastic.
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 48 minutes ago
Ole did what he thought right, and it almost paid off.
As we are in a very good run keeping the same team is sensible.
Southampton are no mugs, and i thought we would drop points. If ee had rotated we may have lost all three.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If not for the injury to Williams we would have got the 3 points. Then we could have rotated against Palace and played a strong team against Chelsea. Only bad luck has meant that the risk didn't pay off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's looking like it was a damned if he did or damned if he didn't starting selection
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would anyone really have complained had Bailly, William's, McTominay and Fred started last night?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Except you if we hadn't won. Then you'd be saying that Ole should have played his strongest team.
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 seconds ago
If you say so Treacle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would think most here would say so
Hence the damned if he did and damned if he didnt comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most would what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would what what ?
Sign in if you want to comment
Oles mistake
Page 5 of 6
6
posted on 14/7/20
I dont think we can now afford to rotate vs Palace, which is a must win game in the race for top 4.
posted on 14/7/20
I been very pleased with recent results.
Rotating may or may not have helped last night, but we will never know.
-----------
This article states that he should have rotated and it was poor management that he didnt
posted on 14/7/20
Not read all the replies but Utd have an insane fixture list (due to winning games) and a lack of quality squad depth.
Id hazard a guess CL football is not quite vital but VERY important for Utd this year, Southampton are a good side and as such a couple of points were dropped.
The balance between attack and defence is tricky and although I've degended Maguire plenty he's not done so well the last few games, Bournemouth and Southampton in particular.
posted on 14/7/20
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
The United manager shouldnt be making decisions for fear of criticism from fans online.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very much he is
Unless he is a member on here
I knew it. Winston is actually Ole
posted on 14/7/20
the obvious plan was to secure the 3 points last night to give a bit of breathing space and rotate against palace.
It was, as Ji said earlier, a calculated risk to continuing on with the same starting 11, that was only a couple of minutes away from paying off.
We go into the palace game with a rotated starting 11 which was likely to happen regardless.
posted on 14/7/20
As absurd as this is to say about a defender that cost as much as he did, but I feel Maguire needs a certain type of player next to him.
Someone agile, who reads the game well.
I'm thinking Terry alongside Gallas, Carvalho.
Perhaps that is wishful thinking.
posted on 14/7/20
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
The United manager shouldnt be making decisions for fear of criticism from fans online.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very much he is
Unless he is a member on here
I knew it. Winston is actually Ole
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeg kan ikke tro at du har funnet ut av det! Sssshhh!
posted on 14/7/20
I see all Winston my old china
posted on 14/7/20
Ole did what he thought right, and it almost paid off.
As we are in a very good run keeping the same team is sensible.
Southampton are no mugs, and i thought we would drop points. If ee had rotated we may have lost all three.
posted on 14/7/20
Southampton are a good side indeed, they had a shocking start to the season but since then have done very well. They have some players that are better than a lot of people give them credit for, the likes of Romeu, Bednarek, Armstrong and Stephens in particular fly under the radar a little.
So not a huge surprise that points were dropped by you. It’s not like you just got trounced 4-1 by Solanke and co at Bournemouth
posted on 14/7/20
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 48 minutes ago
Ole did what he thought right, and it almost paid off.
As we are in a very good run keeping the same team is sensible.
Southampton are no mugs, and i thought we would drop points. If ee had rotated we may have lost all three.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If not for the injury to Williams we would have got the 3 points. Then we could have rotated against Palace and played a strong team against Chelsea. Only bad luck has meant that the risk didn't pay off.
posted on 14/7/20
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 48 minutes ago
Ole did what he thought right, and it almost paid off.
As we are in a very good run keeping the same team is sensible.
Southampton are no mugs, and i thought we would drop points. If ee had rotated we may have lost all three.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If not for the injury to Williams we would have got the 3 points. Then we could have rotated against Palace and played a strong team against Chelsea. Only bad luck has meant that the risk didn't pay off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's looking like it was a damned if he did or damned if he didn't starting selection
posted on 14/7/20
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 2 hours, 25 minutes ago
I been very pleased with recent results.
Rotating may or may not have helped last night, but we will never know.
-----------
This article states that he should have rotated and it was poor management that he didnt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. That is my opinion.
posted on 14/7/20
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
The United manager shouldnt be making decisions for fear of criticism from fans online.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very much he is
Unless he is a member on here
I knew it. Winston is actually Ole
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why else would people keep suggesting he is damned if he did and damned if he didnt if he isnt going to be aware of any of the criticism?
posted on 14/7/20
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 1 hour, 59 minutes ago
the obvious plan was to secure the 3 points last night to give a bit of breathing space and rotate against palace.
It was, as Ji said earlier, a calculated risk to continuing on with the same starting 11, that was only a couple of minutes away from paying off.
We go into the palace game with a rotated starting 11 which was likely to happen regardless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly. The game is now far more important than it was before Southampton equalised.
posted on 14/7/20
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 48 minutes ago
Ole did what he thought right, and it almost paid off.
As we are in a very good run keeping the same team is sensible.
Southampton are no mugs, and i thought we would drop points. If ee had rotated we may have lost all three.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If not for the injury to Williams we would have got the 3 points. Then we could have rotated against Palace and played a strong team against Chelsea. Only bad luck has meant that the risk didn't pay off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's looking like it was a damned if he did or damned if he didn't starting selection
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would anyone really have complained had Bailly, William's, McTominay and Fred started last night?
posted on 14/7/20
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 48 minutes ago
Ole did what he thought right, and it almost paid off.
As we are in a very good run keeping the same team is sensible.
Southampton are no mugs, and i thought we would drop points. If ee had rotated we may have lost all three.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If not for the injury to Williams we would have got the 3 points. Then we could have rotated against Palace and played a strong team against Chelsea. Only bad luck has meant that the risk didn't pay off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's looking like it was a damned if he did or damned if he didn't starting selection
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would anyone really have complained had Bailly, William's, McTominay and Fred started last night?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would have if it didnt work out
posted on 14/7/20
If you say so Treacle.
posted on 14/7/20
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 seconds ago
If you say so Treacle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would think most here would say so
Hence the damned if he did and damned if he didnt comments
posted on 14/7/20
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
The United manager shouldnt be making decisions for fear of criticism from fans online.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very much he is
Unless he is a member on here
I knew it. Winston is actually Ole
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why else would people keep suggesting he is damned if he did and damned if he didnt if he isnt going to be aware of any of the criticism?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What?????
All i said was I seriously doubt Ole makes his decisions based on criticism he may receive on online forums.
posted on 14/7/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
The United manager shouldnt be making decisions for fear of criticism from fans online.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very much he is
Unless he is a member on here
I knew it. Winston is actually Ole
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeg kan ikke tro at du har funnet ut av det! Sssshhh!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Winstons has a stroke
posted on 14/7/20
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 seconds ago
If you say so Treacle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would think most here would say so
Hence the damned if he did and damned if he didnt comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most would what?
posted on 14/7/20
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
The United manager shouldnt be making decisions for fear of criticism from fans online.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt very much he is
Unless he is a member on here
I knew it. Winston is actually Ole
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why else would people keep suggesting he is damned if he did and damned if he didnt if he isnt going to be aware of any of the criticism?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What?????
All i said was I seriously doubt Ole makes his decisions based on criticism he may receive on online forums.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree. I was being sarcastic.
posted on 14/7/20
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 48 minutes ago
Ole did what he thought right, and it almost paid off.
As we are in a very good run keeping the same team is sensible.
Southampton are no mugs, and i thought we would drop points. If ee had rotated we may have lost all three.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If not for the injury to Williams we would have got the 3 points. Then we could have rotated against Palace and played a strong team against Chelsea. Only bad luck has meant that the risk didn't pay off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's looking like it was a damned if he did or damned if he didn't starting selection
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would anyone really have complained had Bailly, William's, McTominay and Fred started last night?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Except you if we hadn't won. Then you'd be saying that Ole should have played his strongest team.
posted on 14/7/20
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 5 seconds ago
If you say so Treacle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would think most here would say so
Hence the damned if he did and damned if he didnt comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most would what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would what what ?
Page 5 of 6
6