or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 10 comments are related to an article called:

Roe Vs Wade

Page 1 of 1

posted on 24/6/22

Gay marriage will be next as it was also in that leaked document.

Republicans in America seem willing to take them back to the 1950s.

posted on 24/6/22

Wade Barrett

posted on 24/6/22

Abortion is a very emotive issue and both sides of the argument have merits.

The rights of the female against the rights of their unborn child.

I do not think that falling on either side of the argument can be criticised really and it is very hard to legislate in these circumstances.

posted on 24/6/22

This isn’t new news. It was known this would happen two months ago.

posted on 24/6/22

comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 38 minutes ago
Abortion is a very emotive issue and both sides of the argument have merits.

The rights of the female against the rights of their unborn child.

I do not think that falling on either side of the argument can be criticised really and it is very hard to legislate in these circumstances.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

What utter cobblers. Utter, utter cobblers.

posted on 24/6/22

comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 4 hours, 46 minutes ago
Abortion is a very emotive issue and both sides of the argument have merits.

The rights of the female against the rights of their unborn child.

I do not think that falling on either side of the argument can be criticised really and it is very hard to legislate in these circumstances.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it isn’t just football you chat absolute sh’te about then

posted on 24/6/22

I don’t think half the folks commenting on Roe v Wade actually have a clue what A: it is & B: what this ruling actually means.

It essentially puts the power of creating any abortion laws in the hands of state senates. State senates are elected by the people of that state.

If the people of that state want it they can vote for it.

Simple democracy.

posted on 24/6/22

comment by Dwight K Schrute (U22590)
posted 2 hours, 9 minutes ago
I don’t think half the folks commenting on Roe v Wade actually have a clue what A: it is & B: what this ruling actually means.

It essentially puts the power of creating any abortion laws in the hands of state senates. State senates are elected by the people of that state.

If the people of that state want it they can vote for it.

Simple democracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all Greek to me, mate๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜‰

posted on 26/6/22

comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 2 days, 4 hours ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 38 minutes ago
Abortion is a very emotive issue and both sides of the argument have merits.

The rights of the female against the rights of their unborn child.

I do not think that falling on either side of the argument can be criticised really and it is very hard to legislate in these circumstances.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

What utter cobblers. Utter, utter cobblers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

so your down with killing a 3 month unborn child are you? Could do it with your own hands?

you calling the pro life movement utter utter cobblers. you are labelling 00s of miilions/billions of people as being talking utter cobblers.

posted on 26/6/22

comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 2 days ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 4 hours, 46 minutes ago
Abortion is a very emotive issue and both sides of the argument have merits.

The rights of the female against the rights of their unborn child.

I do not think that falling on either side of the argument can be criticised really and it is very hard to legislate in these circumstances.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it isn’t just football you chat absolute sh’te about then
----------------------------------------------------------------------

so having an appreciation of both sides of the argument is talking utter shiiit is it.

My wife lost 3 babies in the first trimester and it is utterly devastating thing to happen. First 2 were not planned. You learn a lot through these experiences, when you expect a child, especially first time, you learn a lot about the development of the unborn baby. You cannot imagine taking the conscious decision to kill it.

Sure there are many many different circumstances that can lead to a pregnancy. And this just makes it hard to provide a hard and fast rule that covers all. A blanket right to abort is, to me, as wrong as legislating against people "doing what they like" with their body...but we live in a world where some rules are for your own good...taking drugs etc. Pro life seeks ro protect the unborn child and if you think that's 100% wrong then fait play to you. All i am saying is that many fund it hard to balance the rights.....Of course you haven't actually expressed a view you've just cut straight to insults, which is your intellectual level in fairness.

half wits like you love to put people in 2 camps and cause division. You are a clueless moron

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment