one of your club legends is Gazza ffs

To kind of quantify my point (or general worry), ideally KWP would become better than the original; or Peirerra will come in and be an upgrade on Walker. Yet the reality is Aurier is exactly this.

It does get a bit frustrating being 'nearly men' and I would love so much for us to win a trophy for a change (especially within good financial constraints like we have shown).

Historically I have hated any genuinely terrible bloke at Spurs but it is probably easier as they haven't given us the same success or performances that your guys have (Terry and Cashley being all time PL greats). Possibly with your club not being as 'romantic' as Spurs are (take that as you please) it doesn't make it as much of an issue.

I dunno really, before this weekend I was a lot more against Aurier than I am after.

comment by Blarmolorous Edd (U14547)
posted 3 minutes ago
one of your club legends is Gazza ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thats very different though, someone who seems an ok bloke with mental issues really shouldn't be comparable and I am surprised I have to explain that.

He beat his wife

Anyway I am off now, I eagerly await your response.

You let him off of that because of mental issues?

Not ok mate

Not to pointless Gazza stuff though that has no baring, isn't particularly comparable and was before a time that I even remember supporting Spurs.

FFS Blarmy got wound up instead of actually answering the long post I wrote. What a waste of time.

Domestic abuse is worse than anything im aware Cole has done

The most absurd case is how socially accepted Mike Tyson seems to be these days

comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 9 minutes ago
To kind of quantify my point (or general worry), ideally KWP would become better than the original; or Peirerra will come in and be an upgrade on Walker. Yet the reality is Aurier is exactly this.

It does get a bit frustrating being 'nearly men' and I would love so much for us to win a trophy for a change (especially within good financial constraints like we have shown).

Historically I have hated any genuinely terrible bloke at Spurs but it is probably easier as they haven't given us the same success or performances that your guys have (Terry and Cashley being all time PL greats). Possibly with your club not being as 'romantic' as Spurs are (take that as you please) it doesn't make it as much of an issue.

I dunno really, before this weekend I was a lot more against Aurier than I am after.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Romantic can translate as naive there.

Roy Keane is a good example of someone who is a completely unlikable piece of sh't of the pitch who arguably aimed to injure players on it. But you can't say you wouldnt have wanted him playing for you.

I wouldn't have wanted Keane to play for us though.

Also I really don't care for Gazza so the comment means nothing really, he was before my time and I don't get the admiration.

Would you be against Aurier? Do you think you would be more against it had you supported Spurs?

Also romantic translated as not financially doped

If you wouldnt have wanted Keane you are weird. Ronaldos a bit of a pr'ck would you have turned him down.

Id want Aurier yeah

Ronaldo is nowhere near comparable to Keane. One is a bit vain and self centred the other tried to end footballers careers.

CR7 is also a hero off the pitch, arrogance is such a crime in this country weirdly

Well its good to guage where your line is

Aurier punched a cop right?

Yeh and said a homophobic remark to Blanc

Blanc is gay?

No bu called him a fagg*t.

Interestingly Aurier errs closer to the acceptable line than Keane because one or two incidents I can forgive.

Even with Alonso, I know I make a big deal but part is WUMing and it is more the fact that the punishment wasn't more severe which tbf wasn't his fault

Edins question of the day

I am all for immigration and all that, and understand how hard it is for the relocating party to move to another country etc.

My question is, should people with poor English skills not have public-serving jobs? Fecking Subway girl this morning could barely understand a word I was saying, so had to make my sandwich by pointing at a lot of things.

I consider langauge skills the main thing potential immigrants should have

Fine with refugees/asylum seekers obvs but they as well should get easy access to learning English once here(which i think they do through some programmes)

That's surely double standards though, because if you were to move abroad I doubt you would necessarily have the language skills.