And this is on our board why?
I can't post on the Chelsea board. Do you have a problem with that?
The Voice In Dalglish's Head - Letvoicebackonthegoonboard2012
Yeah well done Chelsea
Hello Voice
It's a big congratulations from me for Chelsea indeed, hope they do England proud
They should give City a good game. They're flying, City not so much so fingers crossed
I didn't think that Drogba still had that kind of performance still in him. Shame about the dive and game of peekaboo.
Chelsea played well, however, I am still a little shocked they managed to win the tie. Napoli had quite a lot of chances in both legs to finish the tie. Credit to Cech, whenever I've seen him this season he's kept them in so many games.
Hopefully this will give them some confidence to go and beat City and help us out. As for the CL - I cannot see Bayern, Barca, Real or even Milan not putting away the amount of chances they'll create.
Darren
Milan are poor, I think Chelsea would beat Milan and they would give Bayern a game.
As for Barca and Real
As for Barca and Real
_________________________________
We can beat anyone at the Bridge, bring on you have to beat the best to get there
You can beat anyone at the Bridge
You can't beat United even with a 3 goal lead
I am hoping chelsea do man city and make man city not break man utd 19 wins in a row record.
comment by Özils Eyes...MUFC (U11867) posted 1 minute ago
Darren
Milan are poor, I think Chelsea would beat Milan and they would give Bayern a game.
As for Barca and Real
-----------------------------------------------------
Beaten them both before son, stick to your thursday cup while you can!
I disagree that Milan are poor. I know Arsenal were bad at the San Siro, but Milan were fantastic that match and would have beaten most teams in that form. In the group stage they played very well against Barca. Better than United have in our last two matches.
I don't think Chelsea would be able to get a hold on the game against Bayern due to their midfield. And Chelsea''s defence just doesn't look cut out to contain Ribery, Robben, Gomez et el.
Barca
Real
Bayern
Of course those 3 in that order are the favourites and rightly so, they have so many world class forwards it's unbelievable
After those 3 though, AC and Chelsea are the dark horses. A kind draw and path to the final and a miraculous defensive display in the final and who knows
i don't know what was more cringeworthy, tyldesley's commentary or chelsea's choreographed 'atmosphere'. and chelsea won't get as naive a referee in the latter stages. but other than that, yes, credit to chelsea.
In fairness, Chelsea are a better team than Napoli. Napol were shown up for what they are tonight.
ole_1999 (U13262)
posted 16 minutes ago
i don't know what was more cringeworthy, tyldesley's commentary or chelsea's choreographed 'atmosphere'. and chelsea won't get as naive a referee in the latter stages. but other than that, yes, credit to chelsea.===========
You just cant bring yourself to give credit can you
Napoli really should have qualified. They were the better side over the two legs. I know people say 'well you need to put your chances away', and to a certain extent I agree. But Napoli have outplayed both English sides they've faced this season. Very good side.
Darren The King Fletcher - Balotelli's a comedy genius (U10026)
posted 52 seconds ago
Napoli really should have qualified. They were the better side over the two legs. I know people say 'well you need to put your chances away', and to a certain extent I agree. But Napoli have outplayed both English sides they've faced this season. Very good side.
-----------------------------------------
A comment that just reinforces the notion that Manu fans are the least knowledgeable football fans on the planet
I actually disagree, Chelsea were far more better after 20 or 30 mins into the game. 2nd half was all of them just attacking and also defending well at times from crosses into the box and they was more clinical at the end of the day.
Which part of the comment?
I agree for parts of the game Chelsea were very good and they created and took their chances. However, I am saying over the two legs, on the balance of play and chances made, Napoli were the better side. Obviously the best side does not always win.
We had a hell of a lot of chances in the first leg, in all honesty i would say chances wise it was equal over the two legs. Overall i'd also say we just edged it, we battered Napoli in the 2nd half at their place. In both first half's though they were dominant
Credit to CFC for that performance. Great match for the neutral too.
Always want an english side to progress once UTD are out.
However if I was a CFC fan I would be PEED offf big style. Why?
Because tonight you saw the real CFC, and its obvious to me that AVB wasnt liked and as in the past certain players would rather oust a man they dont like and let the fans down than win and play like tonight
CFC fans will hate me for this, but JT is poison for you gys in terms of trophies.
No way tonights CFC would be where they are in the league
How can anyone say Napoli were the better team over the 2 legs?! They edged the first leg but got destroyed Jaipur night. It could and should have been 6 or 7. Overrated team. Even now, after being schooled last night it appears.
Sign in if you want to comment
Credit to Chelsea
Page 1 of 2
posted on 14/3/12
And this is on our board why?
posted on 14/3/12
I can't post on the Chelsea board. Do you have a problem with that?
posted on 14/3/12
The Voice In Dalglish's Head - Letvoicebackonthegoonboard2012
Yeah well done Chelsea
posted on 14/3/12
Hello Voice
It's a big congratulations from me for Chelsea indeed, hope they do England proud
posted on 14/3/12
posted on 14/3/12
They should give City a good game. They're flying, City not so much so fingers crossed
posted on 14/3/12
I didn't think that Drogba still had that kind of performance still in him. Shame about the dive and game of peekaboo.
posted on 14/3/12
Chelsea played well, however, I am still a little shocked they managed to win the tie. Napoli had quite a lot of chances in both legs to finish the tie. Credit to Cech, whenever I've seen him this season he's kept them in so many games.
Hopefully this will give them some confidence to go and beat City and help us out. As for the CL - I cannot see Bayern, Barca, Real or even Milan not putting away the amount of chances they'll create.
posted on 14/3/12
Darren
Milan are poor, I think Chelsea would beat Milan and they would give Bayern a game.
As for Barca and Real
posted on 14/3/12
As for Barca and Real
_________________________________
We can beat anyone at the Bridge, bring on you have to beat the best to get there
posted on 14/3/12
You can beat anyone at the Bridge
You can't beat United even with a 3 goal lead
posted on 14/3/12
I am hoping chelsea do man city and make man city not break man utd 19 wins in a row record.
posted on 14/3/12
comment by Özils Eyes...MUFC (U11867) posted 1 minute ago
Darren
Milan are poor, I think Chelsea would beat Milan and they would give Bayern a game.
As for Barca and Real
-----------------------------------------------------
Beaten them both before son, stick to your thursday cup while you can!
posted on 14/3/12
I disagree that Milan are poor. I know Arsenal were bad at the San Siro, but Milan were fantastic that match and would have beaten most teams in that form. In the group stage they played very well against Barca. Better than United have in our last two matches.
I don't think Chelsea would be able to get a hold on the game against Bayern due to their midfield. And Chelsea''s defence just doesn't look cut out to contain Ribery, Robben, Gomez et el.
posted on 14/3/12
Barca
Real
Bayern
Of course those 3 in that order are the favourites and rightly so, they have so many world class forwards it's unbelievable
After those 3 though, AC and Chelsea are the dark horses. A kind draw and path to the final and a miraculous defensive display in the final and who knows
posted on 14/3/12
i don't know what was more cringeworthy, tyldesley's commentary or chelsea's choreographed 'atmosphere'. and chelsea won't get as naive a referee in the latter stages. but other than that, yes, credit to chelsea.
posted on 14/3/12
In fairness, Chelsea are a better team than Napoli. Napol were shown up for what they are tonight.
posted on 14/3/12
ole_1999 (U13262)
posted 16 minutes ago
i don't know what was more cringeworthy, tyldesley's commentary or chelsea's choreographed 'atmosphere'. and chelsea won't get as naive a referee in the latter stages. but other than that, yes, credit to chelsea.===========
You just cant bring yourself to give credit can you
posted on 14/3/12
Napoli really should have qualified. They were the better side over the two legs. I know people say 'well you need to put your chances away', and to a certain extent I agree. But Napoli have outplayed both English sides they've faced this season. Very good side.
posted on 14/3/12
Darren The King Fletcher - Balotelli's a comedy genius (U10026)
posted 52 seconds ago
Napoli really should have qualified. They were the better side over the two legs. I know people say 'well you need to put your chances away', and to a certain extent I agree. But Napoli have outplayed both English sides they've faced this season. Very good side.
-----------------------------------------
A comment that just reinforces the notion that Manu fans are the least knowledgeable football fans on the planet
posted on 14/3/12
I actually disagree, Chelsea were far more better after 20 or 30 mins into the game. 2nd half was all of them just attacking and also defending well at times from crosses into the box and they was more clinical at the end of the day.
posted on 14/3/12
Which part of the comment?
I agree for parts of the game Chelsea were very good and they created and took their chances. However, I am saying over the two legs, on the balance of play and chances made, Napoli were the better side. Obviously the best side does not always win.
posted on 14/3/12
We had a hell of a lot of chances in the first leg, in all honesty i would say chances wise it was equal over the two legs. Overall i'd also say we just edged it, we battered Napoli in the 2nd half at their place. In both first half's though they were dominant
posted on 15/3/12
Credit to CFC for that performance. Great match for the neutral too.
Always want an english side to progress once UTD are out.
However if I was a CFC fan I would be PEED offf big style. Why?
Because tonight you saw the real CFC, and its obvious to me that AVB wasnt liked and as in the past certain players would rather oust a man they dont like and let the fans down than win and play like tonight
CFC fans will hate me for this, but JT is poison for you gys in terms of trophies.
No way tonights CFC would be where they are in the league
posted on 15/3/12
How can anyone say Napoli were the better team over the 2 legs?! They edged the first leg but got destroyed Jaipur night. It could and should have been 6 or 7. Overrated team. Even now, after being schooled last night it appears.
Page 1 of 2