If we haven't already agreed to sign Podolski, I'd much rather we went for Giroud. He's better suited to the Premier League and offers more imo. I know Podolski is more versatile and probably cheaper than Giroud, but he's not as talented.
Giroud is an absolute giant - he's brilliant in the air, he's got great technique for such a big man and he works hard for the team. Podolski is more agile and can play in a left-forward position, but he's just not as good as Giroud. He's also got serious attitude problems.
Browse:
Giroud >> Podolski
comment by John Locke (U1204)
posted on 13/4/12
Giroud can control a football, Chamakh cannot. They're nothing like each other ffs.
Chamakh was average in Ligue 1, people were creaming over him because his team won the league. He scored like 12 goals all season. Giroud has 19 already and there's still more games.
comment by 8bit (U2653)
posted on 13/4/12
They're completely different players though, Chamakh was still shot shy and lacked cutting edge in France as well.
comment by Dubbed <ok> (U9163)
posted on 8/3/13
Well, well, well. Ibrahimovic my ass.
comment by Dubbed <ok> (U9163)
posted on 8/3/13
I knew it was too good to be true.
comment by Aaron Ramsey's biggest fan (U6685)
posted on 8/3/13
comment by 50 No longer trusting the process (U1147)
posted on 25/3/14
What a complete clueless idiot.
comment by Mr. Unsubscribe (U1110)
posted on 25/3/14
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
comment by John Locke (U1204)
posted on 25/3/14
right, how did you helmets find this?
comment by 50 No longer trusting the process (U1147)
posted on 25/3/14
We have our ways. Follow European Football very closely.
comment by Seebs™© 🇵🇸🇦🇫🇹🇷 (U1410)
posted on 30/4/14
RATE THIS ARTICLE
ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available