or to join or start a new Discussion

14 Comments
Article Rating 5 Stars

Tal Ben Haim on £36,000

Have anyone read this today?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18958234

How is this guy on 36,000 pounds a week?
He isn't even worth half that amount in wages.
And how on hell did he manage to play for Chelsea and City (City had their first cash injection from the Thai dude before the Arabs came in)?
Limited player with limited skill.
What I find funny amongst other things is that at Chelsea he expected to play before John Terry, Carvalho and Alex. Because he wasn't he blamed the coach (Avam Grant), who he played for later on at both Portsmouth and West Ham. He's always been a Championship level player at best.

I feel for the Portsmouth fans. They've tried to unload him but it seems like even his agent (Pini Zahavi - another ) doesn't know what's going on.

Sidenote - Anyone else find it amusing that Portsmouth's sponsors are 'Jobsite'?

posted on 24/7/12

The thing is, they could all leave on a free (or outstanding fees that Portsmouth need to make be covered by the buying team) and they could actually go somewhere, play and get paid. Right now, they will end up being out of pocket and with a club no longer in existence.

They are not the only ones to blame but are part of a group of people to be blamed.

posted on 24/7/12

The players are not the ones to blame at all. They just accepted the contracts they were given.

The owners and management are the people in charge of the club. They are the people who have ruined the club.

posted on 24/7/12

Players who stay, knowing full well the club can no longer pay them what was agreed by previous owners aren't to blame and by staying the club dies and they will end up with nothing themselves, aren't to blame at all?

I am not accusing the players of ruining the club. But if the club does die due to the players wages (as I stated previously there are other options for them), they will be partly to blame.

comment by Elvis (U7425)

posted on 24/7/12

It's all well and good pointing the finger at the players, but the club were throwing around big contracts left, right and centre. John Utaka was on 70k! Not a bad player, but a huge contract for a club like Pompey.

posted on 24/7/12

Whilst it's not the players fault that they were offered big contracts i do have a problem with players who claim to "love" the club but don't do anything to get themselves off the wage bill knowing full well that it could help the club survive and the money saved can go on the wages of support staff who have lost their jobs.

The main blame lies with the people in control at the club over the past decade or so, Peter Storrie and Sacha Gademark have come in for some particularly stiff criticism from Pompey supporters.

Also it's hard to tell fact from fiction in terms of player salaries, one paper (i think it was the daily mail) claimed John Utaka was on 80,000 a week another said it was closer to 70,000, the player himself released a statement denying that he was on that sort of money and said it was just under 30,000 a week, which for a med table Premier League club (which they were when he signed) was fair enough, and for people who may question if he's even worth that, he's just won the french title with Montpellier and has clocked up 43 internatioal appearances,so he can't be to bad.

comment by Elvis (U7425)

posted on 24/7/12

Yeh isn't a bad player and I believe that he scored the decisive goals that sealed the title? If 30k is the correct figure then that is certainly more acceptable.

posted on 24/7/12

This guy seriously needs to sort out that unibrow.

posted on 24/7/12

I used to chuckle at Brighton being sponsored by Skint (the record label) when they were close to going under.

comment by Mattyp (U8926)

posted on 25/7/12

All 8 of those players wont be out of work very long if the club goes under.

And in the case of players like Ben Haim, Halford and Norris they could probably get a nice little free transfer fee from whoever they sign for.

personally if I was Ben Haim I would sit it out based purely on the fact that the administrators and fans seem to be doing their best to try and paint him as a pantomime villain for getting paid what the club agreed to pay when they signed him.

posted on 30/7/12

Portsmouth will not go bust and disappear. We hear this all the time - clubs on the brink of extinction and all hope is lost. And then, at the very last minute, a buyer comes in and all is well again.
It's just media hype. Portsmouth will still be here in a hundred years' time.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 5 from 1 vote

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available