Proof that there is really no justice in football.
Suarez got 8 games for racist behaviour, with no evidence but Evra's word and his own admission. Terry got 4 games, with video evidence (which must be conclusive as his mouth is always pixellated whenever the clip is aired.)
True, it's a ban, and it helps us no end, but it's a clear example of one rule for one and one for another. Terry being banned is a clear admission by the FA that he is believed to be guilty, and if racism is racism, then why is he being treated less harshly than Suarez? Along with referees being protected to the hilt and the change of goalposts for the Financial Fair Play rules, how can the football authorities expect to be taken seriously?
Terry: Suspended
posted on 27/9/12
I didnt say he did hate black people. I'm just saying he used a word he knew was offensive to Evra on the grounds of race.
He admitted saying the word, but played dumb that he didnt know it was offensive in Europe (even though in mine, and obviously the judge's opinion, he did) & so was banned for it.
posted on 27/9/12
Judge?
posted on 27/9/12
It's viewed as more offensive in the Netherlands than it is in Britain. Spain is irrelevant; Suarez has never lived there.
posted on 27/9/12
There is a clear difference between the two.
Suarez used the language in an abusive manner. However (wrongly IMO) Terry was exonerated in the magistrates court that he meant to abuse Ferdinand and instead used the language without thinking. Mostly because of the testimony from Ashley Cole.
posted on 27/9/12
Well you said europe.
posted on 27/9/12
Suarez probably doesn't hate black people in the same way a man doesn't hate a dog. But he clearly used the word as a slur showing that he thinks that they're inferior to him in the same way that a man thinks a dog is inferior to him.
Nasty piece of work is Suarez.
posted on 27/9/12
Guys the word can be offensive!!!
I live in Spain and my friends husband (who is Spanish white) went mental on some guys because they called his wife (Black American) Negra when she entered the tube one time, they didn't know they were together so were chatting about her!
He translated 'negra' in that context as n****r.
So depending on what context you say it in, it could be seen as racist and derogatory.
posted on 27/9/12
RuiCostaJr
And he was found innocent in a court of law
posted on 27/9/12
A court of law that has to prove a burden of evidence that becomes difficult in these situations. If it was at the civil level then it'd be more appropriate in some ways.
posted on 27/9/12
The argument that the word that Suarez described Evra using isn't as bad because it is a standard word in Spanish is a stupid argument. Firstly, as others have said, he's lived in Europe for a few years now and should be aware of what he can and cannot say. Secondly, and more to the point, Terry is alleged to have called Ferdinand a 'black ' - which is also a word that does have an actual meaning rather than just being a useless obscenity. The words used by both players could refer to things in a way that is not offensive, but in the vast majority of situations people would find it offensive so I can't understand why a) people are complaining that Suarez' punishment should have been less than Terry's.
And re the whole 'innocent in court' thing, as a law student I can tell you that that's probably due to the standard of proof - courts require the magistrates to believe that Terry was racist 'beyond reasonable doubt' whereas for the FA I think they only require it to be more likely than not to have happened. So it might have been likely that Terry abused Ferdinand, but couldn't be shown beyond all doubt.