or to join or start a new Discussion

92 Comments
Article Rating 2 Stars

Tam Cowan & the "anti-Gers bias"

"The Ibrox fans seem to be offended by just about everything these days – zombie banners, TV clips, paying tax – but imagine anyone at the club having the brass neck to accuse BBC Scotland of anti-Gers bias?!"

"Have Rangers forgotten it was a BBC Scotland documentary that first alerted their fans to the dodgy dealings of a certain Craig Whyte?

BBC Alba provided live coverage of their run in the Ramsdens Cup, while Radio Scotland’s Sportsound programme has suddenly started doing full commentaries on Division Three matches.

And, as much as I’d love to think Sportscene elected to screen the League Cup clash at Ibrox in midweek as it featured the SPL table-toppers from Fir Park, I doubt that was the case.

Anti-Rangers bias? Gie’s peace."





Well said, Tam.

comment by Timmy (U14278)

posted on 30/9/12

daviecooper

despite it being required by the BBC Charter, do not offer the counter argument, and refuse point blank to publish the evidence they claim to have.

you do realise that mark daly was only allowed to look at the side contracts. He was not actually given them.

posted on 30/9/12

So he was not "allowed" (by whom???) to take pictures = show them on camera??

Might have been better spending his time doing that than staging the somewhat pathetic phone call & lying about never having met the struck off lawyer bloke (when he had interviewed him in the earlier "exclusive" on Rangers)....

And of course, the BBC would have checked the source of these prior to doing a whole programme around them...

comment by Timmy (U14278)

posted on 30/9/12

Wasn't allowed because the case is still ongoing. That is why.

posted on 30/9/12

it's a conspiraceeeeeeeeeeeeee
it's a conspiraceeeeeeeeeeeeee
They're aw oot tae get the berz, so they ur.

posted on 30/9/12

"Wasn't allowed because the case is still ongoing"???

If you are referring to the process of sub judice, then he would not have been allowed to say anything at all.

I ask yet again - if these documents exist, why has no one published them?

comment by Timmy (U14278)

posted on 30/9/12

RTC will after the case has been settled.

posted on 30/9/12

dry yer fackin eyes, you have been bangin on for years about celtic and there paranoia,

as soon as its you, every cant is oot tae get ye maybe the desire to be unliked has kicked ye right in the bawz

payback time, and you dont half squeal

posted on 30/9/12

Peter Lawell is behind the lot of this, it's a massive conspiraceeeeeeeee

posted on 30/9/12

Boringgggggggggggggggggggg

posted on 30/9/12

If RTC had the documents, he would have published months ago. Why wait? Finish all debate once and for all. Publish the evidence.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 2 from 5 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available