Serious question

Why? Spurs have tradition unlike Chelsea and City
--------------------------------

You think Chelsea have no tradition? An ever present top tier club. It's a pet hate of mine hearing bitter Arsenal and Spurs fans say that. Chelsea may not have been United or Liverpool before Abramovic's arrival but they were a top club I had a lot of time for.

They were a division 2 team in the 80s and a mid table team under Bates going nowhere fast. Stolen money made them who they are now.

Two teams I hate are Chelsea and City for the same reason. At least City seem to be investing in youth but I reckon that is just for show.

At least City seem to be investing in youth

--------------

This just sums up your lack of knowledge 90% of our signing overs the last 2-3 years have been youth

They were a division 2 team in the 80s and a mid table team under Bates going nowhere fast. Stolen money made them who they are now.
------------------------------------------

They are one of the all-time most consistently present league teams in the top tier. Every team has been down other divisions. Before Abramovic, Chelsea were far from midtable. They regularly finished among or close to the top 4. And they regularly beeatch slapped Spurs for over a decade in English football's most one-sided rivalry pre-Abramovic. The crap about them having no history or tradition is nonsense.

comment by Oscar. The Fantastic Four - Cech, JT, Lamps, Drogba, Legends,Leaders,Heroes !!Welcome home Jose!!!CFC 1L 1L 1C. (U12980)
posted 6 minutes ago
At least City seem to be investing in youth

--------------

This just sums up your lack of knowledge90% of our signing overs the last 2-3 years have been youth
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That simply shows your rampant idiocy. Why cut the sentence in half and ignore the rest? Pathetic little shlt shoveller.

you are so thick, The rest is irrelevant, what has city doing it for show got to do with Chelsea? You never mentioned anything about Chelsea buying youth

You really don't strike me as an Arsenal fan either, must just be an undercover potato, Arsenal fans are seriously not this stupid/jealous and they also wouldn't be licking the rim of Spurs' ass

comment by Oscar. The Fantastic Four - Cech, JT, Lamps, Drogba, Legends,Leaders,Heroes !!Welcome home Jose!!!CFC 1L 1L 1C. (U12980)
posted 7 minutes ago
you are so thick, The rest is irrelevant, what has city doing it for show got to do with Chelsea? You never mentioned anything about Chelsea buying youth
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it is irrelevant. Only to those without the ability to debate with integrity. Actually just like Chelsea. No integrity. Look at how your fans support and love a known racist from a family of racists.

comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 15 minutes ago
They were a division 2 team in the 80s and a mid table team under Bates going nowhere fast. Stolen money made them who they are now.
------------------------------------------

They are one of the all-time most consistently present league teams in the top tier. Every team has been down other divisions. Before Abramovic, Chelsea were far from midtable. They regularly finished among or close to the top 4. And they regularly beeatch slapped Spurs for over a decade in English football's most one-sided rivalry pre-Abramovic. The crap about them having no history or tradition is nonsense.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were always a mid table team. They were only famous for their NF fans in the 1980s. The turn started when Hoddle became their manager and brought in Gullit.

I have many spurs friends. And all bar none, dislike Chelsea and City. We may all dislike United but there is grudging respect for them. None for those two gate crashers.