Well done Jose: part 2!

comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
TalksRubbish

Agree.

While Chelsea are very efficient at stopping the opposition playing and denying them space, from a neutral perspective it would have been more of a spectacle if both teams tried to play football.

Find it somewhat ironic that JM was previously sacked by RA for his negative style of play.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was he? And you know this because?

comment by Greatteamswinit4times I'm dogmatic (U6008)
posted 38 minutes ago
When will these feckin bleeting scousers stop their crying?

--------------------

Chelsea fans are still talking about Garcia's goal in 2005.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho might be, fans are not. Your JA606 board is a laughing stock since losing yesterday.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

TheWhiteWall68

Because JM himself alluded to the reasons why RA sacked him when interviewed. The information is in the public domain.

comment by Greatteamswinit4times I'm dogmatic (U6008)
posted 13 minutes ago
Mourinho might be, fans are not.

-------------------

3 on my in laws are Chelsea season ticket holders and bring it up. There was an article on here that referenced it last week and many comments so you're lying aren't you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm lying? ok?..........how old are you?

comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 20 minutes ago
TheWhiteWall68

Because JM himself alluded to the reasons why RA sacked him when interviewed. The information is in the public domain.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he didnt. It was pure speculation

TheWhiteWall68

When he was Madrid manager, JM specifically spoke about RA’s decision to sack him. He was questioned by the Spanish media if he thought the same fate would await him at Madrid if he played a similarly negative style (the Madrid fans would not accept it).

When both Grant and then Scolari were appointed following JM’s dismissal, Gourlay stated it was a move away from the more negative approach utilised by JM as RA wanted a more expansive philosophy.

Bruce Buck has also spoken about it, so to pass it off as “pure speculation” is somewhat naïve.

comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 1 minute ago
TheWhiteWall68

When he was Madrid manager, JM specifically spoke about RA’s decision to sack him. He was questioned by the Spanish media if he thought the same fate would await him at Madrid if he played a similarly negative style (the Madrid fans would not accept it).

When both Grant and then Scolari were appointed following JM’s dismissal, Gourlay stated it was a move away from the more negative approach utilised by JM as RA wanted a more expansive philosophy.

Bruce Buck has also spoken about it, so to pass it off as “pure speculation” is somewhat naïve.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, it isn't.

TheWhiteWall68

I would suggest that to pass off factual records (some are available on You Tube if you care to observe) in which my point is evidenced and substantiated, as “speculation” is either naïve, or a refusal on your part to accept reality.