EBTs

comment by NNH - Mummys daddy (U10730)
posted 2 minutes ago
The only thing up my back alley is hot boabies and chocolate sauce
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I like my boabys cold and my chocolate hot

Didnt think this article would take as long as it did to descend into boabie talk Still this is JA606 after all

comment by Wieghorst67 (U12621)
posted 3 minutes ago
disclosure to the SPL wasnt handled correctly............

CHEATS


----------------------------------------------------------------------
same with your chaps

At least we did it with some good players though

comment by Wieghorst67 (U12621)
posted 1 minute ago
Didnt think this article would take as long as it did to descend into boabie talkStill this is JA606 after all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
blame NNH

comment by Wieghorst67 (U12621)
posted 43 seconds ago
Didnt think this article would take as long as it did to descend into boabie talkStill this is JA606 after all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I like my cawcks like I like my bodies

Stiff

oooh eer - its cool though cos zicos started another EBT thread

CT

From the report

"No provision of the Rules enabled the Board of the SPL retrospectively to terminate the registration of the player."

"What we are concerned with is the fact that the side-letters issued to the Specified Players, in the course of the operation of the EBT scheme, were not disclosed to the SPL and the SFA as required by their respective Rules"

"Oldco’s failure to disclose the side-letters to the SPL and the SFA was at least partly motivated by a wish not to risk prejudicing the tax advantages of the EBT scheme, we are unable to reach the conclusion that this led to any competitive advantage."

"We therefore proceed on the basis that the breach of the rules relating to disclosure did not give rise to any sporting advantage, direct or indirect. We do not therefore propose to consider those sanctions which are of a sporting nature."

All they were investigating was the disclosure of information and the eligibility of players if full disclosure was not made.

No player was found to be ineligible, no sporitn gadvantage was given.

If the tax case found Rangers guilty, another SPL hearing may have been held to determine if Rangers had gained an advantage by comitting tax fraud...thats the argument you are making, thats not what Nimmo ruled on

feck aff St3vie - were trying to talk boabies on this thread

Lord Nimmo - theres a tool of the highest order

comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 6 minutes ago
feck aff St3vie - were trying to talk boabies on this thread



----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you find tastes better cawck or baws?