or to join or start a new Discussion

43 Comments
Article Rating 1 Star

Manquillo

thought we had an option to buy him outright, but looks like that only kicks in in 2016.
atletico have the option to cancel the loan in the summer and take him back for a fee.
Have a feeling we wont be seeing him around next summer if atletico have their way!! Strange deal!
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/aug/06/liverpool-sign-javier-manquillo-loan-atletico-madrid

posted on 18/9/14

Never understood the 'loan with option to buy' myself. Can someone explain the benefits for the club loaning him out?

posted on 18/9/14

Nah we've loaned them Hernandez. They're doing our bidding and keeping him happy until we are back in the CL.

posted on 18/9/14

king, it'll likely be different for every club.

For example, the benefits for us loaning Nani to Sporting and Monaco loaning us Falcao are very different.

Plus some times there's not always a benefit to the parent club when loaning out players but they can have their hand forced, for whatever reason.

posted on 18/9/14

Aquilani loans

posted on 18/9/14

the benefi to us is likely having a "back up" right back and not having to pay his wages for 2 years, whilst he develops.
i assume the fixed fee of £5m after 2 years means that if atletico were happy to not take him back after the first year, they wont be too upset selling him for £5m after the second.
why else would it be a 2 year loan? if theres a fixed fee then surely it would be a 1 year loan and fee at the end of year 1 if we want him!?

posted on 18/9/14

Makes sense, Lucas.

posted on 19/9/14

The echo says we have the option for 5mil this coming summer

posted on 19/9/14

So I guess we will find out this summer

posted on 19/9/14

comment by John Henrys Explosive Offense - #STOPISIS (U18764)
posted 16 hours, 18 minutes ago
Why would we do a deal that favours atletico?

Thats right, we wouldnt im sure ive read we have the option of 5mil this summer and more the summer after
Reply | Add Comment | Complain | Share

Talk about idiocy. He was their player and under contract to them. And so you would have to do a deal each suits them. Or do you guys think Liverpool is above basic economics.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 1 from 1 vote

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available