LFC and FFP

comment by StringerBell (U11749)
posted 42 minutes ago
wow, you must be the 'McGuyver' of Ja606!
you could start an Argument out of an avocado and baby oil!!
How did you read it as a negative.
i said it would be a 'disgrace'.. hello...mcfly?!..(knock on head)
--------------------
Sanction can mean different things.

The comment you should have made was

It would be a disgrace to implement sanctions against Liverpool.

From my limited understanding of FPP, aren't stadium and development costs excluded. We had losses of approximately £40m in 2011-12 which were costs attributed to the failed Stanley Park scheme, so of the £90m or so losses in the last two financial years, £40m odd would be excluded I think. If so, that brings our losses down to £50m, and then with the wage exclusion from 2011-12, I think that would bring us in line with FPP.

3 Options, huh trying to give them a way out, thats nice....ok, lets give Kolo a chance to 'Phone a Friend' or 50/50...
lets just hope that 'Friend' isn't 'John Henry's Explosive offence'...
wot a prat!
and really, i don't want this thread to be skewed by a misread and some dumb keyboard warrior.
you got a good Article going...I apologise on their behalf.

I eat semantics for breakfast and morning meals.

"The comment you should have made was

It would be a disgrace to implement sanctions against Liverpool. "

I'm sitting here making that strange raspberry sound when someone's suppressing a laugh.

you got a good Article going...I apologise on their behalf.
========================================================
OK, let's get back on topic, then.

1) What evidence do you have that "the fools running it" are corrupt?
2) Why is your club supporting some rules introduced by fools?

They can also buy players at one of the two farm clubs and loan them to city at no cost, with the other club paying their wages...
-------------------------------

Someone clearly doesn't know the rules regarding loan players or the buying of players by MLS or Aussie teams.

Quite embarrassing really,

comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 20 minutes ago
"The comment you should have made was

It would be a disgrace to implement sanctions against Liverpool. "

I'm sitting here making that strange raspberry sound when someone's suppressing a laugh.
----------------
I know the noise, it's the one that everyone makes when you lot talk about arsenal winning the league.

To be fair stringer I did ask what you where on about and took it wrong.

Who's the keyboard warrior??

It will all come down to whether you can qualify for the pre 2011 contracts to be exempt, there is certain criteria in terms of your losses for that to be the case (criteria City thought they had met, which is why they weren't happy with the fine). From what I've seen in your accounts, you would qualify easily though.

Just on some earlier points quickly, net spend is irrelevant, FFP only looks at the profit and loss, not the balance sheet, and in that world it is amortisation that is important.