I didn't watch the game last night, but read about it on Sky sports instead, and came across this very interesting quotation by Brenda.
Liverpool could also have a penalty, with Diego Costa appearing to handle while on the ground, and Courtois seemed to handle outside the area.
"I was so disappointed we never got at least one penalty. It is a clear handball by Costa so how we didn't get that..." Rodgers added.
"Their goalkeeper, who had to be outstanding, has also handballed it outside the area."
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11938/9654407/capital-one-cup-brendan-rodgers-insists-liverpool-can-make-it-to-wembley-by-beating-chelsea
I didn't see either incident, but from the comments made by Brenda, he thinks that he should have had two penalties(at least one apparently) for last nights incidents.
I can't possibly comment on whether the officials made the right decisions or not because I haven't seen them. However, I want to focus especially on the last part of his comments about Courtois handling the ball OUTSIDE the area.
Now if this was the case, then how on earth can it be a penalty?
LAL
posted on 21/1/15
You can't read, let alone debate, don't even try
posted on 21/1/15
comment by Neo Liverpool (U9135)
posted 4 minutes ago
"I was so disappointed we never got at least one penalty. It is a clear handball by Costa so how we didn't get that..." Rodgers added.
"Their goalkeeper, who had to be outstanding, has also handballed it outside the area."
The fact he said "also" clearly shows he is considering that as a seperate incident to the penalty decisions. Are you mentally disabled, or just thick?
----------------------------------------
Neo
He is aspecial one this one. Commenting on a game he didn't watch and then writing an article without reading the article properly.
he is probably sat in his white van right now complaining about the sun banning page 3. He is a red top rag title reader.
Poor chap
posted on 21/1/15
It's a simple question, one that requires either a yes or a no answer. Hardly a 'debate'
posted on 21/1/15
Comment Deleted by Article Creator
posted on 21/1/15
The fact he said "also" clearly shows he is considering that as a seperate incident to the penalty decisions. Are you mentally disabled, or just thick?
------
Fantastic original and hilarious. 5 insulting.
posted on 21/1/15
Farticle.
posted on 21/1/15
he is probably sat in his white van right now complaining about the sun banning page 3. He is a red top rag title reader.
...........................................................
Surely the priority should be banning page 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 etc. I mean at least if they have a huge half naked picture of a woman it gives them less room to push their casual racism and general all round backwards agenda...
The whole thing should just be turned into topless women, would be far less dangerous IMO.
posted on 21/1/15
Everyone can enjoy a good
█.................█..........█
█...............█..█........█
█augh.......█ █ █ █t.....█iverpool
█............█........█.....█
█ █ █ █...█...........█...█ █ █ █
and may I please introduce:
█...............█........█ █ █ █
█.............█..█......█.......█
█augh.......█ █ █t....█ █ █ █renda
█............█.....█....█.......█
█ █ █ █...█.......█...█ █ █ █
posted on 21/1/15
This is brilliant...two separate comments and you have tried to lump them together to make someone look stupid...
reading isn't your strong point is it?
posted on 21/1/15
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator