On 606 last season i made an article claiming that the drugs issue in football was ridiculous and under reported. Since it came to light that the clubs involved with miscrient players cover the misdemeanor by stating players are injured, how many of you are betting that our club "would" be one of those clubs to hide the action? We have players with long injuries u think this is a possibility.
p.s im throwing a question, not an accusation.
Serious question
posted on 13/9/11
A fair question Mike, but I would find it hard to believe that our players are so high up the league & the pressure is so intense that they need chemical support to keep them on the level. I might be wrong, but I would worry if ordinary players in an ordinary team can't cope with the pressures. Strikes me as possibly a problem in society. But maybe we're supporting a team that doesn't have that sort of a problem.
posted on 13/9/11
I can honestly say that even though Davide and I were "potentially" doing sm ack the night before he got the call for the test, he is definitely injured, as he fell over after the phone call!
LOL...in case a lawyer reads this, it is a
posted on 13/9/11
..joke and in now way connected to me and paddy's night out on the meth
posted on 13/9/11
over a year ago...(keep pressing send accidentally ...bloomin computer)
posted on 13/9/11
rehab.com
posted on 13/9/11
If our players are on anything, it's the defence on 'Mogadon!'
posted on 13/9/11
Davide was repoted to have taken some net bulging chemicals, they were called goals thus Grayson putting him on the bench all the time and then expecting him to challenge for headers in the 93rd minute wen were a man down and losing 3-1 etc
posted on 13/9/11
We need a somma
He's injured you know?