“Celtic owned shares in Rangers at time of 1994 takeover reveals David Low"
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/celtic-owned-shares-rangers-time-12096692#ICID=ios_DailyRecordNewsApp_AppShare_Click_MailShare
Well, well, well. That’ll be a popular revelation It was also against the rules 👍
And so to the rulebook. Well, the Scottish Football Association rules state that:
“Except with the prior written consent of the Board, no Member, Associate Member or Official, may at one time either directly or indirectly:-
21.1.1 hold or seek to acquire beneficial ownership of or deal in the shares or securities of another club; or
21.1.2 be a member or shareholder of, or lender in any capacity to, more than one club…"
Celtic illegally owned shares in Rangers
posted on 28/2/18
comment by Curly 💩 - I'm mumpsimus and I know it.' (except on a Wednesday, that is my obstreperous day ) - ITS JIST A BIG CLIQUE N'AT (U1103)
posted 3 minutes ago
And for final clarity, I said is IS allowed not WAS allowed - which is what you seem to be clinging to.
+++¥
And it is NOT allowed
Unless you fulfill the exemption criteria
It really is quite simple 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah, so it is allowed then.
posted on 28/2/18
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/2/18
Yes, it is. You state it yourself.
posted on 28/2/18
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/2/18
Strangely, you’ve not picked Esc up on his assertion that it was against the rules, without his knowing if these were the rules at the time, and if it makes a difference when they were purchased.
Yet, you’ve picked up on what was a valid statement from BH-that it is allowed, even if it is only in certain circumstances.
And it doesn’t say ‘may’ in the paragraph.
Night Curly.
posted on 28/2/18
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/2/18
After reading through some of the comments, I have to agree curly's last comment. It is poor English.
posted on 28/2/18
For the OP, celtic should get hammered for that!
posted on 28/2/18
comment by My POV-I get my name back! (U10636)
posted 13 hours, 50 minutes ago
comment by RonaldVilliers (U21490)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by 🇬🇧 elite.... the wolf wan (U16936)
posted 26 seconds ago
This whole name changing thing does my tats in... can you not just bum the loser or something... I like to know who’s comments I blindly follow and who’s I blindly slate as being pash
---------------------------------------------------------------
spot on.
The Tims always lose the bets as well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m 2 for 2 against lauders from last season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did it happen twice? Jeezo. Same again for the 11th?
posted on 28/2/18
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator