Liverpool wage bill bigger than City CFC

comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 2 hours, 29 minutes ago
The liverpool echo have disputed that liverpool's wage bill is about City's because the City wage bill only covers half as many staff as Liverpool's with the rest being paid through other subsidiaries.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/truth-liverpools-wage-bill-man-15830856.amp
----------------------------------------------------------------------

They’re wrong, all of the CFG staff that work for us have to be charged back to us, it was in the UEFA statement five years ago.

How on earth have you got that many staff though? That’s crazy, we’re not even on that including the CFG and that covers six clubs.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yep, seems about right - Klopp the organic manager that grows his players in his allotment and hates spending money has actually spent about 400 million nicker on players and has the second highest wage bill in England.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Moronic thinking..

Value of the squad v cost of building it?

Mane and Salah easily 140m each.. that covers the entire team cost.

Don't worry about obsessing about the league's top team, worry about your own team.

comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 14 hours, 42 minutes ago
It's all the goal bonuses..

Chelsea wouldn't know about those.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Think we are second leading goal scorers in all competitons behind City

comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 days, 13 hours ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 2 hours, 29 minutes ago
The liverpool echo have disputed that liverpool's wage bill is about City's because the City wage bill only covers half as many staff as Liverpool's with the rest being paid through other subsidiaries.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/truth-liverpools-wage-bill-man-15830856.amp
----------------------------------------------------------------------

They’re wrong, all of the CFG staff that work for us have to be charged back to us, it was in the UEFA statement five years ago.

How on earth have you got that many staff though? That’s crazy, we’re not even on that including the CFG and that covers six clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If that is the case then the cost will be charged back to you, but it still wont come under the wage bill. It will be another expense. So the Echo article would be right

comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 56 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 days, 13 hours ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 2 hours, 29 minutes ago
The liverpool echo have disputed that liverpool's wage bill is about City's because the City wage bill only covers half as many staff as Liverpool's with the rest being paid through other subsidiaries.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/truth-liverpools-wage-bill-man-15830856.amp
----------------------------------------------------------------------

They’re wrong, all of the CFG staff that work for us have to be charged back to us, it was in the UEFA statement five years ago.

How on earth have you got that many staff though? That’s crazy, we’re not even on that including the CFG and that covers six clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If that is the case then the cost will be charged back to you, but it still wont come under the wage bill. It will be another expense. So the Echo article would be right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Correct.

comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 4 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 days, 13 hours ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 2 hours, 29 minutes ago
The liverpool echo have disputed that liverpool's wage bill is about City's because the City wage bill only covers half as many staff as Liverpool's with the rest being paid through other subsidiaries.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/truth-liverpools-wage-bill-man-15830856.amp
----------------------------------------------------------------------

They’re wrong, all of the CFG staff that work for us have to be charged back to us, it was in the UEFA statement five years ago.

How on earth have you got that many staff though? That’s crazy, we’re not even on that including the CFG and that covers six clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If that is the case then the cost will be charged back to you, but it still wont come under the wage bill. It will be another expense. So the Echo article would be right
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It was split between the two depending on who or what it was (them saying about the executives for instance I don’t think is right at all).

There’s an assumption there too that your numbers of staff are the norm as well, which isn’t necessarily the case (Spurs for example gave less than we report). I’d
be interested to know what they think is outsourced from us that isn’t from others as well and included in that as the other expenses isn’t that big a differentiator between ourselves and others.

comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 4 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 days, 13 hours ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 2 hours, 29 minutes ago
The liverpool echo have disputed that liverpool's wage bill is about City's because the City wage bill only covers half as many staff as Liverpool's with the rest being paid through other subsidiaries.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/truth-liverpools-wage-bill-man-15830856.amp
----------------------------------------------------------------------

They’re wrong, all of the CFG staff that work for us have to be charged back to us, it was in the UEFA statement five years ago.

How on earth have you got that many staff though? That’s crazy, we’re not even on that including the CFG and that covers six clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If that is the case then the cost will be charged back to you, but it still wont come under the wage bill. It will be another expense. So the Echo article would be right
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It was split between the two depending on who or what it was (them saying about the executives for instance I don’t think is right at all).

There’s an assumption there too that your numbers of staff are the norm as well, which isn’t necessarily the case (Spurs for example gave less than we report). I’d
be interested to know what they think is outsourced from us that isn’t from others as well and included in that as the other expenses isn’t that big a differentiator between ourselves and others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mate your club outsourced part of Mancinis salary to a 3rd company in the middle east.

Ah ok. Sorry, I’m only talking about the published accounts. If you’re talking about that then fair enough if it’s true, which I’m reserving judgment on.

comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 4 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 days, 13 hours ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 2 hours, 29 minutes ago
The liverpool echo have disputed that liverpool's wage bill is about City's because the City wage bill only covers half as many staff as Liverpool's with the rest being paid through other subsidiaries.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/truth-liverpools-wage-bill-man-15830856.amp
----------------------------------------------------------------------

They’re wrong, all of the CFG staff that work for us have to be charged back to us, it was in the UEFA statement five years ago.

How on earth have you got that many staff though? That’s crazy, we’re not even on that including the CFG and that covers six clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If that is the case then the cost will be charged back to you, but it still wont come under the wage bill. It will be another expense. So the Echo article would be right
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It was split between the two depending on who or what it was (them saying about the executives for instance I don’t think is right at all).

There’s an assumption there too that your numbers of staff are the norm as well, which isn’t necessarily the case (Spurs for example gave less than we report). I’d
be interested to know what they think is outsourced from us that isn’t from others as well and included in that as the other expenses isn’t that big a differentiator between ourselves and others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mate your club outsourced part of Mancinis salary to a 3rd company in the middle east.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Can't believe Liverpool pay so much in wages