Fkn he'll. ..Utd are utter dogs!

Of course, they could turn up and show something when they play Liverpool. Wouldn't surprise me if they did, they owe it to their suffering fans
_________________________________________
You are only saying this because you think somehow spurs are going to catch up in the league.
15 defeats in the last 45 games says otherwise..
And also the facts, several of your players will be gone soon!

the facts are

a) Utd have a long long history of buying rubbish. this has lead them to where they are now.

b) arsenal have a long history of mollycoddling players and emry seems to have no clue about defends. this is why they are where they are.

c) spurs are clinging on. new stadium blah blah but tjey are giving everyone new deals even though they look shot. this would worry me if I were a spurs fan.

d) for Liverpool read spurs just not as bad as we have bought really well up to this summer and are now backing that squad.

e) city have anyone they want any time they want.

f) Chelsea have done it to themselves.


if I were a betting man I would be thinking Chelsea are more likely to come good than any of the others and will be there longer than Liverpool.

we should win this title as if we don't I can only see the city.money flowing and it being even harder next year.

95 point minimum probably 98. tough. almost unheard of

comment by moreinjuredthanowen (U9641)
posted 2 hours, 9 minutes ago
the facts are

a) Utd have a long long history of buying rubbish. this has lead them to where they are now.

b) arsenal have a long history of mollycoddling players and emry seems to have no clue about defends. this is why they are where they are.

c) spurs are clinging on. new stadium blah blah but tjey are giving everyone new deals even though they look shot. this would worry me if I were a spurs fan.

d) for Liverpool read spurs just not as bad as we have bought really well up to this summer and are now backing that squad.

e) city have anyone they want any time they want.

f) Chelsea have done it to themselves.


if I were a betting man I would be thinking Chelsea are more likely to come good than any of the others and will be there longer than Liverpool.

we should win this title as if we don't I can only see the city.money flowing and it being even harder next year.

95 point minimum probably 98. tough. almost unheard of
----------------------------------------------------------------------

How should Liverpool win the title , when they haven't won the title for 30 years? Titles are not won in October.

comment by Liverpoolwhoelse17 (U16825)
posted 4 hours, 54 minutes ago
that was one of manures best performance's of the season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a terrible misuse of the apostrophe.

up yours

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 hour, 56 minutes ago
comment by moreinjuredthanowen (U9641)
posted 2 hours, 9 minutes ago
the facts are

a) Utd have a long long history of buying rubbish. this has lead them to where they are now.

b) arsenal have a long history of mollycoddling players and emry seems to have no clue about defends. this is why they are where they are.

c) spurs are clinging on. new stadium blah blah but tjey are giving everyone new deals even though they look shot. this would worry me if I were a spurs fan.

d) for Liverpool read spurs just not as bad as we have bought really well up to this summer and are now backing that squad.

e) city have anyone they want any time they want.

f) Chelsea have done it to themselves.


if I were a betting man I would be thinking Chelsea are more likely to come good than any of the others and will be there longer than Liverpool.

we should win this title as if we don't I can only see the city.money flowing and it being even harder next year.

95 point minimum probably 98. tough. almost unheard of
----------------------------------------------------------------------

How should Liverpool win the title , when they haven't won the title for 30 years? Titles are not won in October.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

"should" doesn't equal "will"

"should":

1. used to indicate obligation, duty, or correctness, typically when criticising someone's actions.
"Liverpool should have been champions last year, the fools."
or
2.used to indicate what is probable.
"£85m should be enough to buy any centre half never mind a donkey like maguire"

So yeah Liverpool have a great shot this year. we "should" win it cos next year "should" just be harder..... add in 95-98 points needed being "almost unheard of" aka almost impossible.


I wouldn't mind but i was ok about spurs, didn't even give you a dig like your over the hill broken down team deserve

Why are you being so nice to sandy clown?

comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 39 minutes ago
Why are you being so nice to sandy clown?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

dunno really, maybe i'm just a nice guy?

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 6 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by moreinjuredthanowen (U9641)
posted 2 hours, 9 minutes ago
the facts are

a) Utd have a long long history of buying rubbish. this has lead them to where they are now.

b) arsenal have a long history of mollycoddling players and emry seems to have no clue about defends. this is why they are where they are.

c) spurs are clinging on. new stadium blah blah but tjey are giving everyone new deals even though they look shot. this would worry me if I were a spurs fan.

d) for Liverpool read spurs just not as bad as we have bought really well up to this summer and are now backing that squad.

e) city have anyone they want any time they want.

f) Chelsea have done it to themselves.


if I were a betting man I would be thinking Chelsea are more likely to come good than any of the others and will be there longer than Liverpool.

we should win this title as if we don't I can only see the city.money flowing and it being even harder next year.

95 point minimum probably 98. tough. almost unheard of
----------------------------------------------------------------------

How should Liverpool win the title , when they haven't won the title for 30 years? Titles are not won in October.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Winning trophies is in Liverpool's blood. Hadn't won the CL for 14 years but it's in our nature to succeed in Europe so home came number 6.

Somehow, only United have more titles than Liverpool despite our drought. I'd wager that we'll surpass 20 titles before United win one again. At least you get Beavertown at the new Spurs ground, eh?

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 9 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by moreinjuredthanowen (U9641)
posted 2 hours, 9 minutes ago
the facts are

a) Utd have a long long history of buying rubbish. this has lead them to where they are now.

b) arsenal have a long history of mollycoddling players and emry seems to have no clue about defends. this is why they are where they are.

c) spurs are clinging on. new stadium blah blah but tjey are giving everyone new deals even though they look shot. this would worry me if I were a spurs fan.

d) for Liverpool read spurs just not as bad as we have bought really well up to this summer and are now backing that squad.

e) city have anyone they want any time they want.

f) Chelsea have done it to themselves.


if I were a betting man I would be thinking Chelsea are more likely to come good than any of the others and will be there longer than Liverpool.

we should win this title as if we don't I can only see the city.money flowing and it being even harder next year.

95 point minimum probably 98. tough. almost unheard of
----------------------------------------------------------------------

How should Liverpool win the title , when they haven't won the title for 30 years? Titles are not won in October.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Worry about your own team ya muppet