or to join or start a new Discussion

87 Comments
Article Rating 5 Stars

How should we play from now on?

This is a sandy free zone

So these are fixtures up to united away on 4/12

Everton - away
Red star - away
Sheff Utd - home
West Ham - away
Olympiacos - home
Bournemouth - away

We currently have a fully fit squad bar Lloris and Lamela ( who should be fit as he only just missed the Liverpool game )

So what’s the starting 11 you want to see?
What points count we’ll get?

Please I’m not interested in views of poch being sacked or not that’s been done on every other article

Cheers - COYS

comment by Hengy (U9129)

posted on 29/10/19

I still don’t see Sessegnon as a LB currently but he’ll struggle to game time as a attacking player with the players ahead of him.

Difficult situation for him but we have to find space for him.

All the more reason going out in the league cup is disappointing.

Most could’ve been playing Crawley tonight.

posted on 29/10/19

comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 6 hours, 14 minutes ago
This isn’t what I00% think we should do, but I’m gonna put something a bit left field out there, rather than recycle the same options.

For a start, Sessegnon. I can’t see that he was bought to be an out & out attacker when we have so many other options. Full backs don’t need to be outstanding defenders these days; they need to have good technique and be able to bomb up & down, like Walker/Rose, TAA/Robbo. Sess absolutely has the youth and attributes to play this role. We should be moulding him into it urgently. Rose is done, Davies is a squad player.

Foyth. I disagree with those writing him off. His problem is he’s a CB who probably isn’t good enough to command a star there. Can play RB but not in the rampaging way we’d want. Is decent on the ball though. In many ways he reminds me of Dier circa 2015, at which point Poch converted him to a DM and it worked well.

For me we peaked around the time we had a DM (Dier) that could drop into defence when our athletic full backs (Walker, Rose) went forward. We defended from the front by playing this way, had a clear and obvious style and shape in both attack and defence.

Sissoko and Winks aren’t cutting it. I dislike 433. Rose, Eriksen and Aurier should be finished as first 11 players. On the basis of all that;

__________Gazza
KWP___Toby__Verts__Sessegnon
_______Foyth__Ndombele
Son_______GLC______Moura
__________Kane

And when we attack

_________Gazza
___Toby__Foyth___Verts
KWP____Ndombele__Sessegnon
____Son__GLC___Moura
_________Kane

Basically trying to use existing players to replicate a system that has worked for us in the past.

Not my actual choice as such, just chucking ideas out there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This basically replicates the Bielsa 3313, which is basically the maddest, most entertaining system ever. On that basis alone I support this message

posted on 29/10/19

This is a sandy free zone
=============



Just saw this and it's brilliant!

The whole of the Tottenham ground should be marked Sandy Free Zone

Talking about how we should play, we already have found the style.

Against Red Star that is the correct way for us to play with the players we have.

Couple of things though: Bring back Davies instead of Rose, play Ndombele in Eriksen's position, play WInks and Sissoko behind him, and play Foyth or KWP instead of Aurier.

Keep Toby and Sanchez at the back. Gazzanigga in goal. Up front, Son and Kane.
Swap Dele, with Lamela.

We have actually played very well on Sunday, and you just had to remember their fans whistling loudly to get the ref to end the game to realise they didn't have it easy. Gomez and Milner were brought on to hang on. In light of the tonking we were promised, I feel shortchanged by Klopp's side.

posted on 29/10/19

comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 3 hours, 20 minutes ago
Sandy's article is tragic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The guy is a poltroon!

posted on 29/10/19

sandys a sad case. writes articles but has so many filtered hes only talking to the people he hasn't got around to filtering yet. once they say something he doesn't agree with, filtered.

comment by (U18814)

posted on 29/10/19

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 30/10/19

comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 11 hours, 29 minutes ago
sandys a sad case. writes articles but has so many filtered hes only talking to the people he hasn't got around to filtering yet. once they say something he doesn't agree with, filtered.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Read everything he says in Donald Trump's voice. Suddenly it all makes more sense

posted on 30/10/19

comment by Amanda Hugginkiss (U11574)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 11 hours, 29 minutes ago
sandys a sad case. writes articles but has so many filtered hes only talking to the people he hasn't got around to filtering yet. once they say something he doesn't agree with, filtered.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Read everything he says in Donald Trump's voice. Suddenly it all makes more sense
----------------------------------------------------------------------


This is amazing

posted on 30/10/19

I can't comment on any of his articles, so he must have filtered me too

I haven't even posted on any of his threads for weeks! He must've seen my Trump post above and got the hump

posted on 30/10/19

comment by Amanda Hugginkiss (U11574)
posted 6 hours, 42 minutes ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 11 hours, 29 minutes ago
sandys a sad case. writes articles but has so many filtered hes only talking to the people he hasn't got around to filtering yet. once they say something he doesn't agree with, filtered.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Read everything he says in Donald Trump's voice. Suddenly it all makes more sense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
thats so good.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 5 from 3 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available